Fijian Identity Debate: NFP Support and Calls for Consultation

A debate over national identity in Fiji has intensified as the government, political parties, and traditional leaders weigh in on whether the term Fijian should serve as a common nationality for all citizens or be reserved exclusively for indigenous people.

The discussion is taking place within the context of a Constitutional Review Commission. The Great Council of Chiefs (GCC), an institution representing the culture, heritage, and identity of the iTaukei (indigenous Fijians), has proposed that the term Fijian be reserved solely for indigenous Fijians.

In addition to the identity debate, the GCC has proposed that Fiji’s status as a secular state be repealed and replaced with the word Christian. The council has also suggested the removal of protections related to sexual orientation and gender.

Political and Government Positions

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has expressed support for the use of the name Fijian as a common identity for all citizens of Fiji.

This position is shared by the National Federation Party (NFP). Leader of the NFP, Professor Biman Prasad, stated that the party fully supports Fijian as a common identity for all citizens, describing it as a source of unity that inculcates pride and patriotism.

Professor Prasad has warned that attempts to politicize national identity during the constitutional review process are deliberately being divisive.

Calls for Consultation and Consensus

Ratu Tevita Lutunauga Kapaiwai Uluilakeba Mara, the paramount chief of Lau Province and son of Fiji’s first prime minister, Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara, has called for the issue to be resolved through nationwide consultation and consensus.

Ratu Tevita argued that a common identity should not be forced upon the population, noting that the ethnic diversity of the country makes Fiji unique and must be protected.

Common identity in Fiji is one that touches the very soul of our nation and it deserves honest, respectful, and consultative resolution. We owe that much to each and every one who calls Fiji home

Ratu Tevita Mara

He emphasized the necessity of distinguishing between nationality and ethnicity, stating that the two are entirely different concepts and must be separated clearly, firmly, and without further delay.

The debate involves a choice between different historical designations. Under the 1997 Constitution, the term Fiji Islanders was used, while the 2013 Constitution adopted the term Fijians.

Reactions to GCC Proposals

The proposals put forward by the Great Council of Chiefs have faced criticism from various sectors. A former prime minister labeled the GCC’s proposal as racially divisive.

Civil society organizations have also expressed concern, stating that the proposed changes to identity, the state’s secular status, and protections for gender and sexual orientation would undermine equality and democratic principles.