Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Epic Must Face Monopoly Claims | STAT - News Directory 3

Epic Must Face Monopoly Claims | STAT

September 8, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
  • In a significant legal challenge, Epic Systems, teh leading electronic health record (EHR) vendor, will face antitrust claims alleging it illegally‍ leveraged its market dominance ‍to stifle competition...
  • Particle Health alleges that Epic unlawfully maintained its monopoly position by hindering its ⁢ability ⁣to compete in the market for providing data feeds to health insurers.
  • Epic Systems holds ⁢a commanding share of the EHR market,⁣ serving⁢ a vast network of hospitals and healthcare providers.According to ⁢a 2023 ⁢report by Health Affairs, Epic's market...
Original source: statnews.com

“`html

Epic Systems Faces Antitrust lawsuit Over Alleged Monopoly Practices

Table of Contents

  • Epic Systems Faces Antitrust lawsuit Over Alleged Monopoly Practices
    • Background: epic’s Dominance in the EHR Market
    • The Allegations: Monopoly⁤ and Anti-Competitive Conduct
    • The Court’s⁢ Ruling and Next Steps

In a significant legal challenge, Epic Systems, teh leading electronic health record (EHR) vendor, will face antitrust claims alleging it illegally‍ leveraged its market dominance ‍to stifle competition from Particle Health, a company serving health insurers. Judge Naomi Buchwald of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled on Friday, February ‍9, 2024, allowing key claims under ⁤the Sherman Antitrust Act ‍to proceed. Law360 ‍reported ⁢on the ruling.

What: Antitrust lawsuit against epic Systems.
⁣ ⁤
Where: united States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
‍
When: Ruling issued February 9, 2024.
‍ ⁣
Why it matters: Could reshape competition in the EHR market and impact data access for health ⁢insurers.
⁣
What’s⁤ next: Epic will face finding ⁢and must turn over relevant documents.

Particle Health alleges that Epic unlawfully maintained its monopoly position by hindering its ⁢ability ⁣to compete in the market for providing data feeds to health insurers. The lawsuit centers‍ on Epic’s control over patient data and its alleged efforts to limit access for companies like Particle Health. While Judge Buchwald dismissed claims of contract interference, defamation, and trade ⁢libel, the core antitrust allegations will ⁣move forward.

Background: epic’s Dominance in the EHR Market

Epic Systems holds ⁢a commanding share of the EHR market,⁣ serving⁢ a vast network of hospitals and healthcare providers.According to ⁢a 2023 ⁢report by Health Affairs, Epic’s market share among hospitals is approximately 29%, substantially larger than its ⁣closest competitors, Cerner (now Oracle Health) and Meditech.

Source: Health Affairs
EHR Vendor Hospital Market Share (2023)
Epic Systems 29%
Oracle Health (formerly Cerner) 24%
Meditech 16%
All Other Vendors 31%

This dominance gives Epic substantial control over⁤ patient ⁢data, which is increasingly valuable for ⁣purposes such as population health management, research, and value-based⁢ care. Particle Health sought to facilitate data exchange between providers using epic systems and health insurers,⁣ offering a streamlined solution for accessing patient information.

The Allegations: Monopoly⁤ and Anti-Competitive Conduct

Particle Health’s lawsuit,‍ filed in November 2023, accuses Epic of engaging in⁣ anti-competitive practices to protect its market position. Specifically,‍ Particle alleges that Epic leveraged its⁤ control over EHR⁤ data to create barriers to entry for competitors. The full⁣ complaint is available on CourtListener.

The core ‍of the argument rests on Section 2 of the Sherman⁢ Antitrust Act, which prohibits ‍monopolies and attempts ⁤to monopolize.Particle contends that Epic’s actions constitute an illegal attempt to maintain its monopoly power by ‍preventing the development of a ⁣competitive data exchange market.

The Court’s⁢ Ruling and Next Steps

Judge Buchwald’s ruling, issued on February⁣ 9, 2024, allows Particle Health to proceed with its Sherman ⁤Act claims. The judge found that Particle had presented sufficient evidence to suggest that Epic engaged in monopolistic conduct. However, the court dismissed claims related to contract interference, defamation, and trade libel, finding⁢ that Particle had not adequately demonstrated these allegations. The full ruling can be found here (PDF).

The case now enters the discovery

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Worth a look

  • Tick Infestations Forecast to Spike This Summer
  • Understanding and Overcoming Cancer Cachexia: A New Hope for Cancer Patients
  • South Africa probes death of Nigerian national amid police brutality claims (time.news)

Related

health tech

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com