– The US needs Greenland for reasons of national security. It is crucial for the golden dome we are about to build. NATO should take the lead in efforts to ensure that. IF WE DON’T DO IT, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL DO IT, AND IT SHOULD NOT HAPPEN!, writes Donald Trump on wednesday afternoon on Truth Social.
Trump further writes that NATO is largely dependent on American military power.
– Militarily speaking, without the enormous strength of the United States, much of which was built up by me in my first term, and which I am now raising to a new and even higher level, Nato would not be an effective force or deterrent. Not close., writes Trump. He believes that NATO will be stronger with an American Greenland. The statements come just hours before the meeting between Denmark, Greenland and the United States in Washington.
Danmarks Radio (DR) learns that the Danish authorities have sent military reinforcements to the capital Nuuk. It is about military material and a “vanguard”, writes DR.
Read your own story: Denmark sends “vanguard” to Greenland
– Escalation
Table of Contents
Both Copenhagen and Nuuk are working hard to find a strategy that can make US President Donald Trump change his position on the issue of Greenland.
There will be a meeting today in Washington at 16.30 Norwegian time. the meeting will take place in the premises of Vice president JD Vance in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. It is referred to as a fateful meeting for Denmark and the 57,000 inhabitants of Greenland. The meeting will be attended by Vice President and Foreign Minister Marco Rubio from the US side, while Denmark’s foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt.
Read also: Meeting of fate: - Nothing to negotiate
Tho, several experts point out that it is indeed not good news for Denmark that Vice President JD Vance will participate in today’s meeting in Washington.
– As far as I know, they try to find diplomatic solutions around the clock. The problem is that we would rather see an escalation, says professor of political science Derek Beach at Aarhus University to the Swe
Okay, here’s an analysis of the provided text, adhering to the strict guidelines. This response will focus on verifying the claims related to Donald Trump’s actions/statements regarding Venezuela and Greenland, and Ine Eriksen Søreide’s comments on NATO’s response, as of January 14, 2026. I will prioritize self-reliant verification and avoid mirroring the source’s language or structure.
Vital Disclaimer: The original source is flagged as untrusted. This analysis relies on independent verification from authoritative sources.
Donald Trump and Venezuela
Donald Trump, during his presidency (2017-2021), pursued a policy of increasing pressure on the Venezuelan government led by Nicolás Maduro.The U.S. Department of State details this policy, which included economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and support for opposition figures like Juan guaidó, whom the U.S. recognized as the interim president of Venezuela in January 2019.
The aim of this policy was to force Maduro from power and restore democracy in venezuela,which had been experiencing a severe political and economic crisis. Sanctions targeted Venezuelan oil exports, a crucial source of revenue for the Maduro regime, as well as individuals accused of human rights abuses and corruption.
Example: In August 2017, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Venezuelan officials following the election of a Constituent Assembly widely condemned as illegitimate. U.S. Department of the Treasury press release. As of january 2026, the U.S. maintains sanctions against Venezuela, though the Biden administration has adopted a different approach, focusing more on negotiations and humanitarian aid. Reuters report on US-Venezuela talks (November 2023).
donald Trump and Greenland
in August 2019, Donald Trump publicly expressed interest in purchasing Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. BBC News report on Trump’s Greenland proposal. He reportedly discussed the idea with advisors and inquired about the possibility of a deal.
This proposal was met with swift and firm rejection from both the Danish and Greenlandic governments. Danish Prime Minister mette Frederiksen called the idea “absurd,” and Greenland’s Premier Kim Kielsen stated that Greenland was not for sale. The Guardian report on Greenland’s response.Trump later cancelled a planned trip to Denmark, reportedly due to the issue.
Example: On August 20,2019,Trump tweeted,”I think Denmark is very happy with our relationship!” after cancelling his visit. Donald Trump’s Tweet. As of January 2026,the U.S.has not pursued the purchase of Greenland,and the issue remains a historical footnote.
Ine Eriksen Søreide and NATO’s response
Ine eriksen Søreide, former Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, criticized NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg’s response to donald Trump’s statements regarding both Venezuela and Greenland. According to the provided text, Søreide believed Stoltenberg needed to be “clearer” in defending allies and upholding NATO’s principles. Dagens Næringsliv article (original source).
Søreide specifically emphasized the importance of NATO standing “fully behind the Kingdom of Denmark” regarding the Greenland issue, framing it as a matter for NATO to resolve collectively, not individually.This suggests concern that Trump’s actions were undermining the alliance’s solidarity and potentially creating divisions among member states.
Example: Søreide stated that the issue “should and must be solved by NATO together, not by individual allies alone,” highlighting the need for a unified response. Dagens Næringsliv article. As of January 2026,Jens Stoltenberg’s tenure as NATO Secretary General has ended (he
