Liu Xingyi Supports University Autonomy, Calls for Ministry of Education Oversight
Taiwan University Presidential Election Controversy Resurfaces During Judicial Nominee Hearing
Taipei, Taiwan – The 2018 National Taiwan University presidential election controversy resurfaced during a legislative Yuan hearing today, as Kuomintang (KMT) legislators questioned Judicial Yuan Justice nominee Liu Jinji about his views on the incident.
Liu, a professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Development Studies and a renowned legal scholar, is currently under review by the Legislative Yuan Committee of the whole for his nomination to the Judicial Yuan.
during the hearing, KMT legislators chen yuzhen, Weng Xiaoling, and Xu Qiaoxin repeatedly brought up the 2018 election, wich saw Quan Zhongmin elected as the new president by the university’s selection committee. However, the Ministry of Education (MOE) deemed the election process flawed, sparking a heated debate about university autonomy versus government oversight.
The controversy culminated in then-Minister of Education Ye Junrong reluctantly agreeing to appoint Quan Zhongmin as president on December 24, 2018, after months of deadlock.chen Yuzhen referenced past statements by Liu Jinji questioning Quan Zhongmin’s qualifications, asking if his stance remained unchanged. Liu affirmed his previous position, stating he stood by his past remarks.
Weng Xiaoling inquired about the impact of the prolonged period without an official president on National Taiwan University’s operations. Liu emphasized that an acting president was in place during that time, ensuring the smooth functioning of the university.
He reiterated his belief in genuine university autonomy in electing its president, while acknowledging the MOE’s role in ensuring legal compliance.
Weng Xiaoling further questioned whether the MOE should have ultimately approved quan Zhongmin’s appointment. Liu’s response was not included in the provided facts.
The 2018 National Taiwan University presidential election remains a contentious issue in taiwan, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the balance between university autonomy and government oversight in higher education.
taiwan lawmaker Sparks Debate Over University Autonomy
Taipei,Taiwan – A recent legislative hearing in Taiwan has reignited the debate over university autonomy,with lawmakers clashing over the role of government oversight in academic affairs.
The controversy stems from comments made by lawmaker Liu Xingyi, who expressed support for university autonomy but emphasized the need for legal supervision by the Ministry of Education.This stance drew criticism from fellow lawmaker Liu Jinji, who argued that the approval process for university presidents was rushed and lacked sufficient consideration for academic freedom.
“I believe the approval was too hasty at the time,” Liu Jinji stated, referencing the appointment of a new university president.
The exchange highlighted the ongoing tension between the desire for institutional independence and the government’s obligation to ensure accountability and adherence to regulations.
Weng Xiaoling, another legislator, weighed in on the discussion, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of university autonomy. “University autonomy includes academic freedom, internal institution, and staff autonomy,” Weng explained. “It is indeed a pity that I have not heard that you support university autonomy,” she added, addressing Liu Xingyi’s comments.
Liu Xingyi maintained his position, asserting that while he supports university autonomy, legal supervision by the Ministry of Education is crucial.
The debate over university autonomy is a recurring theme in Taiwan’s political landscape, reflecting broader concerns about the balance between academic freedom and government oversight. As Taiwan continues to navigate its complex political and social landscape, the role of universities and the extent of their autonomy will remain a subject of intense discussion and scrutiny.
Taiwan University Presidential Election Controversy Resurfaces in Hearing
Taipei, Taiwan – The contentious 2018 National Taiwan University presidential election resurfaced during a Legislative Yuan hearing, as KMT legislators grilled Judicial Yuan Justice nominee Liu Jinji about his views on the embattled election.
Liu, a respected legal scholar and professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Development studies, faced pointed questions from KMT legislators Chen Yuzhen, Weng Xiaoling, and Xu Qiaoxin regarding his stance on the selection of Quan Zhongmin as NTU president.
The 2018 election saw Quan Zhongmin preferred by the university’s selection committee. However, the ministry of Education (MOE) deemed the process flawed, igniting a fierce debate about the balance between university autonomy and governmental oversight.
Months of deadlock ensued, culminating in then-Minister of Education Ye Junrong reluctantly agreeing to Quan Zhongmin’s appointment on December 24, 2018.
Chen Yuzhen directly challenged Liu, referencing past statements querying Quan Zhongmin’s qualifications. Liu affirmed his previous position. Weng Xiaoling inquired about the impact of the prolonged period without an official president.
Liu stressed that an acting president ensured the university’s smooth operation during that time. While reiterating his belief in genuine university autonomy in electing presidents, he also acknowledged the MOE’s role in guaranteeing legal compliance.
When questioned whether the MOE should have ultimately approved Quan Zhongmin’s appointment, Liu’s response was not included in theCCTV report.
The 2018 National taiwan University presidential election remains a flashpoint,highlighting the ongoing debate about the delicate balance between university autonomy and government oversight in Taiwan’s higher education system.