Death of Lisa: Prosecution’s Verdict
- LYON, France (April 11, 2025) — Prosecutors in Lyon have appealed the 25-year prison sentence handed down to Myriam Jaouen, a former nursery employee convicted in 2022 of...
- Jaouen, 30, was found guilty on April 3 by the Rhône Assize Court of "torture or acts of barbarism resulting in death without intent." However, the jury rejected...
- Jean Sannier,the lawyer representing the innocence association in danger,a civil party in the trial,told AFP that the prosecution's appeal was not surprising.
Prosecution Appeals 25-Year Sentance in Baby Poisoning Case
Table of Contents
- Prosecution Appeals 25-Year Sentance in Baby Poisoning Case
- Prosecution Appeals 25-Year Sentence in Baby Poisoning Case: Yoru Questions answered
- What is the Myriam Jaouen Case About?
- Why Did Prosecutors Appeal the Sentence?
- what Were the Original Charges and Verdict?
- What Did the defense Argue?
- How Did the Parents React to the verdict and Appeal?
- What Were the details of the Crime?
- What Were the Key Unanswered Questions in the Case?
- What Role did “La Petite Lisa” Play?
- Overview of the Case
LYON, France (April 11, 2025) — Prosecutors in Lyon have appealed the 25-year prison sentence handed down to Myriam Jaouen, a former nursery employee convicted in 2022 of poisoning a baby in her care. The prosecution had sought a 30-year sentence, with 20 years without parole.
Jaouen, 30, was found guilty on April 3 by the Rhône Assize Court of “torture or acts of barbarism resulting in death without intent.” However, the jury rejected the murder charge requested by the Advocate General, which would have implied intent to kill.
Reactions to the Appeal
Jean Sannier,the lawyer representing the innocence association in danger,a civil party in the trial,told AFP that the prosecution’s appeal was not surprising. He noted that the prosecution maintained throughout the investigation and trial that Jaouen intended to kill the child.Sannier added, “The family expressed that the verdict was a second death for their child; the public prosecutor’s office respected this complementary suffering inflicted by the court.”
Parents’ Disappointment with Initial Verdict
Catherine Bourgade, the parents’ lawyer, told reporters that the reclassification of the facts was “difficult to understand” for the parents. She stated they were “shocked” by the judgment,which ”adds pain to pain,” and felt as though they were “losing their child twice.” Bourgade had previously expressed dismay, saying, ”who can put a drain cleaner in the mouth of a child and tell us that she did not want to kill him?” She had hoped for an appeal from the prosecutor’s office.
The defense team, julia Coppard and Maylis Leduc, also expressed surprise at the jury’s decision. However, they considered the qualifiers of torture and barbarism to be “adapted to this case.” They noted that while the sentence was severe, it was less than the prosecution’s request, indicating that “the personality elements of our client” were taken into account.
Details of the Crime
During police custody, Jaouen admitted to administering a corrosive liquid, a drain cleaner, to 11-month-old Lisa while the baby was in her care at “La Petite lisa.” Though, she denied intending to kill the child. This remained her defense throughout the trial, although she eventually clarified the sequence of events. After providing several different accounts, she admitted to holding the child’s head and pouring the product directly into her mouth, stating that she could no longer bear the baby’s crying.
Unanswered Questions Remain
Advocate general Baptiste Godreau questioned, “Eight minutes alone with a child when you graduate from an early childhood course, is it insurmountable?” He noted that the question of “why?” remained unanswered. Leduc countered, “What rational clarification is there to have sulfuric acid ingest to a child? There is none.”
Lisa’s death at a micro-crèche in the People & Baby group sparked widespread outrage and led to administrative,parliamentary,and journalistic investigations into the private crèche sector. However, the girl’s parents sought to keep this broader debate separate from the trial, which focused on Jaouen’s duty. Despite three days of hearings, neither Jaouen nor psychiatric experts could fully explain her actions.
Prosecution Appeals 25-Year Sentence in Baby Poisoning Case: Yoru Questions answered
This article provides answers to common questions surrounding teh Myriam Jaouen case,as presented in the provided information about her conviction and the subsequent appeal.
What is the Myriam Jaouen Case About?
The myriam Jaouen case concerns the poisoning of an 11-month-old baby named Lisa by a former nursery employee. Jaouen was convicted in 2022 and sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Why Did Prosecutors Appeal the Sentence?
Prosecutors in Lyon appealed the 25-year prison sentence, originally handed down to Myriam jaouen. They sought a 30-year sentence, including 20 years without the possibility of parole. The prosecution argued that the initial sentence wasn’t severe enough, and the provided content indicates they believed Jaouen intended to kill the child.
what Were the Original Charges and Verdict?
Jaouen was found guilty of “torture or acts of barbarism resulting in death without intent” by the Rhône Assize Court. The prosecution had requested a murder charge, which would have implied intent to kill, but the jury rejected this.
What Did the defense Argue?
The defense, represented by Julia Coppard and Maylis Leduc, expressed surprise at the jury’s decision regarding the initial verdict. However, they believed that the terms “torture” and “barbarism” were ”adapted to this case”. They also noted that the sentence, while severe, was less than the prosecution’s request indicating that the court considered the “personality elements” of the client.
How Did the Parents React to the verdict and Appeal?
The parents’ lawyer,Catherine Bourgade,stated that the parents were “shocked” by the initial judgment. They felt the reclassification of the facts was difficult to understand which “adds pain to pain,” and felt as though they were “losing their child twice.” She hoped for an appeal from the prosecutor’s office. Jean Sannier,the lawyer representing the civil party in the trial,noted that the family expressed feeling the verdict was a “second death” for their child.
What Were the details of the Crime?
Jaouen admitted to administering a corrosive liquid, a drain cleaner, to 11-month-old Lisa while the baby was in her care. Although she initially denied intending to kill Lisa, she later admitted to holding the child’s head and pouring the product directly into her mouth because, according to the article, she “could no longer bear the baby’s crying.”
What Were the Key Unanswered Questions in the Case?
The central unanswered question is “why?” advocate General baptiste Godreau questioned why Jaouen did what she did. The article highlights the difficulty in understanding why Jaouen would administer sulfuric acid to a child.
What Role did “La Petite Lisa” Play?
“La Petite Lisa” (the name of the childcare center) is the location where the crime occurred. The death of the child at the micro-crèche sparked widespread outrage.
Overview of the Case
below is a summary of the key events and actors involved in the Myriam Jaouen case:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Defendant | Myriam Jaouen, a former nursery employee |
| Victim | 11-month-old Lisa |
| Crime | Administering drain cleaner to the baby, resulting in her death. |
| Initial Verdict | Guilty of “torture or acts of barbarism resulting in death without intent”; 25-year prison sentence |
| Prosecution’s Request | 30-year sentence, with 20 years without parole. |
| Appeal | Prosecutors appealed the initial 25-year sentence. |
| Defense Argument | The defense considered the terms “torture” and “barbarism” adapted to this case. |
| Parents’ Reaction | Shocked and disappointed with the initial verdict, hopeful of an appeal. |