Metro Boomin Assault Trial September
# Metro Boomin Faces Explosive Sexual Assault Trial in 2025
The upcoming trial of Grammy-winning producer Metro Boomin (born Leland Wayne) promises to be one of the most closely watched legal battles in the music industry. Accused of sexual assault and battery by plaintiff Jane Doe, identified in court documents as LeMaistre, the case centers around allegations stemming from a 2016 encounter and its alleged reflection in his 2017 hit song, “Rap Saved Me.” With no settlement reached, the trial, slated for 2025, could significantly impact the career of the influential hip-hop producer.
## The Allegations: A Timeline of Events
LeMaistre’s lawsuit, filed in 2024, details a harrowing account beginning in the spring of 2016. She alleges she met Metro Boomin in Las Vegas while grieving the loss of her nine-month-old son. The two reportedly connected over a shared recognition for music as a means of emotional healing.
Months later, in September 2016, LeMaistre claims Metro invited her to his recording studio in California. According to her account, she consumed a shot of alcohol and half a Xanax before losing consciousness. Upon waking, she alleges she was paralyzed and unable to speak while Metro sexually assaulted her. She claims she later became pregnant consequently of the assault and terminated the pregnancy in November 2016.
## “Rap Saved Me” and the Lyrical Connection
A central point of contention in the case revolves around Metro Boomin’s 2017 track, “rap Saved Me,” featuring Offset, 21 Savage, and Quavo. The song’s chorus – “She took a Xanny, then she fainted… She drive me crazy, have my baby” – is cited in court filings as a disturbing lyrical allusion to the alleged assault.
LeMaistre’s legal team argues the lyrics demonstrate a callous acknowledgment of the incident. Metro Boomin, however, denies any connection between the song and the allegations, asserting he did not write or perform the verse in question. He vehemently rejects all accusations of wrongdoing.## Conflicting narratives: Consensual encounter or Calculated Scheme?
Metro Boomin’s defense team paints a drastically different picture of the events. They maintain the encounter was entirely consensual and accuse LeMaistre of fabricating the claims years later, allegedly after undergoing ayahuasca treatments.Attorney Lawrence Hinkle has characterized the lawsuit as a “pure shakedown,” claiming LeMaistre previously demanded money from Metro Boomin, which he refused to pay.
The defense further alleges LeMaistre is orchestrating a scheme to obtain millions of dollars through litigation, presenting evidence they claim supports this assertion. They argue her story is inconsistent and lacks credibility.
## The Plaintiff’s Response and the Road to Trial
LeMaistre’s attorney, Michael Willemin, strongly refutes the defense’s narrative.He accuses Metro Boomin’s legal team of employing tactics to delay discovery and obstruct the pursuit of justice. Willemin has vowed to present a comprehensive case to the jury, detailing the alleged assault and its devastating impact on his client.
The lack of a settlement agreement means the case will proceed to trial, promising a contentious and highly publicized legal battle. The proceedings are expected to draw notable attention from the music industry, legal experts, and the public alike.
## What’s at Stake?
The outcome of this trial could have profound consequences for both parties involved. For LeMaistre,it represents a pursuit of justice and accountability for a deeply traumatic experience. For Metro Boomin, a conviction could severely damage his reputation and career, possibly halting his ascent as one of hip-hop’s most influential producers.
The trial is poised to be a landmark case, raising significant questions about consent, power dynamics within the music industry, and the obligation of artists regarding their creative output. The industry and public will be watching closely as the truth unfolds in court.