International Condemnation Mounts Against Polisario Following Es-Smara Attack
- The Polisario Front's projectile attack on the city of Smara on May 5, 2026, has triggered a wave of international condemnation from several governments and international organizations, with...
- The assault involved the use of three projectiles targeting the city of Smara.
- The circle of condemnation expanded as the United Kingdom, Belgium, the United Arab Emirates, and the Czech Republic also denounced the assault.
The Polisario Front’s projectile attack on the city of Smara on May 5, 2026, has triggered a wave of international condemnation from several governments and international organizations, with diplomats warning that the escalation threatens regional stability and the United Nations-led political process.
The assault involved the use of three projectiles targeting the city of Smara. Following the attack, the United States, France and the European Union voiced their disapproval of the action.
The circle of condemnation expanded as the United Kingdom, Belgium, the United Arab Emirates, and the Czech Republic also denounced the assault.
Diplomatic Responses
The United Kingdom, acting through its embassy in Rabat, expressed opposition to the May 5 attacks. In a statement issued on May 8, 2026, the UK warned that the actions «risk undermining efforts towards peace.»

The UK reiterated its support for initiatives led by the United States and the United Nations to resolve the Western Sahara conflict. This support was framed in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 2797, and the UK urged all involved parties to engage with a spirit of compromise to achieve a lasting resolution.
Belgium also condemned the attack on Smara. Belgian officials called for the respect of the ceasefire as We see stipulated in UN Security Council Resolution 2797 (2025).
Polisario Reaction and Political Context
Brahim Ghali, the leader of the Polisario Front, denounced the international condemnation of the May 5 attack.
The escalation has led to warnings that the renewed hostilities could jeopardize the ongoing political process directed by the United Nations. Several of the condemning nations emphasized the necessity of pursuing political negotiations, specifically citing the autonomy proposal as the foundation for reaching a final and lasting solution to the conflict.
