Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Most Favored Nation, PBMs, & Patient Access: A Guide - News Directory 3

Most Favored Nation, PBMs, & Patient Access: A Guide

July 12, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
Original source: ajmc.com

States Take the Reins on PBM Reform Amid Federal Inaction

As frustration⁤ mounts over the lack of federal action, states ⁣are increasingly stepping in to regulate Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), aiming to⁣ curb practices that may prioritize profits over patient well-being.

The Growing State-Led reform Movement

The pharmaceutical landscape is a complex web, and at ‍its center frequently enough sits the Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM). Thes entities act as intermediaries between drug manufacturers, pharmacies, and health insurers, managing prescription drug benefits. ⁢However, a growing chorus of voices, including industry experts and state lawmakers, are raising concerns about the impact of PBM practices⁢ on ⁤drug costs and patient access.

“The states are getting so frustrated by lack of⁤ meaningful ⁢reform at a federal level⁢ that they’re basically taking matters into their own hands and trying to get something across the goal line for that subset of⁣ patients that they know ‍state‍ law will‍ impact,” explained a source familiar ⁣with the⁤ matter. This sentiment‍ underscores a significant trend: states ⁤are becoming the primary drivers of PBM⁣ reform.

Arkansas’s‍ Bold Move: Banning PBM Ownership‍ of Pharmacies

A recent example of this state-led initiative⁢ is a bill passed in Arkansas that ⁤prohibits pbms⁣ from ⁢owning pharmacies ‍within the⁤ state. This legislation ⁤directly addresses concerns‍ about vertical integration within the ⁣healthcare system.

Understanding⁣ Vertical Integration and Its Implications

Vertical integration occurs when a single entity controls ⁤multiple stages of the supply chain. In the context of healthcare, this can mean ⁤a health plan owning ⁢a PBM, which in turn‍ owns pharmacies. Critics ‍argue that this model creates inherent conflicts of interest.”What laws, ⁣like the Arkansas one, are trying to address is the vertical integration ‍where a health plan owns a PBM and ⁣pharmacies, and they can choose the ⁤drug a patient gets and where they fill their prescription with an eye more toward profits than patient outcomes,” noted an industry observer.

This arrangement can lead to PBMs steering patients towards pharmacies they own,perhaps⁤ limiting patient choice ⁢and influencing prescription fulfillment based on financial incentives rather than⁣ the ⁣best interests of the patient.

The “Rebates to Fees” Concern

The shift from manufacturer rebates to patient ‍fees is another area of concern. As one ⁤expert put it, “That, ⁤to me, isn’t⁤ good patient care, and I⁣ fear that yesterday’s rebates are today’s fees, ‍and tomorrow it’s going to be something else, and this ⁣vertically integrated model ⁤is going ⁤to continue to evolve to the detriment of patients.” This suggests a potential for ‍pbms to find new ways to⁤ generate revenue that may not align with improving patient affordability or outcomes.

Federal Efforts ⁢and the Path Forward

While states are actively pursuing reform, federal efforts to address PBM practices have also been a topic of‍ discussion. Past administrations have explored various models aimed ‍at reducing prescription drug costs. As an example, an executive order in 2020 sought to tie Medicare⁢ drug payments to international prices, a move intended to lower costs for American patients. Another initiative focused on ⁤a “Moast Favored Nation” drug ⁤price model, aiming to align U.S. prices with those in‍ other developed⁣ countries.However, the pace of federal ‍reform⁣ has been slow, leaving many states feeling compelled⁣ to act⁢ independently. The Arkansas law, and others like it,‍ represent a proactive ⁢approach by states to tackle issues they deem critical for their residents’ health and financial well-being. As this⁣ trend continues, it will be crucial to monitor the impact of‍ these state-level regulations on the broader pharmaceutical market and, most ⁣importantly, ⁣on patient care.

References

  1. bonavitacola J. Trump executive order could ⁢reduce pharmaceutical costs by 59%. AJMC®. March 12, 2025.⁤ Accessed July 11,⁤ 2025.⁢ https://www.ajmc.com/view/trump-executive-order-could-reduce-pharmaceutical-costs-by-59-
  2. Trump management announces prescription drug payment model to put American patients ⁤first. CMS.News release. November 20, 2020. Accessed July 11, 2025.‍[https://wwwcmsgov/[https://wwwcmsgov/

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

drug pricing policy, most favored nation, pharmacy benefit managers

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com