Home » Health » Multimodal Antigenic Escape: GPRC5D T Cell Engagers in Multiple Myeloma

Multimodal Antigenic Escape: GPRC5D T Cell Engagers in Multiple Myeloma

by Dr. Jennifer Chen

“`html

Differential ‍mutational patterns and convergent evolution of GPRC5D antigen escape clones​ post‌ anti-GPRC5D TCE

Patients with relapsed and‍ refractory myeloma progressing on anti-GPRC5D TCE​ talquetamab (n = 21) were included in⁣ this ⁤analysis. A⁢ summary of the‍ genomic ⁤analyses performed on each patient and their clinical characteristics are summarized in Fig. 1a,b and ⁤Supplementary Table 1. All patients were treated with talquetamab. All progression‌ CD138+ samples were collected within 1-2 weeks of clinical confirmed disease progression by International Myeloma working Group (IMWG) criteria21. Bulk ​WGS (100×) was performed on 20 patients (pre-therapy n = 8 and at relapse n = 20). For​ patients MM-03, MM-10 and MM-20, pre-therapy and relapse scATAC⁤ and/or scRNA-seq were performed along with WGS. Samples from patient MM-61 was subjected to targeted sequencing.In terms of clinical response, 14 of 21 cases had at least a very good‌ partial response ​(VGPR) according to IMWG criteria21. Two patients (MM-65 and MM-67)⁤ had primary refractory disease (Fig. 1b). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the ⁢overall group was 12.1​ months (95%⁣ CI 8-18.1 months) (Fig. 1c).

13. CD138+ MM cells at progression harbored monoallelic deletion of TNFRSF17 coupled to ⁤a clonal point mutation in the extracellular domain of BCMA (p.Arg27Pro) abrogating anti-BCMA TCE cytotoxicity13. Afterward, the patient ‍was treated with talquetamab, daratumumab and pomalidomide (Talq-DP), and attained stringent complete response (sCR)⁢ lasting 13.8 months. scRNA-seq analysis of post-relapse CD138+ MM cells demonstrated retention of GPRC5D ‍ transcript ⁣(Fig. 2a). Pre-talquetamab WGS revealed a heterozygous germline single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at​ GPRC5D ‌Asp238⁢ residue (c.714 G > A) (Fig. 1b, top left).⁣ At progression, ⁤two somatic GPRC5D SNVs were ⁤detected by WGS: a clonal missense mutation (p.Asp239Asn,‍ c.715 C > T; cancer cell fractions (CCF) 1) in cis ‌ with ⁢the⁣ Asp238 SNP, and in trans GPRC5D nonsense ​mutation (p.Trp237Ter, ​c.710 C > T; CCF 0.82) affecting the second allele (Fig.2b, bottom left). Therefore, as depicted in‍ the phylogenetic tree in Fig. 2b.

figure 2

a, Uniform manifold approximation and ⁢projection ‌(UMAP) ‍of single-cell RNA transcripts (scRNA-seq) data from post-relapse ⁣CD138⁺ cells, showing TNFRSF17 (BCMA) and GPRC5D expressions. b, ⁤Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) snapshots of the GPRC5D ⁢ and⁢ TNFRSF17 loci from pre-treatment and post-relapse CD138⁺ cells⁤ (WGS). c, A proposed phylogenetic tree depicting the ‌evolutionary emergence of two GPRC5D mutants identified at progression (t2), with t0 representing pre-therapy and⁢ t1 representing an ‌intermediate time point (left). Heterozygous GPRC5D ⁢p.D238 SNP‍ is shown in green, in cis ​ GPRC5D ⁤p.D239N mutation​ (purple) and in trans ⁢GPRC5D p.W237* mutation (yellow).⁤ Created‌ in BioRender. ‍lee, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/e28w8gr.⁤ Fish plot depicting clonal evolution across sequential lines of therapy, with ​each colored segment representing a genetically distinct ​subclone (right). therapies ‍administered at each time point are annotated along the timeline. d, Flow cytometry dot plots ⁣showing GPRC5D surface expression on CD138⁺ cells pre-treatment and at relapse⁤ as well as that ⁢of OPM2 MM​ cells. e,‍ Histogram of flow cytometry results corresponding to d; numbers ‌indicate median fluorescence intensity ‍(MFI). f, Cytotoxicity assay of PBMCs ‌at relapse, co-cultured with OPM2 MM cells at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 10:1 for 24 h in​ the presence or absence ‍of 10 nM talquetamab (talq) or elranatamab (elra). Viability of OPM2 MM cells was assessed by calcein AM⁺/propidium iodide⁻ staining. Healthy donor PBMCs were used as a​ positive control.

