Greenfield Brothers Bribery: Jail Time Risk Exposes
- Here's a breakdown of the key data from the provided text, focusing on the offenses and details related to Darren and Michael Greenfield:
- * Fair work Act Offences: The maximum penalty for offenses under the Fair Work Act is 10 years' imprisonment, a fine exceeding $1 million, or both.
- * Public Dissatisfaction: A barrister representing the Greenfields suggests they have become "a lightning rod for people's general dissatisfaction or opinions in relation to the union movement." *...
Here’s a breakdown of the key data from the provided text, focusing on the offenses and details related to Darren and Michael Greenfield:
Key Offenses & Details:
* Fair work Act Offences: The maximum penalty for offenses under the Fair Work Act is 10 years’ imprisonment, a fine exceeding $1 million, or both.
* Darren Greenfield – Cash Payments: Between November 3,2018,and June 19,2020,Darren Greenfield (then state secretary of the CFMEU) received $20,000 in cash payments on four occasions. These payments were from a union member and co-offender (AF).
* Darren Greenfield – Site shutdown & Job influence: Darren Greenfield suggested to AF that he could “shut down building sites and influence the award of construction jobs.” This implies a potential abuse of power and corrupt practices.
* Michael Greenfield – False Statutory Declaration & Traffic Infringement: Michael Greenfield admitted to signing a false statutory declaration after running a red light.
* Michael Greenfield - covering Up Infringement: AF helped Michael Greenfield find a foreign worker to falsely take responsibility for the traffic infringement, motivated by avoiding demerit points.
* AF’s Role: AF appears to be a central figure, not only making payments to darren Greenfield but also assisting Michael Greenfield in covering up the traffic violation and later paying bribes to both men.
Context & Commentary:
* Public Dissatisfaction: A barrister representing the Greenfields suggests they have become “a lightning rod for people’s general dissatisfaction or opinions in relation to the union movement.”
* Distorting Effect: Even if Darren Greenfield’s offer to shut down sites and influence jobs was just “talk,” the prosecution argues it still has a “distorting effect on the relationship between the union and the industry.”
In essence, the text details allegations of corruption, abuse of power, and attempts to obstruct justice involving the two former CFMEU leaders.