Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Judge Rejects Nadiem Makarim Pretrial Lawsuit – Key Considerations

Judge Rejects Nadiem Makarim Pretrial Lawsuit – Key Considerations

October 13, 2025 Robert Mitchell - News Editor of Newsdirectory3.com News

“`html





Court Rejects <a href="https://www.newsdirectory3.com/free-meals-program-promotes-positive-values-in-students/" title="Free Meals Program Promotes Positive Values in Students">Nadiem Makarim</a>‘s pretrial Motion


Court ‌Rejects Nadiem Makarim’s Pretrial Motion

At a Glance

  • What: ‌ The South Jakarta District Court rejected Nadiem Makarim’s‌ pretrial lawsuit.
  • where: ​South Jakarta District‌ Court (PN Jaksel).
  • When: ⁤Monday, October 13, 2025.
  • Why it Matters: This decision allows ⁣the Attorney General’s Office to proceed‌ with its investigation‌ and potential prosecution of Nadiem Makarim.
  • What’s Next: the​ case will⁢ proceed ⁢to the next stage of the legal process, ‍potentially⁢ involving further investigation​ and a trial.

Jakarta – The single ⁣judge at the South Jakarta district Court (PN Jaksel) rejected the pretrial lawsuit filed by the former ⁤Minister of Education⁤ and Culture Nadiem Anwar Makarim. In his considerations, the judge said that the Attorney⁤ General’s Office ⁤(Kejagung) named the⁢ suspect based ​on more than two pieces of evidence.

“Considering that,based on ​the matters described above,formally the respondent has four valid pieces of evidence according to the provisions of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure⁢ Code as‌ a basis for ⁣determining the applicant as ‌a suspect,” said single judge ‌I Ketut Darpawan in the ‍main courtroom of the South Jakarta ⁣District Court,monday (13/10/2025).

“considering that based on the ⁤considerations that have been made above, the respondent’s action in determining the applicant as a suspect is legal according ​to law,” continued the judge.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

In his considerations, the judge also answered the request that there must be⁣ evidence in the form of​ calculating‌ state losses ⁣as one ‌of ⁤the⁢ minimum two‌ pieces of ⁤evidence⁢ to identify a suspect.According to the judge, this is the investigator’s authority.

“Because ⁣this is a form‍ of ‌testing the investigator’s authority in terms of choosing to use

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

applicant's pretrial application, article 184 kuhap, attorney general, Attorney General's Office, Corruption, criminal, criminal act, detention, follow, hakim, I'm not sure what to do., investigator's authority, jail, judge's consideration of rejecting nadiem makarim's pretrial lawsuit, KUHAP, laptop chromebook, Nadeem's suspect status, Nadem's pretrial, Nadiem makarim, pn Jakarta, pretrial judge, pretrial lawsuit, prosecutor, subtract, suspect, Suspect Nadem Makarim, suspect status, suspect's actions, threat

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service