Kang Myeong-gu’s Telegram Conversation Sparks Disciplinary Action Against Park Yeon-jin and Jin Jong-o
- The People Power Party (PPP) Ethics Committee is reviewing potential disciplinary actions against dozens of lawmakers following internal conflicts over party loyalty and leadership, according to a June...
- The disciplinary review centers on a rift between different factions within the party, specifically targeting those aligned with the "pro-Han" wing.
- The report identifies lawmakers Bae Hyun-jin and Jin Jong-oh as individuals specifically mentioned in these communications.
The People Power Party (PPP) Ethics Committee is reviewing potential disciplinary actions against dozens of lawmakers following internal conflicts over party loyalty and leadership, according to a June 30, 2026, report by JoongAng Ilbo. The review was triggered by Telegram conversations involving Vice Chairperson Kang Myung-gu, which identified specific lawmakers, including Bae Hyun-jin and Jin Jong-oh, as targets for disciplinary measures.
Why is the PPP Ethics Committee reviewing lawmakers?
The disciplinary review centers on a rift between different factions within the party, specifically targeting those aligned with the “pro-Han” wing. According to JoongAng Ilbo, Vice Chairperson Kang Myung-gu initiated the process after Telegram messages surfaced that discussed the disciplinary status of several party members.

The report identifies lawmakers Bae Hyun-jin and Jin Jong-oh as individuals specifically mentioned in these communications. While Kang described the exchanges as simple discussions
, the leak of these conversations has escalated into what JoongAng Ilbo characterizes as a disciplinary civil war within the party.
How did the Telegram leak trigger the conflict?
The conflict intensified when internal communications shifted from private deliberations to a catalyst for formal party sanctions. JoongAng Ilbo reports that the mention of specific names in the Telegram chats provided the impetus for the Ethics Committee to expand its scope to dozens of lawmakers.
This development indicates a shift in the party’s internal power dynamics, as the Ethics Committee now considers sanctions against a broad group of representatives rather than isolated individuals. The focus remains on the adherence of these lawmakers to party directives and their relationships with the party leadership.
What are the implications for the party leadership?
The scale of the review suggests a significant internal struggle for control. By reviewing dozens of members, the Ethics Committee is addressing a systemic challenge to party discipline. The involvement of high-profile figures like Bae Hyun-jin and Jin Jong-oh suggests that the sanctions may target influential members of the party’s legislative caucus.
The situation highlights a tension between those seeking strict party discipline and those who view the disciplinary moves as politically motivated targeting of specific factions. The outcome of these reviews will determine the extent to which the party leadership can enforce loyalty among its members ahead of future legislative sessions.
