Baghdad, – The Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong condemnation of remarks attributed to the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, suggesting potential Israeli control over the entirety of the Middle East. The statement underscores growing regional anxieties regarding the geopolitical implications of U.S. Policy and the evolving dynamics between Israel and its neighbors.
The Ministry’s statement, released via official channels and reported by multiple news outlets including Shafaq News and Petra, characterized the Ambassador’s comments as a “serious transgression” inconsistent with international law and the United Nations Charter. It further asserted that such statements infringe upon the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of states within the region, and carry “negative implications for the security and stability” of the Middle East.
The controversy stems from an interview with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, where Ambassador Huckabee, described as a Christian Zionist and close ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, reportedly responded to questions about biblical borders extending from the Euphrates River in Iraq to the Nile River in Egypt. According to reporting by the Associated Press, Huckabee stated, “It would be fine if they took it all.” He later qualified the remark as “somewhat of a hyperbolic statement,” suggesting Israel was not actively seeking regional expansion but leaving open the possibility under certain circumstances, specifically in the event of war.
Iraq’s response highlights a deepening concern among Arab nations regarding perceived shifts in U.S. Foreign policy. The ambiguity surrounding the Ambassador’s comments, even when framed as hyperbole, has fueled anxieties about potential U.S. Support for expansive Israeli territorial claims. This is particularly sensitive given the ongoing geopolitical instability in the region and the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs explicitly affirmed its “steadfast position in support of the sovereignty of States” and its rejection of “any policies or practices based on domination or the imposition of a fait accompli.” This stance reflects a broader regional commitment to upholding established international boundaries and resisting unilateral actions that could destabilize the region. The Ministry also stressed the importance of adhering to international law to “consolidate regional peace and security.”
The condemnation from Iraq is not isolated. Reports indicate that other Arab and Muslim countries have also expressed sharp criticism of Ambassador Huckabee’s remarks, as reported by Anadolu Agency and the Associated Press. This widespread disapproval underscores the sensitivity of the issue and the potential for further diplomatic fallout.
The timing of these comments is particularly noteworthy. The region remains fragile, with ongoing conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere. The potential for escalation is ever-present, and any perceived endorsement of expansive territorial claims could exacerbate existing tensions. The statement from Iraq serves as a clear signal that such rhetoric is unacceptable and could undermine efforts to promote regional stability.
While Ambassador Huckabee characterized his initial statement as hyperbolic, the damage may already be done. The perception of U.S. Acquiescence to potentially aggressive Israeli policies could embolden hardliners on both sides of the conflict and complicate ongoing diplomatic efforts. The Iraqi government’s firm response is likely intended to send a strong message to Washington and Jerusalem, reaffirming its commitment to regional sovereignty and stability.
The economic implications of heightened regional instability are significant. The Middle East is a crucial energy producer, and any disruption to oil supplies could have a ripple effect on global markets. Increased geopolitical risk also discourages foreign investment and hinders economic development. The Iraqi government, which is working to rebuild its economy after years of conflict, has a vested interest in maintaining regional stability.
Looking ahead, the situation warrants close monitoring. The U.S. State Department has not yet issued a formal response to the criticisms leveled against Ambassador Huckabee. However, it is likely that Washington will seek to clarify its position and reassure regional partners that it remains committed to a peaceful and stable Middle East. The coming days and weeks will be critical in determining whether this diplomatic incident can be contained or whether it will further escalate regional tensions.
The Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ statement serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance of power in the Middle East and the importance of diplomatic restraint. The region’s future hinges on the ability of all parties to respect international law, uphold the sovereignty of states, and prioritize peaceful resolutions to conflict.
