In a match of jealousy, the husband killed his spouse after which jumped off the constructing to commit suicide.

Ho Chi Minh Metropolis Folks’s Court docket at this time (August 21) sentenced defendant Nguyen Gia Tuan (38 years outdated, residing in District 12, Ho Chi Minh Metropolis) to life in jail for the crime of “Homicide”.

Based on the prosecution, Tuan and his spouse, Ms. TTTH, bought married in 2013 and had two youngsters collectively. In early 2023, suspecting Ms. H. of getting an affair, Tuan usually quarreled together with his spouse.

On April 24, 2023, additionally out of jealousy, Tuan and his spouse argued and fought once more. In a match of anger, Tuan took a knife and stabbed his spouse repeatedly within the left chest. Making an attempt to combat again however unable to flee, Ms. H. ran out onto the balcony and collapsed and died.

Seeing his spouse lifeless, Tuan snatched the digital camera put in in the home and threw it within the trash to destroy the proof, then ran to the balcony and jumped to the bottom to commit suicide.

Right now, Mr. Vo Sy D. – a technical employees of the condo constructing – heard a loud noise so he went to examine and noticed Tuan mendacity on the storage ground with many accidents, so he referred to as an ambulance.

After that, Mr. D. and the safety guard ran as much as Tuan’s condo, however the door was locked from the within. Wanting by means of the crack within the door, they noticed many blood stains on the ground, furnishings was in disarray, and Ms. H. was mendacity on the balcony.

Based on the conclusion of the Legal Strategies Division of Ho Chi Minh Metropolis Police, the reason for Ms. H’s dying was attributable to irreversible blood loss shock, a number of puncture wounds to the guts and left lung.

On the trial, the defendant confessed to the crime as charged.

Expressing his opinion on the case, the consultant of the Folks’s Procuracy stated that the defendant’s habits was hooliganism and aggression, and wanted to be completely eradicated from social life, so he proposed that the panel of judges sentence the defendant to dying.

Nevertheless, Tuan’s household introduced the defendant’s well being document to the panel of judges. Based on the medical examination outcomes, Tuan was decided to have indicators of melancholy.

After deliberation, the panel of judges discovered that the defendant had taken the lifetime of one other particular person out of jealousy. Nevertheless, the defendant had confessed truthfully, had a great character, and the sufferer’s household requested for a diminished sentence, so the defendant was sentenced to the above sentence.