GOP Shifts on Trump Policy: Who’s Changing Sides?
House Republicans are pushing back against a Trump policy bill, creating hurdles for its passage. Key provisions regarding AI regulation and judicial contempt powers are drawing fire, with figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene opposing the AI moratorium. Rep. Mike Flood also objects to changes affecting judicial contempt. These shifts signal potential trouble for the bill’s future. This resistance could significantly alter the final version as it heads to the Senate. The primary_keyword here is “Trump policy bill,” and we are also spotlighting the secondary_keyword, “AI regulation”. With revisions expected and Senate scrutiny intensifying, the bill’s fate hangs in the balance. News Directory 3 is tracking the developments closely. Discover what’s next as the GOP navigates these internal conflicts.
Trump Policy Bill Faces Republican Opposition Over AI, Court Regulations
A sweeping policy bill championed by former president Donald Trump is facing unexpected resistance from House Republicans. Several GOP members have voiced concerns about specific provisions, potentially jeopardizing the bill’s future as it returns from Senate revisions.
Rep.Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., expressed strong disapproval of a provision that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. ”I am adamantly OPPOSED,” Greene posted on X, calling the measure “a violation of state rights.” She vowed to oppose the bill if the Senate dose not remove the AI moratorium.
Rep. Jay obernolte, R-Calif., a proponent of the AI provision, argues that a national framework is needed to avoid a confusing mix of state regulations that could hinder artificial intelligence advancement. The goal is to motivate Congress to adopt national artificial intelligence regulation.
Rep.Mike Flood, R-neb., also voiced reservations, stating he was unaware of a provision that would make it harder for federal judges to hold individuals in contempt of court. This measure would require judges to set bonds in civil suits seeking injunctions, covering potential costs if the order is overturned. Flood admitted, “This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill.”
Supporters claim the contempt provision aims to curb frivolous lawsuits,while critics argue it could shield Trump and his allies from accountability for violating court orders.
“I’m not going to hide the truth, this provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,” saeid Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb.
What’s next
Congress aims to finalize the “One Big Beatiful Bill Act” by July 4. However, significant Senate changes are anticipated, requiring another House vote. With several republican senators, including Rand Paul, R-Ky., and josh Hawley, R-Mo., already raising objections, the bill’s path to President Trump’s desk remains uncertain. Republicans can only afford to lose three votes,assuming unified Democratic opposition.