Illinois Basketball’s Uncertain Future: Stojaković’s Next Move vs. Brad Underwood’s Backup Plan

The Illinois basketball program is currently navigating a period of uncertainty regarding the future of Andrej Stojakovic, who is weighing his options between returning to the Fighting Illini or entering the NBA Draft. As of May 27, 2026, the program has not received a definitive commitment from the wing player, forcing head coach Brad Underwood to develop a contingency strategy to maintain the team’s competitive standing.

Stojakovic has served as a primary offensive catalyst for Illinois, providing essential floor spacing and perimeter scoring. His potential departure would create a significant void in the roster, particularly in the team’s ability to stretch opposing defenses and provide a reliable scoring option from the wing.

Strategic Contingencies for the Roster

Coach Brad Underwood is reportedly preparing a Plan B to ensure the roster remains balanced regardless of Stojakovic’s decision. This approach is designed to mitigate the loss of a high-impact player by identifying alternative ways to generate scoring and versatility on the perimeter.

The primary components of this contingency plan involve three main avenues of roster management:

• Utilization of the transfer portal to secure an experienced collegiate wing who can provide immediate production.
• Accelerating the development of current underclassmen to fill the scoring gap.
• Aggressive pursuit of high-school recruits who fit the specific athletic and skill profile of a modern NBA-style wing.

Underwood has historically leaned on the transfer portal to address immediate needs, often targeting players with proven production in other conferences. If Stojakovic opts for the NBA, the portal remains the most viable path for Illinois to acquire a veteran presence before the start of the next season.

Impact on Team Dynamics and Playstyle

The presence of Stojakovic has allowed Illinois to implement a more open offensive system, creating more room for interior players to operate. Without his gravity as a shooter, the Fighting Illini may be forced to adjust their offensive sets or rely more heavily on isolation plays and drive-and-kick sequences.

The loss of such a player would also impact the team’s defensive versatility. Stojakovic’s length has been a key asset in Underwood’s defensive schemes, allowing the team to switch more effectively on the perimeter and disrupt passing lanes.

Big Ten Context and Competition

This decision comes at a critical time for the Big Ten conference, which has seen an increase in the early departure of star players to the professional ranks. Illinois is competing against other top-tier programs that are similarly utilizing the transfer portal to build “super-teams” of experienced collegiate players.

Maintaining a high ceiling for the 2026-27 season depends heavily on how Underwood manages this transition. The program’s ability to replace Stojakovic’s production will determine if the Fighting Illini remain primary contenders for the conference title and a deep run in the NCAA Tournament.

While the program awaits a final decision, the focus remains on maintaining the current team chemistry while simultaneously scouting potential replacements. The timeline for NBA Draft decisions typically concludes in the early summer, meaning the program will have clarity on its roster construction shortly.