Expert Rebukes Swiss Hospital for Monitoring Patients with Cameras
- A plan by the Kantonsspital Olten (KSO) in Switzerland to implement video surveillance for the monitoring of patients has been rejected by data protection authorities, who labeled the...
- The hospital had proposed the installation of cameras in patient rooms to monitor individuals deemed high-risk, specifically those suffering from dementia or those with a significant risk of...
- The proposal drew the attention of the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (EDÖB), the Swiss authority responsible for overseeing privacy and data protection laws.
A plan by the Kantonsspital Olten (KSO) in Switzerland to implement video surveillance for the monitoring of patients has been rejected by data protection authorities, who labeled the measure as disproportionate.
The hospital had proposed the installation of cameras in patient rooms to monitor individuals deemed high-risk, specifically those suffering from dementia or those with a significant risk of falling. According to reporting by Watson, the hospital intended for the system to serve as a safety measure, allowing staff to oversee patients without requiring a physical presence in the room at all times.
The proposal drew the attention of the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (EDÖB), the Swiss authority responsible for overseeing privacy and data protection laws. Following a review of the plan, the EDÖB pushed back against the implementation of the surveillance system.

The commissioner determined that the constant video monitoring of patients in their private hospital rooms constitutes a severe intrusion into the personal sphere. The authority argued that the right to privacy remains a priority even within a clinical environment, and that the proposed surveillance exceeded what is legally permissible under Swiss data protection standards.
Kantonsspital Olten had defended the initiative by citing the need to prevent accidents and reduce the physical and mental burden on nursing staff. The hospital argued that the cameras would provide a critical safety net for confused patients who might attempt to leave their beds or wander, potentially leading to injuries.
However, the EDÖB maintained that the benefit of such monitoring does not outweigh the loss of privacy for the patients. The authority indicated that the hospital must seek less invasive alternatives to achieve the same safety goals. Potential alternatives typically include the use of bed sensors, motion detectors, or increased staffing levels, which do not involve the recording or live streaming of a patient’s private space.
The ruling highlights a growing tension in European healthcare between the integration of surveillance technology for patient safety and the strict adherence to data privacy laws. Under Swiss law, any measure that infringes upon personal privacy must be necessary, proportional, and the least intrusive means available to achieve the intended goal.
The decision forces the Kantonsspital Olten to abandon or significantly modify its surveillance strategy to align with the legal requirements set forth by the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner.
