Man Sentenced to Jail for Stalking and Threatening Ex-Girlfriend: A Case of Repeat Offenses and the Penalties of Home Violence

▲Knowledge Picture
A person in his 20s who was arrested for assaulting his girlfriend and launched on probation has been sentenced to jail for stalking his girlfriend once more and threatening to distribute a intercourse video.

The Legal Division 1 of the Wonju Department of the Chuncheon District Courtroom sentenced 29-year-old A, who was arrested and charged with stalking his girlfriend of about 6 years by sending KakaoTalk messages 94 instances from 2:00 a.m. to 4:40 a.m. the final time. April Sentenced to 1 yr and 6 months.

He was additionally ordered to finish a 40-hour stalking and sexual assault therapy program and banned from working at organizations associated to youngsters, youth and disabilities for 3 years every.

Mr. A, who was arrested and charged on January 24 with confining his girlfriend and committing a violent act, was sentenced to 1 yr and 6 months in jail and three years of probation on March 27 and was launched from jail.

It was later revealed that he dedicated this crime after his girlfriend refused to satisfy him.

It was found that instantly after his launch from jail, he had made and cancelled eight reservations on the store the place his girlfriend works, regardless of the warning of the police officer who had referred to as 112 to not go to the sufferer.

In line with the prosecution, Mr A stated on the time: “What if the video stays and has been restored?” He made me go to the positioning and made repeated threats as if he needed to unfold the intercourse video, similar to ‘Come and delete it your self’, ‘For those who do not come I am going to unfold it all through the chat’, ‘I am going to simply pay the superb’.

The courtroom reprimanded him, saying: “The character of the crime may be very poor contemplating the circumstances and methodology of the crime, which included stalking the sufferer and forcing him to make use of earlier footage even after receiving a suspended sentence for the sufferer’s heavy imprisonment.”

He then defined the rationale for the sentence, saying: “Even making an allowance for the truth that the sufferer didn’t need to be punished, there’s the opportunity of guilt for having dedicated the crime on this case with out self-reflection in the course of the probationary interval, so the sentence was decided taking this into consideration.”

Each Mr A and the prosecutor appealed the primary occasion verdict.