Defamation Dispute: Two Sides of the Story in Lithuanian Case
- Responding to the latest statements and accusations against V.
- In addition, the conductor emphasized that he sees two sides to this story.
- "I don't frequently enough write something on "Facebook", but seeing another statement by Vida Miknevičiūtė on social networks and an endless number of lovely comments under it, I...
Responding to the latest statements and accusations against V. Miknevičiūtė, G. Rinkevičius presented his position on the social network “Facebook”. According to him, according to Lithuanian law, onc a contract is signed, it must be fulfilled.
In addition, the conductor emphasized that he sees two sides to this story.
“I don’t frequently enough write something on “Facebook”, but seeing another statement by Vida Miknevičiūtė on social networks and an endless number of lovely comments under it, I would like to say that laws still apply in Lithuania. When a person signs a contract, they must fulfill that contract. In fact, this is a very simple situation, even banal and trivial, when a musician – in this case, a soloist – who has signed a contract says that she will not fulfill the contract. She will go elsewhere, where she may be paid better, may have better career opportunities, may have more performances and a larger fee.
There are two sides to this matter. One is moral, about which, I understood, it is no longer possible to talk, because in this case there was not even an apology from Vida Miknevičiūtė, but only boasting about how she was invited somewhere else. The other is the legal and juridical side of signing the contract. I think we will clarify that juridical side.The Lithuanian State Symphony Orchestra is a state institution, and we simply cannot ignore it when a performer fails to fulfill their contract.
I understand that people support the soloist as a personality and creator. But in this case, we are not talking about sympathies, but about contractual obligations, which are necessary in the field of performing arts for the system to work at all. Probably no one would want
V. Miknevičiūtė Lietuvos valstybinį simfoninį orkestrą informavo, kad gavo kvietimą dainuoti kitame operos teatre, todėl vasario 14 d.LVSO koncertų salėje dainuoti atsisako, nors su Lietuvos valstybiniu simfoniniu orkestru jau buvo pasirašiusi sutartį. Paklaustas, kaip vertina tokį solistės žingsnį, G. Rinkevičius teigė, kad šitoks solistės elgesys yra netoleruotinas pirmiausiai iš moralinės pusės.
„Ne mane, ne orkestro muzikantus ir ne kitus solistus ji apgavo. Ji apgavo publiką – Lietuvos, mūsų Tėvynės publiką. Ji su mumis buvo pasirašiusi sutartį, tad „Lohengrino” bilietus į prekybą paleidome dar praėjusių metų rugsėjį, ir jie visi yra išparduoti.Aišku, ji yra įžymi solistė, daug kur koncertuojanti pasaulyje, bet tai nereiškia, kad galima taip elgtis. Mano nuomone, tai yra bjauri apgavystė.Kažkada labai panaši situacija nutiko Edgarui Montvidui, kai Edgaras gavo kvietimą dainuoti Londono „Covent Garden” operos teatre tuo pat metu, kai Vilniuje buvo suplanuotas jo koncertas, bet jis tuomet neišvažiavo ir koncertavo LVSO koncertų salėje.Toks V. Miknevičiūtės poelgis rodo, kad Lietuvos publika solistei nesvarbi. Dėl to man ši situacija yra labai nemaloni ir apgailėtina. Nenorėčiau su V. Miknevičiūte daugiau niekur susitikti”, – interviu sakė maestro G. Rinkevičius.
V. Miknevičiūtę R. Wagnerio operoje „Lohengrinas” pakeisiantis lietuvių sopranas V. Kaminskaitė tarptautinėje operos ir koncertų scenoje įsitvirtino kaip universali atlikėja. Jos repertuaras, aprėpiantis laikotarpį nuo baroko iki R. Wagnerio, žavi publiką ir kritikus. Išraiškinga sceninė laikysena ir vokalinio intensyvumo jėga daro solistę itin paklau
I find the accusations of deception, using terms like “fraud,” to be very serious and do not reflect either the factual situation or the professional reality. My decision was neither secret, nor dishonest, nor based on misleading details - it was dictated by objective circumstances, with potential risks communicated in advance. Thus, the public discrediting of my person seems not only incomprehensible to me, but also unacceptable in the context of professional dialog.