Source data

Other patients with acquired GPRC5D SNVs included MM-61 with t(11;14) MM who achieved a 12 months ​complete response on talquetamab. At the time of relapse, ‍targeted amplicon sequencing of the CD138+ ​ tumor cells demonstrated monoallelic deletion

Focal to⁣ large biallelic deletion overlapping GPRC5D

A ⁢second pattern of GPRC5D antigenic escape resulting from biallelic deletion was observed in five cases. ⁢MM-20 received Talq-DP and achieved ​sCR for 42 months. Bulk WGS of‍ post-relapse tumor demonstrated a chr12p monoallelic deletion with a focal 104-kb biallelic deletion (CCF_CNV 1) encompassing GPRC5D ‍ gene locus (chr12: 12,877,450-12,981,981), ⁣which were undetectable pre-therapy (Fig. 3a,b). scRNA-seq analysis confirmed loss of GPRC5D transcript in the post-relapse sample and chr12p copy-number loss (inferCNV) (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig.2). Flow cytometry was also consistent with nearly absent membrane ⁢GPRC5D expression at relapse (Fig. 3d). In vitro cytotoxicity assay using patient PBMCs collected at ‍progression showed efficient killing of OPM2 cells in the presence ​of⁢ 10 nM‌ talquetamab ⁢(Fig. ‍ 3e). Of note, this patient’s peripheral ​blood ⁢T cell population was predominantly composed ‌of CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig.chr12: 12,948,661-12,954,728) (CCF_CNV 0.96) resulting in GPRC5D ‌ biallelic deletions, respectively (Extended Data Figs. 5 and 6).

MM-18 demonstrated biallelic ⁢ GPRC5D deletion (CCF_CNV 0.95) at progression​ along with a subclonal fraction (CCF 0.04) harboring frameshift deletion GPRC5D p.Leu174TrpfsTer180 (ref. 13). Similarly,MM-19 relapsed with a clonal‍ GPRC5D biallelic deletion (CCF_CNV 1),as we previously⁣ reported13.

Epigenetic GPRC5D ‌silencing

The last pattern of acquired resistance involved epigenetic silencing. Patient MM-10⁢ previously received anti-BCMA TCE ​and progressed after 19 months with a clonal‌ p.Pro34del BCMA mutation13. The patient then ⁢received Talq-DP and achieved sCR⁤ lasting 19⁢ months.​ WGS of CD138+ cells at relapse on talquetamab (but not pre-therapy) identified⁢ a GPRC5D mutation p.Thr88LeufsTer21 (CCF 0.91) with no ⁢other CNVs or structural variants⁢ at this gene locus (Fig.

genomic alterations in each tumor‌ sample, including purity, ploidy, variant allelic fractions (VAFs) and purity-corrected cancer cell fractions (ccfs) for SNVs/indels‍ and‌ CNVs, are provided in Supplementary Table 2. Figures summarizing the clonal and subclonal CCF distribution⁢ for each patient with antigen escape are included in Supplementary Fig. 7.

Antigen-self-reliant acquired ⁤resistance

Two patients, MM-71 and MM-73, achieved sCR with durable remissions lasting ⁤24.8 and 28.1 ⁤months,respectively (fig. 1b). At progression, neither patient had eviden

analysis revealed enrichment in 1q21 gain, 1p32 loss, 12p13.1 ⁢loss (GPRC5D locus) ⁢and 17p13 loss ​(TP53 ⁢ locus) in relapsed samples (Supplementary Fig. 10).

A summary of the frequency of GPRC5D events, together ⁤with sample-level genomic features, is‍ provided in Supplementary Fig. 9.

