Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Kuscco's Sh5.3 Billion Bad Loans - News Directory 3

Kuscco’s Sh5.3 Billion Bad Loans

March 9, 2025 Catherine Williams Business
News Context
At a glance
  • A recent audit report concerning the Kenya Union of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (KUSCCO) has brought to light significant loan mismanagement.
  • The PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) audit indicates that by December 2023, KUSCCO had accumulated a staggering Sh5.3 billion in non-performing loans (NPLs).This alarming figure represented 60 percent⁣ of the total...
  • Instances of questionable loan approvals include an employee receiving a⁢ Sh2 million loan despite having only Sh17,000 in savings.Another⁢ case involved a Sh1.5 million disbursement against a mere...
Original source: standardmedia.co.ke

KUSCCO Audit Exposes Sh5.3 Billion in Non-Performing Loans

Table of Contents

  • KUSCCO Audit Exposes Sh5.3 Billion in Non-Performing Loans
    • Extent of the Non-Performing Loans
    • Unraveling the KUSCCO Fraud
    • Loan Distribution and Performance
      • Non-Performing⁤ Loan Breakdown
    • Irregular Loan Practices
    • implication of Staff Members
    • The Role of⁣ Senior Management
    • Questionable Transactions
    • Ototo’s Loans and⁢ Lack of collateral
    • lack of Write-Off ⁣Policy
  • KUSCCO’s Financial Crisis: Your Questions Answered
    • Understanding the KUSCCO Audit and Non-Performing Loans
      • What is‍ KUSCCO, and what is ⁣its role in Kenya?
      • What triggered the KUSCCO audit?
      • What are Non-Performing Loans (NPLs), and why are they a concern?
      • How extensive are the ‍Non-Performing Loans at ⁢KUSCCO?
      • Which KUSCCO funds were most⁤ affected by Non-Performing Loans?
      • What are the ⁢specific KUSCCO funds mentioned in the audit report?
    • Irregular Loan Practices and Mismanagement
      • What kind of irregular loan practices were uncovered in the audit?

KUSCCO Building
Former KUSCCO MD George ⁣Ototo approved some loans based on ‘trust’ rather than collateral. [File, Standard]

A recent audit report concerning the Kenya Union of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (KUSCCO) has brought to light significant loan mismanagement. The audit reveals a pattern of loans being disbursed to both Saccos and senior ⁢staff without adequate verification of their repayment capabilities.

Extent of the Non-Performing Loans

The PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) audit indicates that by December 2023, KUSCCO had accumulated a staggering Sh5.3 billion in non-performing loans (NPLs).This alarming figure represented 60 percent⁣ of the total Sh9 billion in outstanding loans at that time.



Instances of questionable loan approvals include an employee receiving a⁢ Sh2 million loan despite having only Sh17,000 in savings.Another⁢ case involved a Sh1.5 million disbursement against a mere Sh1,300‍ in savings. These revelations raise serious concerns about the due ⁣diligence processes within KUSCCO.

Unraveling the KUSCCO Fraud

reports of fraud at KUSCCO ⁤emerged last year, leading ⁣to the removal of senior managers ‍and board members. However,⁣ the⁢ full extent of the alleged theft, estimated at Sh13 billion, is only⁢ now being uncovered. Several senior executives are already facing charges in court related to ⁣these shady financial dealings.

While some Saccos genuinely struggled with repayments due to remittance challenges,⁤ others continued to receive top-up loans even with existing non-performing advances.⁤ This practice further⁤ exacerbated the financial strain on KUSCCO.

Loan Distribution and Performance

The audit report details how KUSCCO⁢ issued loans from various funds, including the Central Finance Fund (CFF), KUSCCO Housing Fund (KHF), KUSCCO Housing Cooperative (KHC), and⁣ its front office service activity (Fosa), known ‍as Kusasa. These loans, intended for member Saccos without banking services,⁣ resulted in ‍NPLs⁣ reaching as high as 84 percent.

  • Kusasa: Established ⁢in 2004, Kusasa stands for KUSCCO Savings Accounts.
  • CFF: Initiated in 1989, ⁤the Central Finance Fund aimed to⁣ mobilize funds within cooperative savings ‍and credit circles.
  • KHF: started in 1996, the KUSCCO Housing Fund focuses on lending to ⁤individuals seeking property ownership and mortgage financing solutions.
  • KHC: provides loans for house construction,plot purchases,and funding of controlled ‍developments.

Non-Performing⁤ Loan Breakdown

At the time of the audit, the CFF held the highest NPLs, totaling⁢ Sh3.3 billion, which was 84 percent of its Sh3.9 billion loan balance. This amount was distributed⁢ among 306 Saccos.

