Benevolent sexism, disguised as helpfulness, is quietly hindering women’s progress in medicine, a new study reveals. Uncover how seemingly positive attitudes, like offering unsolicited advice or overlooking women for leadership, can subtly limit career advancement for women in the workplace, even in environments committed to gender equity. News Directory 3 shares how researchers in academic medicine found women feeling disrespected,assigned non-promotable tasks,and facing gender bias. The study also exposes the impact of protective paternalism disguised as kindness. discover what’s next to dismantle these barriers and foster true equality in the field.
Benevolent Sexism: Study Shows How “Helpful” Attitudes Hold Women Back
Updated June 2, 2025
Workplace sexism often takes the form of overt hostility. however,a recent study highlights how subtler behaviors,seemingly intended to help,can also impede women’s progress. This research delves into benevolent sexism in academic medicine, revealing how it can quietly limit women’s careers, even in environments committed to gender equity and women in the workplace.
Benevolent sexism, as defined by Glick and Fiske, encompasses attitudes that appear positive, such as a desire to protect or assist women. Unlike hostile sexism, benevolent sexism often manifests as protective paternalism, assumptions about women’s fragility, or the reinforcement of gendered roles. examples include offering unsolicited help or discouraging women from leadership roles due to perceived burnout risk.
Academic medicine,where representation and equity are crucial,sees women still facing disparities. A 2023 survey found that 27% of women felt disrespected at work, often due to their gender. This was especially true for women from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds, who reported higher rates of unfair treatment and slower career advancement. While hostile sexism has been widely studied, benevolent sexism remains under-examined.
A 2022 climate survey targeting women faculty revealed troubling trends. Key concerns included being perceived as less capable, receiving unsolicited advice, feeling overlooked for leadership, and being assigned non-promotable tasks. Women also expressed frustration at being expected to smile more or accept poor support without complaint, including being punished for rejecting paternalistic assistance. The study highlighted the impact of gender bias.
“As a junior faculty with young children, hearing that I was not considered for a position because I was ‘most likely needed at home’ felt incredibly disheartening. Intended perhaps as helpful, the message was that I wasn’t seen as capable.”
Open-ended responses revealed frustration with unconscious gender bias and the expectation to remain cheerful and tolerant.Suggestions included more leadership opportunities for women, training to address benevolent sexism, safe spaces for women to speak up, and increased accountability for inappropriate behavior.
The study underscores that benevolent sexism, often masked as support, leads to missed opportunities and labels women as “ungrateful” when they resist it. Protective paternalism, in particular, acts as a key barrier to women’s advancement, reinforcing inequality under the guise of kindness.
What’s next
Moving forward, institutions must train leaders to recognize subtle biases, audit decision-making processes for gendered assumptions, reward contributions that may go unnoticed due to gender norms, and create structures that ensure equal chance for leadership and advancement. addressing benevolent sexism requires challenging the “helpful” behaviors that hold women back.
