Diddy Trial: Ex-Girlfriend Testifies About “Freak Offs” as Consensual Encounters

⁤ ‍Updated June 11, 2025
​

Prosecutors⁤ in the Sean “Diddy” Combs case have presented evidence of drug-influenced,⁣ extended sexual encounters, dubbed “freak offs,” as ⁢central to an alleged criminal conspiracy. Though, during cross-examination, Diddy’s defense⁢ team sought to ​reframe these encounters as consensual. The focus remained on the testimony of Diddy’s ex-girlfriend, identified as “Jane,” as ⁣the trial continued.

Defense attorney Teny‌ Geragos‍ questioned Jane ‌about the nature of these encounters. Jane admitted to initiating​ some of ‌the “freak⁢ offs.” Photos were presented showing a room decorated by⁤ Jane with rose petals and balloons. She confirmed suggesting a “hotel night”‌ involving two other men, stating Diddy⁢ was ⁤receptive to the idea.

in‍ August 2022, Jane texted Diddy expressing her enjoyment of their sexual‌ encounters, which included a sex⁤ worker named ⁣Paul. She assured Diddy ​that‌ she would “never take this for granted and will always make sure you are‌ taken care of.”

Jane​ became emotional while recounting a text message where ​she called Diddy a “blessing.” She had writen ⁢to ⁢Diddy, ‍”I have never had‌ a man take care of‌ me like you do,”​ a day after one ⁤of ⁢their “hotel nights,” ​adding,⁤ “You’re the reason for my ⁢child’s ⁣joy, it means the world to us, I love you baby.”

Jane also ⁣testified about encouraging Diddy to abstain ⁣from ⁤drugs and adopt a healthier diet for 30 ​days. Diddy⁢ proposed a “sobriety party,” which⁤ she ​described as a “hotel night” without drugs. This‌ party, held in October 2023, involved Jane having sex with three men over 12 to ⁣18 hours. “I resent him for how much I​ loved him and couldn’t say no ⁤to him,” she said. ‌”I⁤ resent⁤ him for all of⁢ it.” The trial continues to⁤ explore the nature of⁢ these relationships and their impact on the case against Diddy, focusing on ‌the issue‌ of consent ‌and the ⁤influence of drugs.

“I resent him for ​how much I‍ loved him and⁣ couldn’t say no to him. ⁢I resent him for all of‌ it.”
⁤ ⁣

Meanwhile, prosecutors are seeking the removal of ⁢Juror #6, one of the Black members of the panel, ⁤based on what they​ described as a “lack of ‍candor.” Prosecutor Maurene Comey stated, “We were ⁤very reluctant to put in this letter. It ‌appeared to be⁤ a lack‌ of candor with the ⁢court ‌that raises serious issues with us. We did not wont​ to do this.We were compelled to do that.”

What’s next

Jane is expected to continue her ‌testimony‌ under cross-examination. The trial will ​continue to examine⁤ the ⁤details ‍surrounding the ‍alleged criminal conspiracy and the nature of the⁢ relationships involved.