KISS Gene Simmons: Radio Pays Artists Worse Than Slaves
- KISS bassist Gene Simmons passionately advocated for the Music Fairness Act before a US Senate subcommittee, arguing that American musicians are unfairly compensated for radio airplay.
- Gene Simmons testified before the US Senate Judiciary subcommittee on December 9th,2023,in support of the Music Fairness Act.
- Currently, in the United States, terrestrial AM/FM radio stations are not required to pay royalties for the *performance* of a song - only for the underlying composition (lyrics...
“`html
Gene Simmons Testifies to Senate: US Artists Treated “Worse than Slaves”
Table of Contents
KISS bassist Gene Simmons passionately advocated for the Music Fairness Act before a US Senate subcommittee, arguing that American musicians are unfairly compensated for radio airplay.
What Happened?
Gene Simmons testified before the US Senate Judiciary subcommittee on December 9th,2023,in support of the Music Fairness Act. He argued that the current system, where radio stations only pay for song composition and not the sound recording itself, is deeply unjust to artists and labels. Simmons’ testimony centered on the disparity between the recognition of American music globally and the lack of financial return for those who create it.
the Core Issue: Airplay Royalties
Currently, in the United States, terrestrial AM/FM radio stations are not required to pay royalties for the *performance* of a song – only for the underlying composition (lyrics and melody). This means songwriters receive payment when their songs are played on the radio, but the artists who perform the song, and the record labels who invest in its production and promotion, do not. This is a meaningful difference from many other countries, including the UK and Canada, where performance royalties are collected and distributed.
The Music Fairness Act aims to correct this imbalance by requiring radio stations to license the sound recordings themselves, ensuring that artists and labels receive fair compensation for airplay. This would create a more equitable system, similar to those in place for digital radio and streaming services.
Simmons’ Powerful testimony
Simmons delivered a notably strong statement, declaring that opposing the bill was “un-American.” He drew a stark comparison, stating that artists are treated “worse than slaves,” emphasizing that even enslaved people received sustenance, while musicians receive nothing for their performances on the radio. He invoked the legacies of iconic american artists like Elvis Presley, Frank Sinatra, and Bing Crosby, suggesting they were also deprived of fair compensation under the current system.
The Impact on Artists and the Music Industry
The lack of performance royalties disproportionately affects independent artists and smaller labels, who rely heavily on radio airplay for exposure and revenue. While established artists may have diversified income streams, many emerging musicians depend on royalties to sustain their careers. The Music Fairness Act could provide a crucial lifeline for these artists,fostering a more vibrant and sustainable music ecosystem.
| Royalty Type | Who Receives Payment |
|---|---|
| Composition Royalty | Songwriters & Publishers |
| Performance Royalty (Currently NOT paid by AM/FM radio in the US) | Artists, Record Labels, & Performers |
Past Context and Global Practices
The US system is an outlier among developed nations.Most countries have established systems for collecting and distributing performance royalties, ensuring that artists are compensated for the public performance of their work. The debate over performance royalties in the US dates back decades, with various attempts to introduce similar legislation failing in the past. The rise of digital streaming has further highlighted the disparity, as streaming services *do* pay performance royalties.
Frequently asked Questions
- What is the Music Fairness Act?
- The Music fairness Act is proposed legislation that would require AM/FM radio stations