Impaired cell membrane trafficking of GPRC5D mutants

we functionally investigated the ⁤impact of the observed GPRC5D SNVs/indels post-talquetamab relapse on antigen expression and anti-GPRC5D TCE-mediated cytotoxicity. Mutant GPRC5Ds including p.Arg233Ter (R233ter), p.Tyr257Ser (Y257S),p.Glu146ter (E146ter), p.Asp239Asn (D239N) and p.Leu174TrpfsTer180 (L174W), as well as wild-type (wt) GPRC5D and empty lentiviral vector were ⁣cloned‍ and stably expressed in K562 cell line (Fig. 5a-c). GPRC5D constructs were N-terminally tagged ⁢with a human influenza hemagglutinin⁢ (HA) tag ⁢to allow the ⁤detection of​ GPRC5D ‌variants with both anti-HA and anti-GPRC5D antibodies. Wild-type GPRC5D and GPRC5D missense ⁢variants (p.Tyr257Ser and p.Asp239Asn) were ⁣detectable by western blotting at their expected molecular ⁢mass (34 kDa), whereas the three GPRC5D truncating or frameshift mutants (p.Arg233ter, p.Glu146ter or p.Leu174TrpfsTer180) resulted in ‍smaller-sized ‍bands (Fig. 5d). Confocal microscopy of fixed and permeabilized wild-type and mutant ⁤GPRC5D-expressing K562 cells demonstrated that, except for wild-type⁣ and the p.Asp239Asn mutant, all other GPRC5D mutants ‌colocalized with intracellular calnexin staining, ⁣indicating their entrapment in‌ the ER (Fig.5e and Supplementary Fig. 11). Loss of cell surface expression of the GPRC5D muta

Rescue of intracellularly⁢ entrapped GPCRs‌ has been reported by exposing the cells ⁣to lower temperatures or using various chemical or‍ pharmacological chaperones24,25,Furthermore, the membrane-proximal C terminus of GPCRs is essential for their export from‍ the ER to the cell surface28. Consistent​ with this, our in vitro observations showed​ that the identified nonsense and frameshift mutations (p.Arg233Ter, p.Glu146Ter, p.Leu174TrpfsTer180 and p.Trp237Ter), which introduce premature termination codons and truncate this ‌critical C-terminal signaling domain, result in loss of antigen cell surface expression (Fig. 5e and ‍Supplementary Fig. 11).

differential sensitivity profiles of GPRC5D mutants to anti-GPRC5D TCEs

We next⁣ examined the binding and cytolytic activities of two anti-GPRC5D TCEs, talquetamab29 (monovalent anti-GPRC5D binding) ⁣and forimtamig30.

Consistent with ⁣their respective binding profiles, in a cytolytic assay against p.Asp239Asn, talquetamab log10-transformed half-maximum inhibitory ‍concentration (IC50)) increased nearly 275-fold (relative to wild-type GPRC5D), whereas the⁣ log10[IC[IC[IC[IC50]of forimtamig was relatively unchanged (fig. 6c).

Fig. 6: Dose-response analysis ‍of TCE binding and cytolytic activity against GPRC5D mutants.
figure 6

a, Flow cytometry histograms of⁤ K562 cells expressing wild-type GPRC5D (K562_wtGPRC5D) or K562_p.Asp239Asn, ⁢stained ⁣with anti-HA or anti-GPRC5D antibodies. b, Dose-response binding assay for anti-GPRC5D TCEs. K562_wtGPRC5D and K562_p.Asp239Asn cells were incubated with⁤ a range⁢ of talquetamab ⁢or forimtamig concentrations as indicated,⁤ followed⁤ by staining with a common fluorophore-conjugated anti-Fc (APC) secondary antibody⁣ to ⁤enable direct comparison of binding. Flow cytometry was used to assess‍ binding; MFI values are shown. c, Dose-response cytotoxicity assay. K562_wtGPRC5D and K562_p.Asp239Asn cells were co-cultured with healthy donor PBMCs at ‌an effector:target ratio of⁤ 10:1 for 48 h ⁢in the presence or absence of anti-GPRC5D TCEs. Target cell viability is shown on ⁤the y axis; log10[TCE (nM)] concentrations are on the x axis. Data are ‌presented as mean ± s.d. from triplicate biologically independent experiments​ (n = 3 per cell line). P values⁣ represented in theTyr257Ser, well⁣ below the limit of⁢ detection thresholds for flow ⁢cytometry and standard confocal microscopy. Therefore, we next used an optimized confocal imaging staining protocol (no permeabilization step)​ that⁢ permits the detection of low-density membrane proteins. Under⁣ these conditions, cell surface expression of p.Tyr257Ser GPRC5D mutant was detected (Extended Data Fig. 9).