Fund Loans Awarded Loan Balance⁣ (KES) Non-performing Loans (KES)
CFF To 306 saccos 3.9 Billion 3.3 Billion (84%)
KHF to 1,962 members 3.9 Billion 1.9 Billion
KHC To 313 members N/A 44 Million
Kusasa To 967 members 160.1 Million 67.4 Million

The KHF issued loans to 1,962 ⁣members and had a loan⁢ balance ‍of Sh3.9 billion as of December 2023, with Sh1.9 billion classified as non-performing. In contrast, the KHC, which awarded loans to 313 members, had the lowest NPLs at Sh44 million. Kusasa, with loans to 967 members, had a loan balance of ⁣Sh160.1⁤ million, of ⁤which Sh67.4‍ million was non-performing.

Stay informed. Subscribe to our newsletter

Irregular Loan Practices

The audit team highlighted that⁢ while these figures require further validation, several⁤ significant issues were apparent. Some loans were recorded as cleared without evidence of repayments or savings.Large facilities issued to staff and KUSCCO-related parties⁣ were particularly concerning.

For example, one Sacco with an outstanding balance⁤ of Sh377.5 million received⁣ an instant loan of Sh100 million just four months‍ after making ‍a⁣ single installment on a previous Sh83 million loan. The initial loan was⁣ disbursed on December 22, 2017, followed by the Sh100 million on May 25, 2018.

As of⁣ December 31,⁣ 2023, ⁣the two loans were non-performing with outstanding balances double the disbursed amounts amounting to Sh170.8 million ⁤and Sh206.6 million.

Another instance involved ‍a sacco receiving a Sh3.5 million education loan and, after only four installments, receiving an‍ additional Sh5 million under the CFF’s instant premium loan product. These loans, issued on ⁣December 20, 2017, and December 6, 2018, respectively, were‍ also non-performing as of December 31, 2023.

It is to be noted that no repayments have been made towards the second loan. We understand the Sacco has not been paying due to liquidity ⁢constraints, however, we did ⁣not see any evidence of CFF making any efforts to⁤ recover the loan.

implication of Staff Members

A former branch manager was also implicated in the unpaid loans. Kusasa issued the manager two loans in ⁢2016 and 2022, amounting to Sh1.3 million and Sh2 million, respectively. However, there was no evidence of payments on the first loan when the second was issued.

The manager had only ⁢Sh17,000 in savings, ⁤far short of the Sh400,000 required as security for the Sh2 million loan, and no‍ property was provided as alternative security. By December 2023, these loans⁢ were⁤ non-performing, ‍totaling Sh1.3 million and Sh2.3 million, respectively.

However, we noted that Lawrence Mawira, former Kusasa loan officer, indicated that 20 per cent of savings were raised towards the Sh1.3 million, which goes ⁣against what we have‍ observed.

A former KUSCCO finance manager⁣ received a Sh1.5 million loan in 2023 despite having three ‍previous non-performing facilities.Auditors⁢ found no evidence of collateral for this loan.

We‍ did⁢ not see evidence of any collateral provided against the⁤ sh1.5 million loan disbursed on July 10, 2023.

Along with these facilities, the manager received more loans totaling over Sh10⁤ million.

The Role of⁣ Senior Management

According to the report,members with loans in KHF‍ should ⁤not have been awarded additional ‍loans in KHC. However, exceptions were made.

…according to Mr ⁤Odera⁤ (Julius Odera, then⁢ KHF manager now KHC chief executive), Mr Ototo (George Ototo, former KUSCCO group managing ⁢director) exempted some employees based on the trust that they ⁤woudl pay their loans.

Ototo is also implicated ‍in approving an Sh11.5 million loan to Malachi Mwango⁢ between july 20, 2015, and January 6,⁢ 2017, which was ⁤non-performing as of August 7, 2024. Odera stated that Ototo ‍instructed him to approve the⁣ loan despite non-payment, with a note from Ototo dated June⁢ 3, 2016, supporting ⁣this claim.

Questionable Transactions

The audit also raised questions about payments of Sh5.4 million to the loan account of Redempter Akinyi, a KHF ⁢marketer, deposited by⁣ Billy Onyango, a cash buyer of four houses⁣ at the KUSCCO‍ homes Project. Akinyi had two KHF loans for plot⁢ finance and construction, totaling Sh1.4 million and Sh5 million, respectively.

Auditors were puzzled by how money intended for purchasing houses at the Sh1.5 billion KUSCCO homes Project ended⁢ up⁤ in Akinyi’s loan account.

We requested for⁢ the supporting documentation that went to reducing Ms Akinyi’s loan by Sh5.4 million but none could be traced.

Ms Akinyi did not also provide us with any evidence of the money in question having been deposited with KUSCCO, which could ⁤point to ⁤the entries being fraudulent.

The report further notes that Akinyi was the relationship manager for the properties purchased by⁣ Onyango.

Ototo’s Loans and⁢ Lack of collateral

Ototo allegedly pressured financial managers to issue loans without verifying the ability to repay. He received Sh10 million on June 30,2022,and Sh2.6 million ‍on November 24, 2023, from Kusasa.

