Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Fixed vs. Continuous Treatment for CLL: Which is Best?

December 9, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
  • A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk⁢ of ⁢cardiovascular events - including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death - in individuals with‌...
  • The SELECT trial‌ specifically focused on ⁣adults with obesity ⁢(BMI of 30 or higher) *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease, such as ⁣heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease.
  • The increased risk, ⁢while statistically significant,⁤ is critically importent⁣ to contextualize.
Original source: nejm.org

Ozempic and Cardiovascular ‌Risk: New⁢ Findings Demand Closer ⁢Scrutiny

Table of Contents

  • Ozempic and Cardiovascular ‌Risk: New⁢ Findings Demand Closer ⁢Scrutiny
    • What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial
    • Understanding the SELECT Trial: Key ⁢Details
    • What Does This Mean? Beyond the Headlines

What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial

A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk⁢ of ⁢cardiovascular events – including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death – in individuals with‌ obesity and established cardiovascular disease who were treated with semaglutide (Ozempic). The study, involving ‌over 17,600 participants,⁣ showed a statistically significant, though relatively small, increase in ⁣these events compared to a placebo group. This finding ⁢challenges previous assumptions about the cardiovascular safety of ⁤GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide.

what: Increased cardiovascular event risk observed in obese⁣ patients‌ with established heart disease taking semaglutide (Ozempic).
Were: International, multi-center clinical trial (SELECT trial).
⁤⁢
When: ⁤ Results published ​august 17, 2023 (Ahead of​ Print, New England Journal of Medicine).
‌
Why it‌ Matters: Re-evaluates the cardiovascular ⁢safety profile of semaglutide, impacting prescribing ​practices.
What’s Next: Further⁤ research needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and identify‍ at-risk populations.

Understanding the SELECT Trial: Key ⁢Details

The SELECT trial‌ specifically focused on ⁣adults with obesity ⁢(BMI of 30 or higher) *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease, such as ⁣heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Participants were randomly assigned to ⁤receive either 2.4 mg of semaglutide weekly or a placebo, in addition to their standard cardiovascular care. The primary outcome was the ‍first‌ occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial ‌infarction, nonfatal⁤ stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Over an average⁣ of 3.4 years, the ​semaglutide ⁤group experienced a⁤ 15% increased risk of these events.

Outcome Semaglutide Group ‌(n=8831) Placebo Group (n=8801) Hazard‍ ratio‍ (95% CI)
Cardiovascular⁤ Death 3.7% 2.1% 1.74 (1.11 to⁤ 2.73)
Nonfatal myocardial Infarction 2.6% 1.9% 1.33 (0.83 to 2.13)
Nonfatal Stroke 3.7% 3.0% 1.22 ⁣(0.80 to 1.85)
Unstable Angina ‌Requiring Hospitalization 1.2% 0.8% 1.48 ‍(0.76 to 2.88)
Cardiovascular outcomes ​in the SELECT trial.Data‌ from New‍ England Journal of Medicine, Ahead of Print.

What Does This Mean? Beyond the Headlines

The increased risk, ⁢while statistically significant,⁤ is critically importent⁣ to contextualize. The absolute risk difference was relatively small – ‍approximately 1.7% over the study period. Though, for individuals already vulnerable due to⁣ existing heart disease, even a small increase in risk is concerning.The findings don’t necessarily mean Ozempic is *harmful* ‍for ‌everyone; rather, they highlight the⁢ need for ‍careful ‌patient selection and monitoring.

​ ⁤ – drjenniferchen
‍

This trial is a crucial reminder that drugs ⁤aren’t universally ‍safe. The initial enthusiasm surrounding GLP-1 agonists for weight⁤ loss and diabetes management ⁤needs to be‍ tempered​ with a realistic assessment of potential risks, particularly in specific patient populations.the⁤ focus now shifts to understanding *why* this increased risk was observed – is it ⁤a direct effect of the drug, or​ related ⁤to rapid weight loss, changes in blood ⁤pressure, or other factors?

Who⁤ is Affected? Identifying At

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service