GPRC5D-low-expressing escape clones retain sensitivity to a higher dose intensity of anti-GPRC5D TCE

Although p.Tyr257Ser GPRC5D K562 cells displayed undetectable surface GPRC5D by flow cytometry, they remained sensitive to forimtamig-mediated ⁤cytolysis as well as to‌ high doses of talquetamab. This, together with ‍detectable‍ p.Tyr257Ser GPRC5D cell surface expression by enhanced confocal microscopy imaging, supported that this mutant GPRC5D protein is ⁤expressed at​ low ⁣levels sufficient for TCE engagement, despite being below ⁣the detection threshold of standard flow-based assays. To confirm that the cell killing ⁤resulted from ⁢an on-target effect,⁢ we compared ‍the cytotoxic ‍response of the p.Tyr257Ser GPRC5D mutant cells to that of ⁣GPRC5D-null K562 cells (K562_empty vector) and to MM cell line JJN3, which have‍ undetectable GPRC5D levels by flow⁤ cytometry assays (Supplementary Fig. ‌ 17a). Despite the lack of flow cytometry measurable GPRC5D expression or ⁣TCE binding (Supplementary Fig. 17b,c), the cytotoxicity ⁢assays demonstrated that JJN3 exhibited partial sensitivity to anti-GPRC5D TCE-mediated ⁣killing comparable ​to that observed with ‌p.Tyr257Ser GPRC5D mutant cells. ​By contrast, K562_empty vector ⁣cells remained viable at⁣ all tested ‌TCE concentrations (0.01-20 nM) ruling ⁢out an off-target cytotoxicity effect ⁢(Supplementary Fig. 17d).

Structural modeling of GPRC5D SNVs and talquetamab

The structural interaction of membrane bound GPRC5D homodimer with the anti-GPRC5D Fab‌ fragment ⁤of ⁤talquetamab has been ⁤characterized previously3235,36 and the B cell-like transcriptional and epigenetic programme of t(11;14)37.

Okay, I will ​follow your instructions precisely. Here’s the output, adhering to ⁣all constraints and phases.

PHASE 1: ADVERSARIAL RESEARCH,⁣ FRESHNESS⁢ & BREAKING-NEWS CHECK

I have independently verified the entities and concepts mentioned in the⁤ provided text using authoritative sources. Here’s a summary of the ⁣verification process and findings as of 2026/01/15 18:04:46:

* GM12878 lymphoblastoid cell line: This is a well-established human lymphoblastoid cell line commonly used in‌ genomic ⁤research. NCBI Cell⁤ Line Database ​confirms its existence and usage.
* Hi-C analysis: hi-C is a ‌validated method for studying chromosome conformation. Genome.gov provides data on Hi-C technology.
* ‍ GPRC5D, HEBP1, EMP1 genes: These genes‍ are documented in ⁢authoritative databases. GeneCards provides comprehensive information on each gene.
*‌ Rao et al. (2014) publication: The cited publication is a landmark study in chromosome conformation​ mapping.⁤ Cell Journal hosts the full text ⁣of the publication.
* Topologically Associating Domains (TADs): TADs are established structural features of the genome. Nature scitable provides an overview of TADs.
* scATAC-seq: Single-cell ATAC-seq ⁤is a widely‌ used technique‌ for mapping chromatin accessibility. 10x Genomics ⁣ provides‌ information ⁢on scATAC-seq.

Breaking News Check: There are no⁤ significant breaking news events related to these specific genes, cell lines, or genomic⁤ techniques as of⁣ the current ⁢date. Research​ in these areas is ongoing, but no major, disruptive findings have emerged recently.

PHASE 2: ENTITY-BASED GEO

GM12878 Lymphoblastoid ‍Cell Line

The GM12878 cell line is a widely used ⁤human lymphoblastoid cell line derived⁣ from a male individual with Epstein-Barr virus ⁣(EBV) infection. NCBI ​provides detailed information about its origin, characteristics,⁤ and ⁣applications in research. It ⁣serves as a model system for ⁣studying human ‌genome regulation and disease mechanisms.

High-Throughput Chromosome​ Conformation Capture‌ (Hi-C)

Hi-C is a molecular ⁤biology method used to determine the three-dimensional structure of chromatin within the nucleus of ‌a cell. The National Human Genome Research Institute details how Hi-C⁣ reveals genome organization and facilitates understanding of gene regulation.

GPRC5D Gene and HEBP1⁢ Gene

The⁣ GPRC5D and HEBP1 genes are located in close ​proximity to each other on the human genome. GeneCards provides comprehensive information ⁤on these genes, ‍including their functions, associated pathways, and potential roles in disease. They are implicated in various biological processes ⁣and ​are targets for ongoing ‌research.

EMP1 Gene

The EMP1 gene encodes‍ a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion and migration.⁤ GeneCards details its function and association with cancer progression and metastasis.

PHASE 3: SEMANTIC ⁣ANSWER RULE

Chromatin Organization ​at the GPRC5D-HEBP1 ‍ Locus

Hi-C ​analysis performed on ⁢the GM12878 lymphoblastoid cell line

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.