Dr. Hashim Abdah Hashim: The Article That Upset Sheikh Ibn Baz
- An incident involving an article, Sheikh Ibn Baz, and a summons for clarification.
- After a session as a member of the Shura Council, an individual was called to Sheikh Ibn Baz's office.
- The individual was informed of the requirement to meet with Sheikh Ibn Baz.
Ibn Baz and the Article That Stirred Controversy: A story of Reconciliation
Table of Contents
- Ibn Baz and the Article That Stirred Controversy: A story of Reconciliation
- Ibn Baz and teh Article That Stirred Controversy: A Story of Reconciliation
- What was the controversy surrounding Ibn Baz and the published article?
- What was Sheikh Ibn Baz’s reaction to the controversial statement?
- who were the key figures involved in resolving the Ibn Baz controversy?
- How was the controversy with Ibn baz resolved?
- Why was the statement about President Clinton considered problematic?
- What role did Sheikh Saleh Al-Luhaidan play in the Ibn Baz incident?
- Timeline of events: Ibn Baz Controversy
An incident involving an article, Sheikh Ibn Baz, and a summons for clarification.
The Summons
The narrative unfolds with a summons. After a session as a member of the Shura Council, an individual was called to Sheikh Ibn Baz’s office. Upon entering, the immediate question was direct: وش المصيبة اللي سويتها؟
(“What calamity have you committed?”). This set the stage for a discussion regarding an article that had caused considerable concern.
Article Review and Contentious statement
The individual was informed of the requirement to meet with Sheikh Ibn Baz. The question arose, هل قرأت المقال قبل النشر؟
(“Did you read the article before publishing it?”). The response was affirmative. The core issue revolved around a specific sentence: إن الرئيس الأمريكي الجديد كلينتون يتصرف وكأنه يدير شؤون هذا الكون
(“The new American President Clinton acts as if he runs the affairs of this universe”).
Demands for Repentance
The implications of the statement were profound. When asked,ماذا بها؟
(“What’s wrong with it?”),the response indicated a serious theological concern. The statement coudl be interpreted as associating partners with God, thus necessitating repentance. Moreover,it was revealed that prince Naif was closely following the matter,emphasizing the need for a meeting with Sheikh Ibn Baz alongside Sheikh Saleh Al-Luhaidan.
Containing the Situation
The meeting with Sheikh Ibn Baz was intense. The situation escalated, but the tact and diplomacy of Sheikh Saleh played a crucial role in de-escalation. Sheikh Ibn Baz expressed strong disapproval, stating, هذا كفر وتجني
(“This is disbelief and an injustice”). An apology was offered, and Sheikh Saleh intervened, characterizing the statement as a slip of the pen from a diligent individual, which ultimately helped contain the situation.
Repentance and Apology
Sheikh Ibn Baz communicated that a statement of repentance would be issued. This statement,along with an apology,was published in its entirety in the second part of the book “Kings,Presidents,and Personalities.” This act signified a formal resolution and a commitment to rectifying the perceived transgression.
Key Figures
- Ibn Baz: A prominent figure in Saudi Arabia, serving as the Grand Mufti.
- Sheikh Saleh Al-Luhaidan: Played a crucial role in mediating and de-escalating the situation.
- prince Naif: Showed concern and facilitated the meeting to address the issue.
Timeline of Events
| Event | Description |
|---|---|
| Article publication | An article containing a statement about President clinton was published. |
| summons | The author was summoned to Sheikh Ibn Baz’s office. |
| Meeting with Ibn Baz | A meeting was held with Sheikh Ibn Baz and Sheikh Saleh Al-Luhaidan. |
| Repentance Statement | A statement of repentance was issued and published. |