Immediate Attitude: Complaint Against Roland Meister
Table of Contents
GELSENKIRCHEN, Germany – Roland Meister, a lawyer with 40 years of experience defending politically persecuted individuals, faces a complaint filed by the city of gladbeck after challenging their handling of an immigration case. The complaint, lodged with the Hamm Bar Association on Feb.21,2025,alleges professional misconduct,which Meister calls baseless and retaliatory.
Dispute Stemmed From Expulsion order
The conflict originated with a lawsuit Meister filed against an expulsion order on behalf of a client facing deportation. According to court documents, on June 27, 2024, authorities planned to forcibly remove his client from custody at the Turkish Consulate General in Hürth.
Meister obtained an injunction (Az.: 11 L 974/24) from the Gelsenkirchen administrative court, prohibiting the use of coercive measures. Though, Meister claims the central immigration authority of Coesfeld and the city of Gladbeck disregarded the court order. His client was allegedly transported to the consulate in handcuffs and ankle restraints.
Lawsuit Alleges Disregard for court Order
Citing the alleged disregard for the court’s decision and the “illegal bondage” of his client, Meister filed a “continuation declaratory action” (file number: 11 K 2917/24) with the Gelsenkirchen administrative court. In the July 4, 2024, complaint, Meister stated, “In view of German experiences with fascist arbitrariness, it cannot be accepted that a German mayor and her authority ignore court resolutions.”
City Files Complaint Against lawyer
Instead of acknowledging any wrongdoing, the legal office of the city of Gladbeck filed a complaint against Meister with the Hamm Bar Association. The complaint reportedly criticizes Meister’s reference to “German experiences with fascist arbitrariness” in his service complaint. Meister maintains this reference was justified, given the immigration authorities’ actions.
Meister also suggests the complaint contains information that could only have been obtained by overhearing a confidential client discussion. The accusations remain under review by the Hamm Bar Association.
This article explores the accusations against Gladbeck authorities in Germany involving alleged retaliation against human rights lawyer Roland Meister. We’ll delve into Meister’s case, examining the key events and legal arguments.
What is the Situation?
Q: Who is Roland Meister, and what is he accused of?
A: Roland Meister is a lawyer with 40 years of experience defending politically persecuted individuals. He is facing a complaint filed by the city of Gladbeck, Germany, alleging professional misconduct. Meister considers thes allegations baseless and retaliatory.
What Triggered the Complaint?
Q: What prompted the city of Gladbeck too file a complaint against Roland Meister?
A: The complaint stems from Meister’s challenge to Gladbeck’s handling of an immigration case. He had filed a lawsuit concerning an expulsion order against one of his clients.
Q: What was the core issue that led to the dispute?
A: The dispute centered on an expulsion order and allegations that Gladbeck authorities disregarded a court order related to Meister’s client, who was facing deportation.
Q: What happened with the expulsion order that Meister challenged?
A: Meister filed a lawsuit against an expulsion order on behalf of his client. The authorities planned to forcibly remove his client from custody at the Turkish Consulate general in Hürth on June 27, 2024, according to court documents.
The Court’s Role
Q: What legal action did Roland Meister take on behalf of his client?
A: Meister obtained an injunction (Az.: 11 L 974/24) from the Gelsenkirchen administrative court. this injunction prohibited the use of coercive measures against his client.
Q: What was Meister’s claim regarding the court order?
A: He claims that the Gladbeck authorities disregarded the court order and that his client was transported to the consulate in handcuffs and ankle restraints.
Q: Did Meister file any further legal actions?
A: Yes, Meister filed a “continuation declaratory action” (file number: 11 K 2917/24) with the Gelsenkirchen administrative court, citing the alleged disregard for the court’s decision and the “illegal bondage” of his client.
The City’s Response and Accusations
Q: what was the city of Gladbeck’s response to Meister’s actions?
A: Rather of acknowledging any wrongdoing, the legal office of the city of Gladbeck lodged a complaint against Meister with the hamm bar Association.
Q: What specific criticisms did the city of Gladbeck level against Meister?
A: The city’s complaint reportedly criticizes Meister’s reference to “German experiences with fascist arbitrariness” in his service complaint.
Q: What is Meister’s defense against the city’s complaint?
A: Meister maintains that his reference to “German experiences with fascist arbitrariness” was justified, given the immigration authorities’ actions in the case. He also suggests details in the complaint could only have come from a breach of client confidentiality.
Key Timelines
Q: Can we summarize the key dates in this case?
A:
| Event | Date |
| —————————————————————- | ————- |
| Complaint filed against Meister | Feb. 21, 2025 |
| Authorities attempt removal of Meister’s client | June 27, 2024 |
| Meister obtained an injunction from the Gelsenkirchen court. | 2024 |
| Meister filed “continuation declaratory action” | July 4, 2024 |
The Hamm Bar Association
Q: What is the role of the Hamm Bar association in this case?
A: The Hamm Bar Association is currently reviewing the allegations and complaints filed against Meister.
Looking Ahead
Q: What happens next in this case?
A: The accusations against meister are under review by the Hamm Bar Association, and the outcome of their findings will determine the next steps of the process.