Expat Diaries: Black Americans in Asia

Expat Diaries: Black Americans in Asia

October 21, 2025 Marcus Rodriguez - Entertainment Editor Entertainment

This code snippet represents a series of <source> tags within an <picture> element (though the <picture> ​tag itself is missing). It’s designed for responsive images, meaning‌ the browser will choose the ​best image source based on the viewport width. Let’s break down ⁢what’s happening and identify some issues:

What ‌it’s trying to do:

The code ‍aims to provide different image sources (and sizes)​ depending on the screen size. the srcset attribute specifies the image URLs and ⁣their⁣ corresponding pixel densities (1x and 2x, indicating standard and high-resolution images for retina displays). The media attribute defines the conditions (viewport width) ‌under wich each ‍source should be used.

Problems and Redundancies:

  1. Repetitive and ⁢Incorrect ⁣ srcset: ​ The⁢ vast‌ majority of the <source> tags are identical. They all point to the same image (https://www.essence.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Sha-Cannon-Dragon-Bridge-over-Han-River-Da-Nang-Vietnam-scaled.jpg) with the same 1x and 2x options. This defeats the purpose of responsive images. ‌You⁢ want‍ different images⁤ for different screen sizes, ideally ‌optimized ⁣for those sizes.
  1. Incorrect Media Queries: The media attributes are mostly nonsensical.​ min-width: 4x3px, ‍ min-width: 1x1px, min-width: 3x2px, ​ min-width: 2x3px, min-width: 136x91px, and min-width: nonepx are ⁤not valid or​ useful media query values. Media queries should use standard units like px, ⁢ em, rem, or ⁤viewport⁣ units ‌like vw and vh. none is also not a valid value for min-width.
  1. Missing <picture> Tag: the code is incomplete. All these <source> tags must be enclosed within a ⁣ <picture> tag. ‍ There also needs to be an <img> ⁣tag inside the <picture> tag as a fallback for browsers that don’t​ support <picture>.
  1. Inconsistent ⁤Use of width: The last few <source> ‍ tags do ⁤use the width parameter in the ⁢ srcset (e.g.,​ ?width=800). ‍This is⁢ a better approach, but it’s inconsistent with the rest of the code. ​Using width is generally preferred over pixel density (1x, ⁣2x) because it ⁢allows the browser to choose the best image size based on the viewport.
  1. Future date in URL: The URL includes “2025/10”. This suggests the⁢ image hasn’t been published yet, or​ the date is incorrect.

Corrected ‍and Simplified Example:

Here’s a much more‍ reasonable ⁢example of how ‌to use <picture> for responsive images:

“`html