Flavio Perchman on Peñarol’s Win, Opening Definition, and Fernández’s Yellow
National’s Perchman Discusses Title Chances, Criticizes Peñarol’s Win
MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay – National Vice President Flavio Perchman addressed the team’s chances in the Opening Tournament and weighed in on the incentives within Uruguayan football. He also expressed strong disapproval of peñarol’s recent victory over Defensor Sporting.
National’s Path to the Opening Title
National, currently holding 28 points, needs a victory against Defensor Sporting in their final match to have a shot at the Opening title.They also need Liverpool, the tournament leader with 29 points, to drop points against Cerro Largo.
When asked about the possibility of National offering incentives to Cerro Largo to secure a favorable result, Perchman responded cautiously. “I don’t know.I was never in a situation like that in soccer, I can’t tell you, I don’t know,” he said, according to El Espectador Deportes.
He acknowledged hearing about incentives from players, distinguishing between incentives to win and incentives to lose. “I always saw it from the outside as something very different in the incentive to win than the incentive to lose. It has nothing to do with,” Perchman stated.
Despite the uncertainty surrounding incentives, Perchman praised the integrity of Uruguayan players. “I think that in this case in uruguayan football there have been a lot of cases of what the nobility of the teams are, who always go to the front, all teams,” he said. He expressed confidence in Cerro Largo’s performance, stating, “I have no doubts… that Cerro Largo will make a very good game in Belvedere.”
“We have a chance,Cerro Largo is a hard team,” Perchman added.
Perchman’s Displeasure with Peñarol’s victory
Perchman didn’t hold back his feelings about Peñarol’s triumph over Defensor Sporting. “I whent to sleep with a recreooly,” he admitted, explaining National’s internal outlook: “We (National) have two tables: one the real one with all the teams and the other is the hand in hand with Peñarol.”
He criticized Defensor Sporting’s performance, especially after Peñarol’s Leo Coelho was sent off early in the match. “And he did not feel defender at any time…and I have crossed with several defender fans and were disappointed,” Perchman said.
He also questioned the marking on Leo Fernández’s goal. “Crazy, it’s Leo!” he exclaimed, suggesting a defensive lapse. “There is an crucial technical error, the defenders instead of leaving them sank in the area.And we already know what it is with the ball.”
“Crazy,do not make the goal Leo Fernández,” Perchman continued. “Then if he makes a splendid play, it comes out and pike it, applaud it; but Leo Fernández no, with spaces to get the shot so easy, no.”
Perchman also addressed Fernández’s actions toward referee Matías de Armas, stating, ”I think he had to have been expelled, because he was not accidental, he looked for him.” He speculated that Fernández wasn’t expelled due to Coelho’s earlier dismissal, echoing sentiments previously expressed by Peñarol President Ignacio Ruglio.
The National Vice President also pointed out that “Peñarol has two or three players who are all the day protesting the plays. And one is Leo.”
“The other day they forgave his life,” Perchman concluded about Fernández. “I understand that for Matías de Armas it is a complicated play to expel and leave Peñarol with 9.”
National Vice President Flavio perchman on Title Chances and Peñarol’s Victory: A Q&A
What’s the context of Flavio perchman’s comments?
Flavio Perchman, the Vice president of Club Nacional de Football, recently discussed the team’s prospects in the Opening tournament and offered his opinions on Uruguayan football in general. The discussion included Nacional’s chances of winning the title and his viewpoint on Peñarol’s recent victory over Defensor Sporting.
what are national’s chances of winning the Opening title?
According to the article, National needs a victory against Defensor Sporting in their final match to have a shot at the Opening title. They also require Liverpool, the tournament leader, to drop points against Cerro Largo.
What is National’s current position in the tournament?
National currently holds 28 points in the standings.
What did perchman say about potentially offering incentives to Cerro Largo?
Perchman responded cautiously to the question of National offering incentives to Cerro Largo. He stated, “I don’t know. I was never in a situation like that in soccer, I can’t tell you, I don’t know.”
What are Perchman’s views on incentives in football?
Perchman acknowledged that he had heard about incentives from players and distinguished between incentives offered to win versus incentives to lose. He noted, “I always saw it from the outside as something very different in the incentive to win than the incentive to lose. it has nothing to do with.”
What did Perchman say about the integrity of Uruguayan players?
Despite the uncertainty surrounding incentives, Perchman praised the integrity of Uruguayan players. He said, “I think that in this case in Uruguayan football there have been a lot of cases of what the nobility of the teams are, who always go to the front, all teams.” He expressed confidence in Cerro Largo’s performance, stating, “I have no doubts… that Cerro Largo will make a very good game in Belvedere.”
How did Perchman react to Peñarol’s victory over Defensor Sporting?
Perchman expressed strong disapproval of Peñarol’s victory.He admitted, “I went to sleep with a recreooly,” conveying his disappointment and explaining that, internally, National views the league standings with two perspectives: one, the general view of all teams, and the other, a “hand in hand” view directly with Peñarol.
what specific criticisms did Perchman have about Defensor Sporting’s performance?
Perchman criticized Defensor Sporting’s performance, especially after Leo Coelho of Peñarol was sent off early in the match. He stated that Defensor Sporting “did not feel defender at any time.”
what was Perchman’s reaction to the goal scored by Leo Fernández?
Perchman questioned the marking on Leo Fernández’s goal, exclaiming, ”Crazy, it’s Leo!” He suggested a defensive lapse and stated, “There is a crucial technical error, the defenders instead of leaving them sank in the area.” He followed with, “Crazy, do not make the goal Leo Fernández.”
Did Perchman think Leo Fernández should have been expelled?
Yes, Perchman stated, “I think he had to have been expelled because he was not accidental, he looked for him,” referring to Fernández’s actions toward referee Matías de Armas.He speculated that fernández wasn’t expelled due to Coelho’s earlier dismissal.
Did Perchman make any other observations about Peñarol?
Yes, Perchman pointed out that “Peñarol has two or three players who are all the day protesting the plays. And one is Leo.” He concluded about Fernández, “The other day they forgave his life.”
Key Takeaways from Perchman’s Statements
Here’s a summary table of the key topics discussed and Perchman’s viewpoints:
| Topic | Perchman’s View |
|---|---|
| National’s Title Chances | Needs a victory and Liverpool to drop points. |
| Incentives | Cautious about the prospect of offering incentives; distinguishes between incentives to win and to lose. |
| Integrity of Uruguayan Players | Praised the integrity. |
| Peñarol’s Victory | Expressed strong disapproval. |
| Defensor Sporting’s Performance | criticized their performance. |
| Leo Fernández’s Goal | Questioned the marking and defensive errors. |
| Leo Fernández’s Actions | Believed Fernández should have been expelled. |