Los Angeles – The head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, testified on Wednesday that he does not believe users can become “clinically addicted” to the social media platform, as a landmark trial examining the potential harms of social media on young people continues in California. The case centers on allegations that Instagram, along with other platforms, knowingly designed features to be addictive, contributing to mental health issues in its users.
Mosseri, testifying in Los Angeles Superior Court, emphasized the importance of differentiating between “clinical addiction” and “problematic use.” He stated that while individuals can certainly spend excessive time on Instagram to their own detriment, this does not necessarily equate to a clinically recognized addiction. He drew a parallel to binge-watching television, noting that enjoying a show for an extended period doesn’t constitute a clinical dependency.
“I’m sure I said this, but I think it’s important to differentiate between clinical addiction and problematic use,” Mosseri said, according to reports. He further clarified that he is not a medical professional and was being cautious with his terminology, acknowledging that someone close to him has experienced serious clinical addiction.
The lawsuit was brought by a 20-year-old woman, identified only as KGM, who alleges that her mental health suffered as a result of prolonged use of social media platforms, including Instagram. She claims the platforms intentionally developed addictive features to hook young users. This case is considered a “bellwether trial,” meaning its outcome could influence the handling of over 1,500 similar lawsuits against social media companies.
While acknowledging that users may spend more time on Instagram than they “feel good about,” Mosseri maintained that the company does not intentionally design its platform to be addictive. He stated that it is not beneficial to the company if users feel negatively about their experience. He also addressed concerns about features like beauty filters, which have been accused of promoting unrealistic beauty standards and contributing to body image issues. Mosseri explained that there is a constant balancing act between safety and freedom of expression, and that Instagram strives to be as safe as possible while minimizing censorship.
The trial is taking place against a backdrop of growing concern about the impact of social media on young people’s mental health. The case raises fundamental questions about the responsibility of social media companies to protect their users, particularly minors, from potential harm. The outcome could have significant implications for the future regulation of social media platforms and the way they are designed.
Mark Lanier, the lawyer representing the plaintiff, questioned Mosseri about whether Instagram prioritizes profits over the well-being of young users and whether the app is designed to be intentionally addictive. Lanier is known for his successful litigation against Johnson & Johnson over allegations that its baby powder caused cancer, and his involvement in this case has drawn considerable attention.
The trial is expected to continue with testimony from other key figures in the tech industry. Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg is scheduled to testify on February 18th, and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan is also expected to appear at a later date. The proceedings are being closely watched by legal experts, policymakers, and parents concerned about the effects of social media on children and adolescents.
The case highlights the complex challenges of regulating social media platforms and balancing the benefits of connectivity with the potential risks to mental health. As social media continues to play an increasingly prominent role in the lives of young people, the debate over its impact and the responsibility of tech companies is likely to intensify.
