Extraordinary Period in Chamber of Deputies: Ricardo Monreal
Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies Plans Remarkable Session for Key Reforms
Table of Contents
- Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies Plans Remarkable Session for Key Reforms
- Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies Plans Remarkable Session for Key Reforms
- Decoding Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies’ Upcoming Session: Key Reforms,US Relations,and More
- frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- What are the key legislative priorities for the upcoming extraordinary session of Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies?
- When Could These Approvals Happen?
- What specific laws are under consideration for amendment?
- What is the significance of Ricardo Monreal Ávila’s role in these legislative efforts?
- Why is the U.S.Ambassador’s statement causing controversy, and what is Mexico’s response?
- What are the constitutional reforms (articles 40 and 19) mentioned in response to the U.S.ambassador’s comments?
- Could you elaborate on the comments made by the U.S. Ambassador and Ricardo Monreal Avila’s Response?
- What is a “declaration of origin” in the context of Mexican law, and how does it differ from a political trial?
- What is the status of the case involving Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco?
- What safeguards are in place to ensure due process and prevent impunity in these cases?
- Why is an extraordinary session necessary for the Chamber of Deputies?
- What are the political implications of these legislative efforts and the response to the U.S. Ambassador?
- Summary of Key Pending Legislation
- frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Lawmakers aim to tackle pending legislation,including public safety adn digital services,amidst constitutional considerations.
Legislative Priorities and Pending Reforms
The Chamber of Deputies is gearing up for an extraordinary period of sessions to address a backlog of crucial reforms. Ricardo Monreal Ávila,president of the Political Coordination Board (Jucopo),stated the necessity of this session,noting,”as we have not managed to get all the reforms we need.”
On June 13, two notable initiatives were introduced. These include a law concerning the “Law of Procurement, Leases and Services of the Public Sector,” which proposes amendments to the Federal Law of Republican Austerity, the Law of Social Economy and Solidarity, and the Law of Cooperative Societies. Additionally, revisions to the Federal Law of Public Works and Services are under consideration.
Several key pieces of legislation remain pending, including those related to public safety, research and intelligence, security law, transparency (already endorsed by the Senate), and digital services, which involves modifications to the Political Constitution.
Ávila emphasized the importance of reviewing these norms: ”Yes, we have a cluster of constitutional and legal norms that we must study and review the viability of its modification, whether legal or constitutional, but it is sure that there is an extraordinary period.”
Potential Approvals and Timelines
Speaking to the media, the coordinator of the Parliamentary Group of Morena expressed optimism that the transparency law and the two public security laws could be debated and approved soon. He elaborated, “These three of insurance and the three that arrived yesterday just the commissions will rule together with that of digital services. So, we could take them out next week, the last week of March.”
Response to U.S. ambassador’s Statements
The upcoming U.S. ambassador to Mexico has stirred debate with recent comments. Deputy ricardo Monreal addressed the situation,stating,”We tell Ambassador Johnson – who is not aware - that we do not coincide with his expressions and his sayings expressed yesterday in an appearance in Congress.”
Monreal Ávila highlighted recent constitutional reforms, specifically articles 40 and 19, which address preventive detention for terrorists and those involved in arms trafficking from the U.S. He asserted that these reforms also apply to those acting outside the law.
“His saying is not supported by the constitution and from the promulgation that I hope will happen these days, when it is currently right, we will send the article amended to the ambassador where any interference, interference, disturbance of sovereignty or our internal affairs is prohibited. So it is that I understand that it is because it does not have the due data of what the Mexican Congress is carrying out,” he added.
Monreal Ávila further stated, “We will send a copy of the official Gazette of the Federation where these two articles that prohibit any interference, interference, disturbance of the Mexican internal regime and our national legal order have been modified. I think that with that enough for the good understanding to assume more careful and more respectful behavior to our country.”
Declaration of Origin and Pending Cases
addressing the deadlines of the Instructor Section, Monreal Ávila assured that “nothing will stay in Limbo; Everything that is pending in the chamber of Deputies is going to be attended, it will be resolved and, in this case, any action you have and whose terms are running, will be respected.”
he noted the 60-day timeframe for commission rulings and mentioned the case of Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco: “But at this time the files that were sent from the Attorney General’s Office of Morelos are available to the examination Subcommittee, in the case of Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco, and once it concludes the process of admission and revision, the law establishes that the elements will have to be specified by each of the members and define themselves so that the plenary ultimately resolves.”
He clarified that the end of the ordinary period in April does not halt these processes: “No, as they are fatal deadlines and by separate rope; It does not have to do with the termination or beginning of the session period, they are procedures that are carried out by separate rope, and we have told the commission to continue their work as the Organic Law and the Constitution establishes it.”
Monreal Ávila distinguished a declaration of origin from a political trial, explaining that the former aims to remove procedural immunity from an official facing denouncement by a Prosecutor’s Office. He cited three past cases where procedural immunity was removed, emphasizing, “Then, there has been no impunity or protection for anyone. I say it with all honesty. there is no mantle of impunity against anyone and I do not prejudge anyone.”
