H5N1 in Raw Milk Cheese: Months-Long Risk
Bird Flu virus Persists in Raw Milk Cheese: A Public Health Risk?
Table of Contents
- Bird Flu virus Persists in Raw Milk Cheese: A Public Health Risk?
- Bird Flu in Raw Milk Cheese: Your Questions Answered
- What is the primary concern regarding bird flu and raw milk cheese?
- Can humans get bird flu from eating raw milk cheese?
- What did the Cornell University study on raw milk cheese reveal?
- How was the study performed?
- What dose “pH” have to do with bird flu inactivation?
- Which strains of bird flu viruses have been found in cattle?
- Has the FDA tested cheese for bird flu?
- Is pasteurization effective against bird flu?
- What should I do to protect myself from bird flu in dairy products?
- Why is it critically important to consume pasteurized milk?
- What are the symptoms of bird flu in humans?
- Table Summary: Bird Flu in Raw Milk Cheese – Key Facts
A recent study by Cornell University, wiht funding from the US food and Drug Administration, reveals that raw cheese produced from milk of bird flu-infected dairy cattle can harbor infectious virus for extended periods, potentially posing a risk to public health.
Raw Milk Cheese and H5N1 Virus
Raw milk cheeses are crafted without pasteurization, a process that typically eliminates harmful pathogens. This new research raises concerns about the stability of the H5N1 virus in these products.
In an interview, Kennedy stated, “The disease is not passed through food, so you cannot get it – as far as we know, you cannot get it from an egg or milk or meat from an infected animal.” However, this statement is only partly accurate.
While there have been no confirmed reports of people contracting bird flu from contaminated foods like raw milk cheese, it’s known that cats and other animals have been infected via raw cow’s milk and raw pet food. Furthermore, there have been at least three confirmed human infections where the source of exposure to the H5N1 virus remained undetermined.
Dairy workers have been infected by getting splashed with raw milk in their faces or eyes.
According to Diel, it’s “still not entirely clear whether humans can be infected by eating or drinking contaminated food,” emphasizing that his study wasn’t specifically designed to address this question.
However, Diel added, “I do think it is possible. There is a risk of infection… It obviously depends on the dose, how much of that contaminated product is ingested.”
The risk may also vary depending on the specific viral strain present in the milk or cheese. The study examined the B3.13 virus, which initially infected US cattle in March 2024 and caused mild illness in humans. A newer strain, D1.1, linked to more severe human cases, has also been found in cattle, further elevating the potential risk.
Study Methodology and Findings
The researchers created mini cheeses using milk spiked with the H5N1 virus,testing three pH levels: 6.6, 5.8, and 5.0 (the most acidic). They then assessed the cheeses over time to determine if any infectious virus remained, using injections into fertilized chicken eggs as the “gold standard” test.
The study revealed that “levels of the virus remained high for the first seven days” and then decreased slightly in cheeses with pH levels of 6.6 and 5.8. Importantly, “the virus remained infectious for the full two-month aging period,” demonstrating its remarkable stability.
These findings were corroborated by real-world samples of raw milk cheese from a farm with bird flu-infected cows. These samples also showed high virus levels and sustained infectiousness over two months.
“Our study demonstrates that HPAI H5N1 virus exhibits remarkable stability throughout the cheese making process,” the authors wrote in their preprint study.
However, the study indicated that increasing the acidity of raw milk cheese might neutralize the virus. No live virus was detected in cheese produced at pH 5.0. Previous research has also confirmed that standard pasteurization methods effectively inactivate the virus.
Expert Opinions and FDA Response
Experts concur that the study aligns with existing knowledge about the virus’s stability in milk.
Dr. Seema Lakdawala, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at Emory University, stated, “We have also observed that milk can change the pH needed to inactivate the virus.”
Lakdawala added, “we and others have repeatedly observed that milk will prevent the degradation of the virus on surfaces, and it increases the pH stability, such that a much lower pH than normal is needed to inactivate the virus.”
The FDA has acknowledged the study’s findings and shared preliminary results from its ongoing raw cheese sampling study.
The FDA sampling study, initiated in December, has analyzed 110 cheese samples from stores nationwide. To date, 96 samples tested negative via PCR (polymerase chain reaction), suggesting they were likely made with uncontaminated milk. Results for the remaining 14 samples are pending.
The statement said, “the FDA is continuing to work with Federal and state partners to address the ongoing outbreak of HPAI A (H5N1) in dairy cattle. The FDA has sampled a total of 464 pasteurized dairy products, including milk cheese butter and ice cream, all were negative for viable H5N1. In addition, multiple research studies have confirmed that pasteurization inactivates the virus.”
Conclusion: Vigilance and Safe Practices
experts emphasize the importance of ongoing surveillance and avoiding raw milk products.
“This is another reason we should push to ensure there is no bird flu in milk products and only consume pasteurized dairy products,” Lakdawala concluded.
