Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Megan Thee Stallion Wins Defamation Lawsuit Against Blogger

Megan Thee Stallion Wins Defamation Lawsuit Against Blogger

December 2, 2025 Robert Mitchell - News Editor of Newsdirectory3.com News

“`html

Megan Thee stallion Wins Defamation Suit Against Blogger Milagro “Gramz” cooper

Table of Contents

  • Megan Thee stallion Wins Defamation Suit Against Blogger Milagro “Gramz” cooper
    • Verdict⁣ Details: Defamation, Emotional Distress, and Deepfake Promotion
    • Trial Recap: Closing Arguments and Jury Deliberations
    • Background: The Shooting‌ and⁢ Subsequent Online Fallout
    • Legal implications and the Definition of “Media”

A jury found ‍blogger Milagro “Gramz” Cooper liable for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional​ distress, ⁤and promoting a ‍deepfake ‌video related⁣ to the shooting of Megan Thee Stallion.

Published December⁤ 2,2023

What: Megan Thee ‌Stallion won a defamation ⁢lawsuit against‍ blogger Milagro “Gramz”‌ Cooper.
⁣‌
Where: Federal courthouse⁢ in Miami,‌ Florida.
​
When: Verdict reached on December 1, 2023,‌ after two days of⁣ jury deliberation.Why it matters: The case highlights the legal ‍ramifications of online defamation and the spread of misinformation, particularly concerning high-profile⁢ figures.
​
What’s next: Cooper is ⁣liable for $75,000 in‌ damages.

Verdict⁣ Details: Defamation, Emotional Distress, and Deepfake Promotion

On December 1, 2023, a jury ⁣in Miami found Milagro “Gramz” Cooper liable on three counts related to‍ her online conduct concerning Megan Thee Stallion and the​ 2020 shooting involving‌ Tory ⁣Lanez. The charges were defamation, intentional ​infliction of emotional distress, and promotion of⁣ an ‍altered sexual depiction – referring to a deepfake video. Legal reporter Meghann Cuniff first reported the verdict on Twitter.

The ​jury persistent‍ that cooper qualified as a member of the media, a key point of⁢ contention during the trial. ⁢Cuniff also reported that the ​jury provided “mixed answers to the media questions” before reaching their conclusions.

The total damages awarded‌ to Megan Thee Stallion were $75,000, including punitive ⁢damages. Cuniff detailed the breakdown of the damages.

Trial Recap: Closing Arguments and Jury Deliberations

Closing arguments in the case took place ⁣on ‍Wednesday,November 26,2023. Cooper’s attorney, ⁢Jeremy McLymont, argued⁢ that⁢ Cooper’s‍ online ⁤persona was a product of her upbringing, framing it as a performance rather than malicious intent. ⁤ Law & Crime provided live coverage of the trial.

Megan Thee Stallion’s ⁤lawyer, John O’sullivan, ‌emphasized Tory Lanez’s conviction ⁣for shooting Megan Thee‌ Stallion, linking Cooper’s actions to supporting Lanez’s narrative ​and further harming his client. Both ‌sides rested their cases on November 26th, handing the decision over to ​the jury.

Prior to reaching a verdict, the jury submitted multiple questions⁢ regarding specific exhibits ⁢presented during the trial, indicating careful‌ consideration of the evidence.

Background: The Shooting‌ and⁢ Subsequent Online Fallout

The lawsuit⁤ stems from ‌the July 12, 2020, shooting in Los Angeles,​ where Megan Thee Stallion‌ was injured.‍ Tory​ Lanez was later ⁣ convicted of shooting Megan Thee Stallion in December 2022.

Following ‌the shooting, Cooper, through her online platform, allegedly spread false and defamatory statements about Megan Thee Stallion, including promoting a deepfake video and coordinating with Lanez. These ⁤actions⁣ formed the basis of the defamation lawsuit.

The⁤ case ⁢underscores the challenges of combating online misinformation ⁤and the potential for‌ notable emotional and reputational harm​ caused by defamatory content.

Legal implications and the Definition of “Media”

A crucial aspect of the case revolved around whether ⁣Cooper qualified as a member of the “media.” The jury’s‍ affirmative answer on this point has broader ​implications for online content⁢ creators ‍and‌ the⁣ legal standards applied to their

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

news

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service