Livia Brito: Actress Faces Trial for Alleged False Statements in Paparazzi Case

Mexico City – Actress Livia Brito will not be facing a trial for allegedly falsifying statements related to a 2020 incident involving a photographer, according to a ruling made on February 6, 2026. The decision stems from a case initially brought by paparazzi photographer Ernesto Zepeda and his legal counsel, Ángela Frías, who accused Brito of misrepresenting events surrounding an alleged assault.

The legal proceedings, as reported by judicial authorities and specialized media, centered on whether Brito provided false information regarding an altercation with Zepeda. Zepeda and Frías filed a complaint in 2024, alleging that Brito denied having physically attacked the photographer during the incident several years prior. The initial complaint triggered an investigation into potential charges of false declaration.

However, the recent ruling indicates that the judge determined insufficient evidence to proceed with a trial on the charge of falsifying statements. While the specific details of the judge’s reasoning haven’t been publicly released, the decision effectively closes this particular legal avenue for Zepeda and Frías.

This development doesn’t necessarily resolve the underlying dispute between Brito and Zepeda. The initial incident, which occurred in 2020, involved accusations from Zepeda that Brito and her companions physically assaulted him while he was attempting to photograph her. Brito, in turn, has maintained her innocence and claimed that her privacy was violated by the photographer’s actions. She has publicly stated, through various media appearances, that Zepeda’s pursuit of photographs constituted an invasion of her personal space.

The case has garnered significant attention in both Mexican and international entertainment news, largely due to Brito’s high profile as a telenovela star. Brito has built a substantial following through roles in popular Spanish-language television dramas, including “Abismo de Pasión” and “Médicos, Vida o Muerte.” Her celebrity status inevitably amplified the scrutiny surrounding the legal battle.

The photographer, Ernesto Zepeda, is a well-known figure in the Mexican entertainment press, frequently covering celebrity events and capturing candid photographs of public figures. His decision to pursue legal action against Brito highlighted the ongoing tensions between paparazzi and celebrities regarding privacy and the right to photograph individuals in public spaces.

The initial investigation focused on determining whether Brito’s statements to authorities accurately reflected the events of the 2020 incident. The prosecution needed to demonstrate that Brito knowingly provided false information with the intent to mislead investigators. The judge’s decision suggests that the prosecution was unable to meet this burden of proof regarding the alleged false declaration.

It’s important to note that the dismissal of the falsification of statements charge does not preclude the possibility of other legal actions related to the 2020 incident. Depending on the evidence and the interpretation of the law, Zepeda could potentially pursue other claims, such as those related to physical assault or emotional distress. However, the current ruling significantly narrows the scope of the legal battle.

The case also raises broader questions about the legal protections afforded to celebrities and the rights of the paparazzi. The balance between a public figure’s right to privacy and the media’s right to gather news is a complex and often contentious issue. This case, while specific to Brito and Zepeda, reflects a larger debate about the boundaries of celebrity coverage and the ethical considerations involved in paparazzi photography.

As of today, February 7, 2026, Brito’s representatives have not issued a formal statement regarding the judge’s decision. However, sources close to the actress indicate that she is relieved by the outcome and intends to focus on her upcoming professional projects. Brito is currently involved in pre-production for a new television series, details of which have not yet been publicly disclosed.

The resolution of this legal matter allows Brito to move forward with her career without the distraction of ongoing court proceedings. While the incident undoubtedly left a mark on her public image, the dismissal of the falsification charge represents a significant victory for the actress. The case serves as a reminder of the legal complexities surrounding celebrity encounters with the paparazzi and the challenges of navigating the intersection of privacy, publicity, and the law.