Bird Flu in Raw Milk Cheese: Your Questions Answered
Bird flu (H5N1) in dairy cattle and its potential presence in raw milk products has become a growing concern. This Q&A provides clear, concise answers about the risks, research findings, and what you should know to protect yourself.
What is the primary concern regarding bird flu and raw milk cheese?
The main worry is that raw milk cheese made from milk from bird flu-infected cows can harbor infectious H5N1 virus for an extended period. As raw milk cheese isn’t pasteurized (a process that kills harmful pathogens), the virus can persist, potentially posing a public health risk.
Can humans get bird flu from eating raw milk cheese?
While there are currently no confirmed reports of humans contracting bird flu directly from raw milk cheese, it’s not impossible. Studies have shown that cats and other animals have been infected through raw milk. Additionally, there have been unexplained human H5N1 infections.
Key takeaway: It’s still unclear exactly how likely human infection is from contaminated food, but experts suggest it’s a possibility, especially depending on the viral load in the product and the amount consumed.
What did the Cornell University study on raw milk cheese reveal?
The Cornell University study, funded by the FDA, found that:
H5N1 virus remained infectious in raw milk cheese for up to two months, the entire duration of the study.
The virus’s stability was high, even during cheesemaking.
Increasing the acidity (lowering the pH) of the cheese to pH 5.0 neutralized the virus.
How was the study performed?
The study simulated cheese-making by:
Spiking milk with the H5N1 virus.
Creating “mini cheeses” at three different pH levels (6.6, 5.8, and 5.0).
Testing the cheeses over time to see if the virus remained infectious.
Using injections into fertilized chicken eggs as the “gold standard” test for infectious virus.
Corroborating these findings with real-world samples of raw milk cheese from a farm with bird flu-infected cows.
What dose “pH” have to do with bird flu inactivation?
pH measures acidity. A lower pH indicates higher acidity. The study found that when raw milk cheese was produced at a pH of 5.0 (more acidic), the H5N1 virus was no longer detectable. This suggests that increasing acidity can neutralize the virus in raw milk cheese.
Which strains of bird flu viruses have been found in cattle?
The study initially focused on the B3.13 strain,which caused mild illness in humans. However, a more recent and concerning strain, D1.1, which has been linked to more severe human cases, has also been found in cattle. This elevates the potential risk associated with consuming contaminated raw milk products.
Has the FDA tested cheese for bird flu?
Yes. The FDA has an ongoing raw cheese sampling study, initiated in December.As of now:
They’ve analyzed 110 cheese samples from stores nationwide.
96 samples tested negative for H5N1 via PCR, likely indicating they were made with uncontaminated milk.
Results for the remaining 14 samples are pending.
Vital: The FDA has also tested 464 pasteurized dairy products (milk, cheese, butter, ice cream), and all were negative for viable H5N1. This reinforces the effectiveness of pasteurization in eliminating the virus.
Is pasteurization effective against bird flu?
Yes. Multiple research studies have confirmed that standard pasteurization methods effectively inactivate the H5N1 virus in milk. the FDA’s testing of pasteurized dairy products further supports this.
What should I do to protect myself from bird flu in dairy products?
Experts recommend:
Consuming only pasteurized dairy products. Pasteurization is a reliable method for eliminating the virus.
Staying informed: Keep up-to-date with the latest information from reputable sources like the CDC and FDA.
Why is it critically important to consume pasteurized milk?
Pasteurization heats milk to a specific temperature for a set time, killing harmful bacteria and viruses, including bird flu. This process ensures that milk and dairy products are safe for consumption.
What are the symptoms of bird flu in humans?
According to the CDC, symptoms of bird flu infections in humans can vary, ranging from mild to severe. They may include:
Fever
Cough
Sore throat
Muscle aches
Eye infections (conjunctivitis)
Pneumonia
Acute respiratory distress
Other severe and life-threatening complications
If you experience these symptoms, especially after contact with potentially infected animals or raw milk, seek medical attention immediately.
Table Summary: Bird Flu in Raw Milk Cheese – Key Facts
| Fact | Detail |
| —————————————– | ———————————————————————————————————————————– |
| Main Concern | H5N1 virus can persist in raw milk cheese for extended periods, posing a risk. |
| Human Infection | No confirmed cases from cheese, but animal infections and unexplained human cases raise concerns. |
| Cornell Study | Virus remained infectious for 2 months; acidity (pH 5.0) neutralized it. |
| FDA Testing | Raw cheese testing ongoing; all* pasteurized dairy product tests negative for viable H5N1. |
| Pasteurization | Confirmed to inactivate the H5N1 virus. |
| Proposal | Consume only pasteurized dairy products. |
| Strains of Concern | B3.13 (initially); D1.1 (linked to more severe human cases). |
| Symptoms in Humans | Fever, cough, sore throat, muscle aches, eye infections, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress, and other severe complications. |
