Corruption Scandal Rocks Indonesia: Glory Harimas and Yayasan Food Security Under Scrutiny
Text
The chairman of the Indonesia Food Security Review Foundation, Glory Harimas Sihombing, has been designated as a suspect in the ongoing investigation into the alleged corruption surrounding the School Meal Program (Program Makan Bergizi Gratis, or SPPG), according to CNN Indonesia. The development marks a significant escalation in the case, which has drawn scrutiny from multiple government agencies and media outlets.
The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office (Kejaksaan Agung) confirmed on June 18, 2026, that Harimas is under investigation for alleged involvement in irregularities related to the procurement of goods and services for the SPPG, a government initiative aimed at providing free meals to schoolchildren. A source within the prosecutor’s office stated that Harimas is accused of “repeatedly funneling funds from the sale of SPPG points to Dadan Hindayana,” a former official linked to the program. This claim aligns with reports from detikNews, which cited allegations that Hindayana, a former director of the SPPG, received both foreign and local currency bribes from suspects in the case.
Dadan Hindayana, who previously served as head of the SPPG’s implementation team, is also under investigation. According to detikNews, prosecutors allege that he accepted “cash bribes in both foreign and rupiah currencies” from individuals implicated in the corruption scandal. The exact nature of his role and the extent of his alleged misconduct remain under review, with the Kejaksaan Agung noting that his case is “interconnected with multiple other suspects.”
The SPPG, formally known as the School Meal Program, has been a focal point of public and political debate since its inception. The program, managed by the National Agency for Government Procurement (BGN), aims to ensure nutritional support for millions of students nationwide. However, recent revelations of mismanagement have raised concerns about the transparency of its operations. On June 17, 2026, BGN issued a statement emphasizing its commitment to “strict adherence to legal procedures” and announcing that it would “no longer procure electric motorcycles or related items in the future,” a move perceived as a response to ongoing scrutiny.
Prosecutors have also questioned Harimas regarding his alleged role in the case, as reported by Tempo.co. The Jakarta Prosecutor’s Office, which leads the investigation, has not yet disclosed the specific charges against him but stated that his case is “part of a broader inquiry into the mismanagement of SPPG funds.” Harimas, who also serves as a director within the SPPG’s oversight structure, has not publicly commented on the allegations.
The case has intensified following the arrest of several high-profile figures, including Lodewyk Pusung, a former BGN official, and Asep Yusuf Somantri, a former head of the SPPG’s logistics division. Both are currently detained at Rutan Salemba, a detention center in Jakarta. The Kejaksaan Agung has not provided a timeline for the trial but has indicated that additional suspects may be charged as the investigation progresses.
Legal experts have highlighted the complexity of the case, noting that it involves multiple layers of government procurement and oversight. “This investigation touches on systemic issues within public procurement, including the allocation of funds and the accountability of officials,” said a legal analyst quoted in Kompas.com. The case also raises questions about the role of private entities in government programs, as several companies implicated in the scandal have been linked to the SPPG’s supply chain.
As the probe continues, the Kejaksaan Agung has urged all parties involved to cooperate fully with investigators. A spokesperson for the office stated, “We are committed to ensuring that justice is served and that those responsible for any wrongdoing are held accountable.” Meanwhile, the BGN has reiterated its pledge to “strengthen internal controls” and prevent future irregularities.
The SPPG scandal has drawn widespread public attention, with citizens and advocacy groups demanding greater transparency in government spending. The case has also sparked discussions about the need for reform in Indonesia’s public procurement system, which has historically faced challenges related to corruption and inefficiency.
For now, the focus remains on the legal proceedings against Harimas, Hindayana, and other suspects. The outcome of the case could set a precedent for how similar corruption allegations are handled in the future, particularly within large-scale government programs.
Text
Subheading
Legal Proceedings and Institutional Responses
The Kejaksaan Agung has confirmed that Glory Harimas Sihombing is under investigation for alleged violations of Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Law. The prosecutor’s office stated that the case involves “the misuse of public funds and the unauthorized transfer of resources related to the SPPG.” Harimas, who also serves as the head of the Indonesia Food Security Review Foundation, has been accused of facilitating financial transactions that bypassed standard procurement protocols.
Dadan Hindayana, meanwhile, is facing allegations of accepting bribes from multiple sources. According to detikNews, prosecutors have identified at least two