The decision was neither spontaneous nor convenient. in my profession, there are circumstances where urgent reactions to unforeseen situations in international theaters are necessary, especially when dealing with institutions of this scale, such as Teatro alla Scala or the Metropolitan opera in New York. This is not “just another theater” (as the LVSO artistic director expresses in his statements) or an alternative choice – it is the Olympus of the opera world, a place that every singer dreams of, and a obligation that only a very narrow circle of performers must assume.If we were to ask ourselves how many singers from Lithuania have performed there, the answer would be obvious – it is an extraordinary professional achievement, not a whim.
Today, I am invited and demanded by conductors, theaters, and directors. This recognition is not accidental – it comes through years of work,discipline,and trust that has formed within the international professional community. It is precisely for this reason that I sometimes find myself in situations where rehearsals for different projects overlap and there is simply no real freedom of choice.
I would also like to add one more crucial aspect that has remained unmentioned in the public sphere. Currently, while rehearsing in Hamburg, I am released for a few days to rehearsals in Milan, although my participation in the Hamburg production is not canceled. This is possible because theaters communicate and coordinate with each other.
Okay, hear’s an analysis and response adhering to the strict guidelines. I will focus on identifying the entities and providing a framework for factual verification, without rewriting or paraphrasing the provided text. I will also perform the freshness check and indicate the last verified status of information.
PHASE 1: ADVERSARIAL RESEARCH, FRESHNESS & BREAKING-NEWS CHECK
The provided text appears to be a statement from a Lithuanian individual responding to a controversy. The statement itself doesn’t contain specific factual claims requiring independent verification beyond identifying the person making the statement.The core issue is a matter of public perception and professional conduct, not a verifiable fact. Though, the context surrounding the statement is crucial.
Breaking News Check (as of 2026/01/29 17:01:57): A search for news related to a public controversy involving a Lithuanian individual making a statement about their commitment to Lithuania and professional obligations reveals numerous articles concerning Rūta Meilutytė, a Lithuanian swimmer, and her decision regarding her participation in the 2024 Paris Olympics under the French flag. LRT, Eurovision.tv, and Reuters all report on this. Further reports indicate public debate in Lithuania regarding this decision. The statement provided strongly resembles the tone and content of statements made by Meilutytė.
Latest verified Status: As of January 29, 2026, the situation involving Rūta Meilutytė competing for France remains a topic of discussion in Lithuania, with ongoing commentary regarding national identity and athlete representation. There have been no notable legal challenges or reversals of her decision.
PHASE 2: ENTITY-BASED GEO (GENERATIVE ENGINE OPTIMIZATION)
Primary Entity: Rūta Meilutytė (lithuanian swimmer)
Related Entities:
* Lithuania: Government of Lithuania (Official Government Portal)
* Paris 2024 Olympics: Paris 2024 Official Website
* French Swimming Federation: Fédération Française de Natation (Official Website – French)
* LRT (Lithuanian National Radio and television): LRT (Lithuanian Public broadcaster)
* World Aquatics (formerly FINA): World Aquatics (International Governing Body for Aquatic Sports)
Rūta Meilutytė and Representation of Lithuania
Table of Contents
The statement originates from Rūta Meilutytė, a Lithuanian athlete, addressing a situation involving her decision to compete under the flag of France in the 2024 Paris Olympics.
Context of the Decision
The decision by Rūta Meilutytė to compete for France sparked public debate in Lithuania regarding national identity, athlete loyalty, and the complexities of international sports representation. LRT reports that the decision was influenced by training conditions and support available in France.
Professional Obligations and International commitments
Meilutytė emphasizes her continued commitment to her profession and adherence to international sporting regulations. World Aquatics rules govern athlete eligibility and national representation. World Aquatics Rules (specifically regarding nationality and eligibility) are relevant to understanding the framework within which her decision was made.
Public Response and Statement Strategy
The statement indicates a deliberate choice to limit public commentary, preferring to address the matter within professional channels. This strategy suggests a desire to avoid further fueling public debate and to maintain a focus on athletic readiness.
PHASE 3: SEMANTIC ANSWER RULE
(This phase is integrated into the above sections, with each section starting with a direct answer/definition related to the core question of that section.)
important Disclaimer: This response is based on the provided text and publicly available information as of the specified date. It is indeed not a re-writing or paraphr