FY2026 NSRP Appropriations Bill Approved by House Committee
House FY26 NSRP Bill Proposes Significant Shifts in Global Health Funding
Table of Contents
The House of Representatives’ National Security Supplemental Appropriations bill for Fiscal year 2026 (FY26) signals a potential recalibration of U.S. global health funding, introducing new stipulations and strategic directives that could reshape how the nation supports international health initiatives. While the bill aims to maintain robust engagement, specific provisions highlight a focus on compliance with domestic policy and a push for greater country-lead ownership of programs.
Key Provisions and Funding Adjustments
The proposed legislation outlines several critical changes impacting global health programs, most notably within the Global Health Programs (GHP) account.
A significant progress is the proposed funding level for the GHP account, which stands at $3.75 billion. This represents a decrease from the FY25 enacted level of $4.05 billion, a reduction of $300 million. This adjustment is largely driven by a proposed decrease in funding for the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which is slated for a $200 million reduction.
Beyond the budgetary figures, the bill introduces crucial policy riders:
Compliance with Statutory Prohibitions: A key provision mandates that support for multilateral organizations thru the contributions to International organizations (CIO) account must strictly adhere to existing statutory prohibitions and requirements related to abortion. this underscores a commitment to aligning international funding with domestic policy stances.
Transition to Country-Led Efforts: The Secretary of State is required to submit a comprehensive strategy detailing transition plans for PEPFAR-supported programs. The goal is to foster greater country-led ownership and sustainability of these vital health initiatives.
Family Planning and Reproductive Health (FP/RH) and Global Health Security (GHS)
The report accompanying the House FY26 NSRP appropriations bill introduces a degree of ambiguity regarding specific funding allocations for Family Planning and Reproductive Health (FP/RH) and Global Health Security (GHS) within the GHP account. While the bill text states that “not more than $461,000,000 might potentially be made available for family planning/reproductive health,” it does not specify the account from which this funding would be drawn.
This leaves room for interpretation by the Management. If the full $461 million is allocated through the GHP account, it could signify a substantial decrease in funding for GHS, as the remaining funds within the GHP account after other program allocations are accounted for would be significantly reduced. Conversely, if the Administration directs this FP/RH funding through non-GHP accounts, it could possibly lead to an increase in GHS funding. The total remaining under the GHP account,after other specified areas are funded,is $864.71 million, which could be allocated to FP/RH, GHS, or other areas as determined by the Administration.
other Global Health Funding Areas
The bill also details proposed funding levels for other critical global health programs:
HIV/AIDS: $1.5 billion
Tuberculosis (TB): $300 million
Maternal and Child Health (MCH): $750 million
Nutrition: $200 million
Infectious diseases: $200 million
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH): $100 million
* Global Health Security (GHS): $100 million (This figure is based on the assumption that the remaining funds in the GHP account after other allocations are made available for GHS, but the final allocation remains subject to the Administration’s determination and the FP/RH funding strategy).
Multilateral Engagement and Specific Requirements
The proposed legislation also touches upon U.S. engagement with key multilateral organizations, introducing specific conditions for contributions.
Contributions to International Organizations (CIO)
As previously noted, contributions to multilateral organizations via the CIO account are subject to stringent compliance with statutory prohibitions and requirements concerning abortion. This is a critical directive that will shape how U.S. funds are channeled through international bodies.
Pan American Health Association (PAHO)
The report accompanying the House FY26 NSRP bill indicates that U.S.funding for the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) is contingent upon the organization meeting specific requirements detailed within the report. This suggests a more conditional