Ilie Bolojan: State Company Salary Increases – 50%
This text excerpt reveals a strong critique from the Prime Minister (Bolognese) regarding the salaries and practices within state-owned companies in Romania. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
* excessive Salaries & Lack of Performance Link: The Prime minister believes the salaries of directors in these companies are disproportionately high and not tied to their performance. He uses the phrase “spinsters” (likely meaning they don’t work hard) to contrast them with people working diligently in both the public and private sectors.
* Monopoly Profits & Abuse of Provisions: he suggests these companies benefit from a monopoly-like position, allowing them to generate income easily, regardless of performance. He also accuses them of exploiting past legal loopholes.
* Resistance to Salary Caps: The Prime minister claims these companies are deliberately pushing salary limits, not as they fear public scrutiny of the data (they don’t mind it being public), but because they want to avoid having their budgets restricted. They are resisting a return to “decent allowance values.”
* Call for Intervention: He believes that if legal means (laws) fail to control the situation, common sense, pressure from the ministry, or other forces should be used to address the issue, as these companies are “defying people.”
* Related Case: The linked article details acquittals in a case involving state funding for Romanian films, where a director from the CNC (National Center of Cinematography) was cleared of charges related to 46 million lei in damages. This likely fuels the Prime Minister’s concerns about mismanagement and lack of accountability.
* Government Request for Salary Restraint: the government (led by Bolojan) previously requested that heads of state companies earn less than the President, nicușor Dan.
In essence, the Prime Minister is expressing frustration with what he sees as a system of overpaid, underperforming directors in state-owned companies who are actively resisting efforts to curb their compensation. He implies a lack of accountability and a willingness to exploit loopholes for personal gain.