How Kalshi and prediction markets are disrupting sports betting
kalshi’s Sports Betting Fight: Regulators vs. Prediction Markets
A clash is brewing between gambling regulators and Kalshi, a financial exchange, over the offering of sports-related markets. Despite cease-and-desist orders from multiple states, Kalshi continues too operate nationwide, asserting it is indeed not engaged in sports betting. The outcome of this dispute could significantly alter the landscape of American sports betting.
The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control commission, among others, views Kalshi’s contracts as indistinguishable from sports wagers, requiring a state license. This stance contrasts with Kalshi’s position, which considers itself under federal jurisdiction. Donald Trump Jr. serves as a strategic adviser for the company.
Kalshi has challenged state regulators in court, arguing it functions as a financial exchange, not a sportsbook. So far, it has won cases in Nevada and New Jersey, key legal betting markets, allowing it to continue offering sports contracts while litigation proceeds.
Johnny P. ElHachem,a gaming law expert at Holland & Knight,noted that a kalshi victory could lead to broader use of sports-based event contracts outside conventional sportsbook regulation. He raised concerns about market governance and policing.
Tarek Mansour,Kalshi’s CEO,has questioned the connection between his product and gambling,suggesting it’s akin to the broader financial market. Kalshi emphasizes that users trade contracts with each other,unlike traditional sportsbooks where bettors wager against the house. The company profits from transaction fees, similar to a broker.
Sara Slane, head of corporate progress at Kalshi, said the company operates as an exchange, connecting those buying “yes” and “no” contracts.Kalshi’s fees are often lower than sportsbook vigs, attracting sophisticated clients.
Licensed sportsbooks operate in most states, typically with a minimum age of 21. Kalshi, regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), is available in all 50 states to those 18 and older, including states without legalized sports betting. Dustin Gouker, a gambling consultant, asserts that despite legal arguments, Kalshi is fundamentally gambling.
Kalshi underwent a six-year certification process with the CFTC, allowing it to introduce new offerings without prior federal approval. Though, a CFTC rule prohibits event contracts related to “gaming.”
Despite earlier arguments that “gaming” applied to sports, Kalshi began offering sports contracts, including on major events like the Super Bowl. A company spokesperson reported over $1 billion traded on 3.4 million sports propositions in five months, with roughly two million users nationwide.

The CFTC has yet to formally weigh in on the matter. Brian Quintenz, President Trump’s nominee to lead the commission, is on Kalshi’s board and owns stock. He has pledged to resign and divest if confirmed. The NBA, NFL, and MLB have expressed concerns to the CFTC about game integrity in this emerging market.
Jonathan D. Nabavi, NFL’s VP, highlighted the lack of regulatory safeguards compared to legalized sports betting. the NBA voiced concerns about potential expansion into individual player propositions and the unchecked self-certification process.
Alexandra Roth, NBA’s VP, noted the absence of requirements for exchanges like Kalshi to report suspicious trades or cooperate with league investigations.
Slane said Kalshi is communicating with leagues to address their concerns. The company has partnered with IC360, an integrity monitor, and implemented consumer protection measures.
Other companies, including ProphetX, Crypto.com, and Robinhood, are also exploring sports prediction markets. Sporttrade has requested CFTC permission to expand nationwide.
DraftKings and FanDuel have considered launching their own prediction markets. Peter Jackson, CEO of Flutter, FanDuel’s parent company, expressed interest in the opportunity. gouker believes sportsbooks are wary of upsetting state regulators.
Rufus Peabody, a professional bettor, views prediction markets as a positive addition, catering to price-sensitive bettors. While prediction markets haven’t significantly impacted sportsbook action, the industry is closely monitoring developments.
ElHachem concludes that the resolution of this issue will define the boundary between financial speculation and regulated betting, reshaping the sports wagering ecosystem.