He concluded by stating, “I am not a judge nor am I a public ministry to accuse anyone; I have no elements and it is not my function to judge or pursue crimes against a member of the Chamber or against an official referred to in constitutional article 110 and that establish procedural immunity in the case of governors, secretaries of state, senators, deputies, ministers of the Court, federal magistrates and federal judges.”
Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies Plans Remarkable Session for Key Reforms
Lawmakers aim to tackle pending legislation, including public safety and digital services, amidst constitutional considerations.
Legislative Priorities and Pending Reforms
The Chamber of Deputies is gearing up for an remarkable period of sessions to address a backlog of crucial reforms. Ricardo Monreal Ávila, president of the Political Coordination Board (Jucopo), stated the necessity of this session, noting, “as we have not managed to get all the reforms we need.”
On june 13, two notable initiatives were introduced. These include a law concerning the “Law of Procurement, Leases and Services of the Public Sector,” which proposes amendments to the Federal Law of Republican Austerity, the Law of Social Economy and Solidarity, and the Law of Cooperative Societies. Additionally, revisions to the Federal Law of Public Works and Services are under consideration.
Several key pieces of legislation remain pending, including those related to public safety, research and intelligence, security law, transparency (already endorsed by the Senate), and digital services, which involves modifications to the Political Constitution.
Ávila emphasized the importance of reviewing these norms: “Yes,we have a cluster of constitutional and legal norms that we must study and review the viability of its modification,whether legal or constitutional,but it is sure that there is an extraordinary period.”
Potential Approvals and Timelines
Speaking to the media, the coordinator of the parliamentary Group of Morena expressed optimism that the transparency law and the two public security laws could be debated and approved soon. He elaborated, “These three of insurance and the three that arrived yesterday just the commissions will rule together with that of digital services. So,we could take them out next week,the last week of March.”
Response to U.S. Ambassador’s Statements
the upcoming U.S. ambassador to Mexico has stirred debate with recent comments. Deputy Ricardo Monreal addressed the situation, stating, “We tell Ambassador Johnson - who is not aware – that we do not coincide with his expressions and his sayings expressed yesterday in an appearance in Congress.”
Monreal Ávila highlighted recent constitutional reforms, specifically articles 40 and 19, which address preventive detention for terrorists and those involved in arms trafficking from the U.S. He asserted that these reforms also apply to those acting outside the law.
“His saying is not supported by the constitution and from the promulgation that I hope will happen these days, when it is currently right, we will send the article amended to the ambassador where any interference, interference, disturbance of sovereignty or our internal affairs is prohibited. So it is indeed that I understand that it is as it does not have the due data of what the Mexican Congress is carrying out,” he added.
Monreal Ávila further stated, “We will send a copy of the official Gazette of the Federation where these two articles that prohibit any interference, interference, disturbance of the Mexican internal regime and our national legal order have been modified. I think that with that enough for the good understanding to assume more careful and more respectful behavior to our country.”
Declaration of Origin and Pending Cases
addressing the deadlines of the Instructor Section, Monreal Ávila assured that “nothing will stay in limbo; Everything that is pending in the chamber of Deputies is going to be attended, it will be resolved and, in this case, any action you have and whose terms are running, will be respected.”
He noted the 60-day timeframe for commission rulings and mentioned the case of Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco: “But at this time the files that were sent from the Attorney General’s Office of Morelos are available to the examination Subcommittee, in the case of Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco, and once it concludes the process of admission and revision, the law establishes that the elements will have to be specified by each of the members and define themselves so that the plenary ultimately resolves.”
He clarified that the end of the ordinary period in April does not halt these processes: “No, as they are fatal deadlines and by separate rope; It does not have to do with the termination or beginning of the session period, they are procedures that are carried out by separate rope, and we have told the commission to continue their work as the Organic Law and the Constitution establishes it.”
Monreal Ávila distinguished a declaration of origin from a political trial, explaining that the former aims to remove procedural immunity from an official facing denouncement by a Prosecutor’s Office. He cited three past cases where procedural immunity was removed, emphasizing, “Then, there has been no impunity or protection for anyone. I say it with all honesty. there is no mantle of impunity against anyone and I do not prejudge anyone.”
He concluded by stating, “I am not a judge nor am I a public ministry to accuse anyone; I have no elements and it is not my function to judge or pursue crimes against a member of the Chamber or against an official referred to in constitutional article 110 and that establish procedural immunity in the case of governors, secretaries of state, senators, deputies, ministers of the Court, federal magistrates and federal judges.”
Decoding Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies’ Upcoming Session: Key Reforms,US Relations,and More
frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What are the key legislative priorities for the upcoming extraordinary session of Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies?
The Chamber of Deputies is prioritizing a range of reforms during its extraordinary session. Key areas include revisions to the “Law of Procurement, Leases and Services of the Public Sector” and the federal Law of public Works and Services. Additionally, the chamber will address pending legislation related to public safety, research and intelligence, security law, transparency, and digital services. These digital service reforms may involve modifications to the Political Constitution.
When Could These Approvals Happen?
According to the coordinator of the Parliamentary Group of Morena,there is optimism that the transparency law and two public security laws could be debated and potentially approved soon. He indicated that these, along with the digital services legislation, could be addressed in the last week of March.