For both loans he provided savings security that were less than 20 per cent of the loan savings ⁣required for the loans; that is, Sh100,000 and Sh400,000 rather of Sh2 million and Sh520,000.

No collateral was pledged for either loan,and the Kusasa branch manager was unaware of the approvals. As of December 31, 2023, both loans⁤ were non-performing, with balances of Sh10.9 million and⁢ Sh3.2 million, respectively.

When Ototo received the last tranches of his KHF ⁣loan of Sh31.5 million⁢ and ⁢KHC facility of Sh51 million, his savings were substantially less than required, with Sh203,000 and Sh222,000 in savings instead of the necessary Sh5.6 million and Sh10.4 million.

As of December 31, ⁢2023, the KHC loan was performing, while the KHF ⁢loan was non-performing.

lack of Write-Off ⁣Policy

The audit revealed that KUSCCO and its subsidiaries lacked a write-off policy for non-performing loans during the period under review (2018 to 2023). Additionally,⁢ there ⁤was no provision for ‍loan loss in ⁣their financial ⁤statements,‍ except in 2022 when KHF made a provision of Sh28.8 million.

KUSCCO’s Financial Crisis: Your Questions Answered

A recent audit has revealed critically important financial mismanagement at the Kenya⁤ Union of Savings and Credit ‍cooperatives (KUSCCO). This⁤ Q&A article breaks down the key ⁤findings of the audit, ‍the implications of the non-performing loans, and what it means for KUSCCO members and⁤ the broader cooperative sector.

Understanding the KUSCCO Audit and Non-Performing Loans

What is‍ KUSCCO, and what is ⁣its role in Kenya?

The Kenya⁤ Union of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (KUSCCO) is the umbrella body for Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies (SACCOs) in Kenya. Its primary role is to champion, represent, and serve the interests of SACCOs, providing them with financial and technical support to enhance their operations and expand their reach. KUSCCO also plays a crucial role in advocating for a favorable policy and regulatory habitat for the cooperative movement in Kenya.

What triggered the KUSCCO audit?

Reports of significant fraud,estimated at Sh13 billion,surfaced last year,prompting the removal of senior managers and board members. The audit was commissioned to uncover the full extent of the alleged⁣ theft and ⁤financial mismanagement.

What are Non-Performing Loans (NPLs), and why are they a concern?

Non-Performing ‍Loans (NPLs) are loans where the borrower has not made scheduled payments for a specified period, making it unlikely that the principal amount will‍ be repaid.They are a significant concern because:

Reduced Profitability: NPLs reduce a financial institution’s profitability as they ⁢generate no income ‍but still require capital reserves.

Liquidity Issues: High levels of NPLs⁤ can‍ strain an institution’s liquidity, making it difficult to meet its obligations.

Capital Erosion: Significant NPLs can erode a financial institution’s capital base, threatening its solvency.

Economic Impact: High NPLs can reduce the⁤ availability of credit in ⁤the economy, hindering economic growth.

How extensive are the ‍Non-Performing Loans at ⁢KUSCCO?

As of December 2023,KUSCCO had accumulated Sh5.3 billion in non-Performing Loans (NPLs). This ⁤alarming figure represents 60% of the total Sh9 billion in outstanding loans.

Which KUSCCO funds were most⁤ affected by Non-Performing Loans?

The Central Finance Fund (CFF) was the most affected, with NPLs‍ totaling Sh3.3 billion, which was 84% of its Sh3.9 billion loan balance.

What are the ⁢specific KUSCCO funds mentioned in the audit report?

Central Finance Fund (CFF): Initiated in 1989, the ⁢CFF aimed to mobilize funds within cooperative savings and credit circles.

KUSCCO Housing Fund (KHF): Started in⁤ 1996, the KHF focuses on lending to individuals seeking property ownership and mortgage financing solutions.

KUSCCO Housing Cooperative (KHC): Provides‍ loans for house construction, plot ⁢purchases, and funding of controlled developments.

Kusasa: ⁣ Established in 2004, Kusasa stands for KUSCCO ⁤Savings Accounts and serves as its front office service⁢ activity (FOSA).

Irregular Loan Practices and Mismanagement

What kind of irregular loan practices were uncovered in the audit?

The audit revealed several concerning practices:

Loans Approved Without collateral: Several instances of loans being approved without adequate collateral or verification of repayment ability. Former KUSCCO MD George Ototo⁢ is ⁤alleged to have approved some loans based on “trust” ‍rather than collateral.

Loans to Staff Members with Little Savings: An employee received a Sh2 million loan ⁣despite having only ⁤Sh17,000 in savings. Another received a Sh1.5 million loan against a mere Sh1,300 in savings.

*‍ ⁣ Top-Up loans to Struggling⁢ saccos: Some SACCOs⁢ continued to receive

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Worth a look

  • Inside Firmus AI Data Center IPO And Its Soaring Valuation Risks
  • Skoda Recalls 1.7 Million Vehicles Worldwide Over Steering Corrosion Risk

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com