EFF Condemns FBI Search of Washington Post Reporter’s Home
- A coalition of press freedom and civil liberties groups has sent a letter to the Biden management expressing concerns about the Federal Bureau of Inquiry's (FBI) use of...
- The FBI's surveillance practices, specifically its use of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), are at the center of the concerns.
- The justice Department's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report in March 2024 reviewing the FBI's use of Section 702 collection authorities,finding instances where the FBI...
A coalition of press freedom and civil liberties groups has sent a letter to the Biden management expressing concerns about the Federal Bureau of Inquiry’s (FBI) use of surveillance powers, notably regarding the collection of Americans’ data without a warrant. The letter urges the administration to adopt reforms to protect Frist Amendment rights.
FBI Surveillance Powers and Section 702
Table of Contents
The FBI’s surveillance practices, specifically its use of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), are at the center of the concerns. Section 702 allows the FBI to collect communications of foreign targets located outside the United States, but this collection often incidentally captures data of U.S. citizens. The letter argues that current safeguards are insufficient to protect Americans’ privacy.
The justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report in March 2024 reviewing the FBI’s use of Section 702 collection authorities,finding instances where the FBI improperly queried the database for U.S. person data. Review of the FBI’s Use of Section 702 Collection Authorities, Office of the Inspector General, March 2024.
American Civil liberties Union (ACLU) Concerns
The ACLU has been a vocal critic of Section 702 and the FBI’s surveillance practices. The association argues that the law allows for “backdoor searches” of Americans’ communications without a warrant, violating the Fourth Amendment. The ACLU maintains that these searches chill free speech and association.
In December 2023, the ACLU released a report detailing ongoing abuses of surveillance powers by the FBI,including warrantless searches of Americans’ data. the report highlighted the need for stronger legal protections.
Press Freedom Groups’ Position
Organizations like PEN America and the Society of Professional Journalists argue that the FBI’s surveillance practices have a chilling effect on journalism. They contend that journalists may be less likely to report on sensitive topics or protect their sources if they fear government surveillance. this directly impacts the First Amendment right to freedom of the press.
PEN America, in a 2023 report, documented instances where journalists have faced surveillance or intimidation by government agencies, hindering their ability to report freely.the report emphasized the importance of protecting journalistic sources and communications.
NewsGuild-CWA and Labor Concerns
The NewsGuild-CWA, representing journalists and media workers, expressed concern that FBI surveillance could target union organizing efforts and suppress workers’ rights. They argue that surveillance of communications between workers and their representatives could violate labor laws.
The NewsGuild-CWA has actively advocated for stronger privacy protections for journalists and media workers, arguing that surveillance chills free speech and hinders the ability of workers to organise and advocate for better working conditions. As of January 19, 2026, there have been no significant updates to the FBI’s surveillance policies addressing these concerns.