David Cross Disgusted by Riyadh Comedy Festival Comics

Here’s a breakdown of teh ⁣article, summarizing the controversy surrounding the Riyadh comedy festival ⁢in Saudi Arabia:

The Core Controversy:

Several comedians are facing backlash for performing at a comedy festival in Saudi Arabia, a country widely ⁤considered to have a⁤ highly oppressive regime with a poor human rights record. Critics argue that accepting payment from the Saudi government is akin to taking “blood money” and represents a notable hypocrisy.

Key Points & Reactions:

* Contract Restrictions: The festival contract explicitly prohibits comedians⁣ from making jokes or material that could be seen as critical of Saudi Arabia, its leadership, its culture, its royal family, its legal ⁤system, or religion. This raises concerns about censorship and artistic freedom.
* Bill⁤ burr’s Defense: Bill Burr, who performed at the festival, defended his ⁢participation, stating it was a positive⁢ experience and could lead to positive change. He noted the audience and royals enjoyed the show and described the locals as “just like us.”
* Atsuko okatsuka’s Exposure: Comedian Atsuko Okatsuka publicly shared the restrictive contract, highlighting the limitations placed on performers.
* Marc Maron’s Scathing Criticism: Marc Maron delivered a highly critical take, drawing a direct link ‍between the Saudi government and the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and sarcastically framing the festival as entertainment provided by those ⁢responsible for serious atrocities.
* ⁣ Shane Gillis’s Refusal: Shane Gillis turned down a substantial offer to perform, stating he “took a principled stand” and wouldn’t “9/11 your friends” (referencing the Saudi government’s alleged involvement in the 9/11 attacks).
* 9/11 Lawsuit: The article mentions a recent lawsuit attempting to prove Saudi involvement in⁣ the 9/11 attacks, adding another layer to the controversy.

In essence,‍ the article ⁤details a debate within the ‍comedy community about the ⁤ethics of performing in a country with a problematic human rights record, especially when significant financial incentives are involved and artistic expression is heavily ⁤restricted.