Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Specs & Comparison
exynos 2500 vs. Snapdragon 8 Elite: A Chip comparison
The upcoming Exynos 2500 and Snapdragon 8 Elite are poised to be major contenders in the mobile processor market. Both chips promise significant performance upgrades,but they take different approaches to achieve them. The Exynos 2500 is fabricated using Samsung Foundry’s 3nm GAA process,while the Snapdragon 8 Elite relies on TSMC’s first-generation 3nm node. Experts suggest TSMC’s process might be superior,but real-world testing is needed to confirm.
Diving into the CPU architecture, the Exynos 2500 boasts a 10-core setup: one Cortex-X925 core at 3.3GHz, two Cortex-A725 cores at 2.74GHz, five Cortex-A725 cores at 2.36GHz, and two Cortex-A520 cores at 1.8GHz. In contrast, the Snapdragon 8 Elite features an octa-core CPU with two prime Oryon (Phoenix L) cores clocked at 4.32GHz and five performance Oryon (Phoenix M) cores at 3.53GHz.
| Exynos 2500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
|---|---|---|
| Fabrication Process | 3nm GAA Samsung Foundry | 3nm TSMC |
| CPU | 10-Core: 1x Cortex-X925 @ 3.3 ghz + 2x Cortex-A725 @ 2.74 GHz + 5x Cortex-A725 @ 2.36 GHz + 2x Cortex-A520 @ 1.8 GHz | 8-Core: 2x Pheonix L @ 4.32GHz (prime) + 5x Pheonix M (Performance) @ 3.53 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 950 (AMD RDNA 3) | Adreno 830 |
| Display | 4K/WQUXGA @ 120Hz, HDR, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG | QHD+ @ 240Hz / 8K @ 30Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| RAM | LPDDR5X (Quad-Channel 16-bit 5,300MHz) | LPDDR5X |
| Storage | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| GNSS | BDS, galileo, GLONASS, Dual-Frequency GPS, QZSS | BDS, Galileo, GLONASS, Dual-Frequency GPS, NavIC, QZSS |
| Cellular Radio | 12.1Gbps Peak Download Speed | 10Gbps Peak Download Speed |
| Wi-fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
Leaked CPU benchmarks indicate the Exynos 2500 scores around 2,500 and 8,000 in Geekbench 6’s single and multi-core tests, respectively. This suggests it could be 15% faster than the Snapdragon 8 Elite in foldable phones, but 15% slower than the Snapdragon 8 elite in standard smartphones.
For graphics, the Exynos 2500 uses the Xclipse 950 GPU, based on AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture. Samsung claims it’s 50% more powerful than the previous generation, perhaps rivaling the Adreno 830 GPU in the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
In terms of AI performance, the Exynos 2500’s NPU boasts 59 TOPS. While Qualcomm hasn’t released precise figures for the Snapdragon 8 Elite, its AI performance is expected to be lower than the Snapdragon X Elite laptop chip’s 45 TOPS, giving Samsung’s chip an advantage in AI processing.
Both chips support LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage,along with multi-frequency GNSS,mmWave and sub-6GHz 5G networks,Wi-Fi 7,and USB 3.2 Type-C. Although the Snapdragon 8 Elite supports Bluetooth 6.0, many manufacturers are sticking with Bluetooth 5.4 in their flagship phones.
the Exynos 2500 and Snapdragon 8 Elite both support up to 320MP camera sensors with 8K 30fps HDR video recording. They also handle image processing from up to 108MP cameras with zero shutter lag. The Exynos 2500 can concurrently process images from one 64MP and one 32MP sensor, while the Snapdragon 8 Elite supports a 64MP+36MP dual-camera setup or three 48MP cameras.
both chips integrate 5G modems supporting mmWave and sub-6GHz 5G networks. The Exynos 2500 reaches peak download speeds of 12.1Gbps, compared to the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 10Gbps. Both also support NFC and UWB.
the Exynos 2500 appears to have a faster NPU and 5G modem, while the Snapdragon 8 Elite may offer a faster CPU and Bluetooth 6.0. Both chips are expected to have similar GPU power and comparable RAM, storage, and connectivity features. The chip comparison reveals that the Exynos 2500 and Snapdragon 8 elite are closely matched.