What specific laws are under consideration for amendment?
several laws are slated for potential amendment, including:
- The Law of Procurement, Leases and Services of the Public Sector
- The Federal Law of Republican Austerity
- The Law of Social Economy and Solidarity
- The Law of Cooperative Societies
- The Federal Law of Public Works and Services
What is the significance of Ricardo Monreal Ávila’s role in these legislative efforts?
Ricardo Monreal Ávila, as the president of the Political Coordination Board (Jucopo), plays a crucial role in steering these legislative efforts. His statement emphasizing the necessity of an extraordinary session highlights the importance of addressing the legislative backlog and pushing forward key reforms.
Why is the U.S.Ambassador’s statement causing controversy, and what is Mexico’s response?
The upcoming U.S. Ambassador to Mexico made comments that were perceived as interference in Mexico’s internal affairs. deputy Ricardo Monreal Ávila responded by emphasizing Mexico’s sovereignty and highlighting recent constitutional reforms (articles 40 and 19) addressing preventive detention for terrorists and arms traffickers. He stated that Mexico will send the ambassador a copy of the official gazette outlining these reforms, prohibiting any interference in Mexican affairs.
What are the constitutional reforms (articles 40 and 19) mentioned in response to the U.S.ambassador’s comments?
Articles 40 and 19 of the Mexican Constitution, as reformed, address preventive detention for individuals involved in terrorism and arms trafficking from the United States. These reforms assert Mexico’s authority to apply these measures to those acting outside the law within its borders. The perceived overreach and lack of awareness demonstrated by the ambassador prompted the strong rebuke and clarification.
Could you elaborate on the comments made by the U.S. Ambassador and Ricardo Monreal Avila’s Response?
The specific details of the U.S. Ambassador Johnson’s statements are not provided in the text. Though, Ricardo Monreal Avila stated that Ambassador Johnson is “not aware” and that the Chamber of Deputies does “not coincide with his expressions and sayings.” Monreal emphasizes that the Ambassador’s comments lack alignment with the Mexican Constitution, citing amendments meant to prohibit any action conflicting with Mexico’s internal affairs. The core message conveyed by Monreal is a firm stance against any perceived encroachment on mexican sovereignty.
What is a “declaration of origin” in the context of Mexican law, and how does it differ from a political trial?
A “declaration of origin” in Mexican law is a process aimed at removing procedural immunity (also known as *fuero*) from an official who is facing denouncement by a Prosecutor’s Office. It is distinct from a political trial. The purpose of a declaration of origin is to allow the legal process to proceed against the official by stripping away the protections that procedural immunity affords them. Monreal Ávila clarified that declaring the origin does not presuppose guilt but merely clears the way for investigations and potential legal action.
What is the status of the case involving Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco?
The files from the Attorney General’s Office of Morelos regarding Deputy Cuauhtémoc Blanco have been submitted to the Examination Subcommittee. The subcommittee will review the case, specify the relevant elements, and then members will define their positions. The plenary will ultimately resolve the matter. The case remains active despite the upcoming end of the ordinary period in April.
What safeguards are in place to ensure due process and prevent impunity in these cases?
Monreal Ávila emphasizes that deadlines are firm, proceedings are carried out independently, and the commission is bound by the Organic Law and the Constitution. He states that in past cases, procedural immunity has been removed, demonstrating that “there has been no impunity or protection for anyone.” he also noted that he does not prejudge anyone as it is not his place to fill the role of Judge or Public Ministry, so he does not pursue crimes personally.
Why is an extraordinary session necessary for the Chamber of Deputies?
Ricardo Monreal Ávila, president of the Political Coordination Board (Jucopo), stated that the extraordinary session is necessary because the Chamber of deputies has not managed to complete all the necessary reforms during the regular sessions. This session provides dedicated time to address the backlog of crucial legislation.
What are the political implications of these legislative efforts and the response to the U.S. Ambassador?
These legislative efforts reflect a concerted push to modernize and strengthen various sectors within Mexico, from public procurement to digital services. The strong response to the U.S. Ambassador’s statement signals a commitment to protecting Mexico’s sovereignty and independently shaping its legal and political landscape. This stance can resonate positively with nationalist sentiments within Mexico, but also has the potential to strain relations with the United States.
Summary of Key Pending Legislation
| Legislation Area | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement, Leases, and Services | Amendments to the “Law of Procurement, Leases and Services of the Public sector” that also incorporate Republican Austerity, Social Economy, and Cooperative Societies guidelines. | Under Consideration |
| Public Works and Services | Revisions to the Federal Law of Public Works and Services. | Under Consideration |
| Public Safety | Legislation related to improving public safety measures. | Pending Debate (with potential approval soon) |
| Research and Intelligence | Law governing activities regarding research and intelligence in Mexico. | Pending |
| Security Law | Overarching Security Law to address various law enforcement and security concerns. | Pending |
| Transparency | Legislation to enhance transparency in government operations. | Endorsed by the Senate, Pending Debate (with potential approval soon) |
| Digital Services | Modifications to the Political Constitution related to digital services. | Pending |