Kronologi Shella Saukia Polisikan Nikita Mirzani
- Jakarta - Entrepreneur and social media influencer Shella Saukia has officially filed a complaint against Nikita Mirzani at the Polda Metro Jaya.
- Saukia claims that Nikita Mirzani publicly disparaged her through social media channels.
- During this TikTok live session, Nikita Mirzani allegedly made defamatory statements about Shella Saukia.
Shella Saukia Takes Legal Action Against Nikita Mirzani Over Alleged Defamation
Table of Contents
Published: March 20,2025
Defamation Claim Filed in Jakarta
Jakarta – Entrepreneur and social media influencer Shella Saukia has officially filed a complaint against Nikita Mirzani at the Polda Metro Jaya. The basis of the report centers around allegations of defamation, stemming from comments made by Mirzani on social media.
Saukia claims that Nikita Mirzani publicly disparaged her through social media channels. The specific incident that triggered the legal action occurred on January 17, 2025, during a live TikTok broadcast.
During this TikTok live session, Nikita Mirzani allegedly made defamatory statements about Shella Saukia. The video of this broadcast serves as key evidence in Saukia’s legal pursuit.
Details of the TikTok Live Incident
According to Shella Saukia’s legal representative,Petrus Bala Pattyona,the tiktok live session lasted eight minutes and was viewed by approximately 115,000 accounts. Pattyona stated on Thursday, March 20, 2025, at Polda metro Jaya, “Live TikTok selama 8 menit yang ditonton oleh 115 ribu akun. Selama live TikTok itu dia (Nikita Mirzani) mengata-ngatai Shella Saukia ular, hantu,” indicating that Mirzani allegedly called Saukia names such as a snake and a ghost during the broadcast.
Attacks on Personal Character and Business
Petrus Bala Pattyona further explained that Nikita Mirzani’s verbal attacks began early in the live broadcast and were directly aimed at Shella Saukia. The comments were not limited to personal insults; Mirzani also reportedly targeted Saukia’s skincare line.
The legal representative quoted Mirzani as saying, “(Nikita bilang) Jangan beli produknya karena produknya berbahaya yang bisa menimbulkan kanker kulit. Produknya dibilang air ingus. ‘Ini bukan serum, ini air ingus’. Dia juga bilang, ‘Jijik, kalian jangan pakai’,” suggesting Mirzani warned viewers against purchasing Saukia’s products, claiming they were dangerous and of poor quality.
Impact on Business and Reputation
These statements allegedly had a direct negative impact on shella Saukia’s business. Saukia contends that her reputation has been damaged as a result of Mirzani’s words.
Petrus emphasized the severity of the situation, stating, “Setelah Nikita menjelek-jelekkan penjualan menurun. Jadi selain nama baiknya jelek, karena SS dikatain sebagai hantu, sebagai binatang, padahal dia manusia,” highlighting the decline in sales and the demeaning nature of the insults.
Legal Proceedings and Evidence
Shella saukia officially filed the report against Nikita Mirzani on January 19, 2025.On March 20, 2025, Saukia was summoned to Polda Metro Jaya to provide clarification as the reporting witness.
During her visit, Saukia answered 26 questions from investigators and presented printed video evidence of Nikita Mirzani’s alleged defamatory statements.
According to her legal representative, “Ada 8 halaman kita print, tadi dipilih oleh penyidik kata-kata mana yang dianggap mencemarkan,” indicating that specific defamatory statements were identified from the printed transcripts.
Shella Saukia vs. Nikita Mirzani: A Defamation lawsuit Explained
This article provides a extensive overview of the defamation lawsuit filed by Shella Saukia against Nikita Mirzani.
What is the Lawsuit About?
What is the basis of Shella Saukia’s lawsuit against Nikita Mirzani?
The lawsuit, filed in Jakarta, centers on allegations of defamation. shella Saukia claims that Nikita Mirzani made defamatory statements about her on social media, specifically during a live TikTok broadcast.
What specific incident triggered this legal action?
The incident that triggered the legal action occurred on January 17, 2025, during a live TikTok session where Nikita Mirzani allegedly made several disparaging remarks about Shella Saukia.
Details of the Alleged Defamatory Statements
What happened during the TikTok live session?
During the TikTok live session, wich lasted approximately eight minutes and had around 115,000 viewers, Nikita Mirzani allegedly made multiple defamatory statements about Shella Saukia.
What specific insults were made against Shella Saukia?
Nikita Mirzani allegedly called Shella Saukia names such as a “snake” and a ”ghost” during the TikTok live broadcast.
Did the verbal attacks extend beyond personal insults?
yes, the attacks extended beyond personal insults and also targeted Shella Saukia’s skincare line.
What was said about Shella Saukia’s skincare products?
Nikita Mirzani allegedly warned viewers not to purchase Shella Saukia’s skincare products, claiming they were dangerous and of poor quality. She reportedly stated, “Jangan beli produknya karena produknya berbahaya yang bisa menimbulkan kanker kulit. Produknya dibilang air ingus. ‘Ini bukan serum, ini air ingus’. Dia juga bilang, ’Jijik, kalian jangan pakai’,” which translates to, “Don’t buy her products because they are dangerous and can cause skin cancer. The product is said to be snot. ‘This is not a serum, this is snot’. She also said, ‘Disgusting, don’t use it’.”
Impact and Legal Proceedings
What impact did these statements have on Shella Saukia’s business?
The statements allegedly caused a direct negative impact on Shella Saukia’s business, leading to a decline in sales.
What impact did these statements have on Shella Saukia’s reputation?
Shella Saukia contends that her online reputation has been damaged as an inevitable result of Mirzani’s words.
When was the legal complaint filed?
Shella Saukia officially filed the report against nikita Mirzani on January 19, 2025.
What legal actions have been taken so far?
Shella Saukia was summoned to the Polda Metro Jaya on March 20,2025,to provide clarification and answer questions as the reporting witness. She responded to 26 questions from investigators and presented printed video evidence of the alleged defamatory statements.
Printed transcripts of the video, highlighting specific defamatory statements, were presented as evidence.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
| ——————— | ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- |
| Plaintiff | Shella Saukia |
| Defendant | Nikita mirzani |
| Claim | Defamation |
| Incident Date | January 17, 2025 (TikTok Live) |
| Alleged Statements | Insults (snake, ghost), criticism of skincare products (dangerous, poor quality) |
| Impact | Decline in sales, damage to online reputation |
| Legal Action | Complaint filed January 19, 2025; Saukia summoned to Polda Metro Jaya March 20, 2025; 26 questions answered; video evidence presented. |