Nonfiction Core App 3.1 Update: GenAI & Resources
- The Nonfiction Core Application, a template designed to ease the application process for filmmakers, has been updated to address the growing use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in...
- Nonfiction Core application 3.1 includes five optional questions about GenAI, along with links to resources for further learning.
- The updated application includes questions in sections where artistic approach, ethical duty, and production practices intersect.
Nonfiction Core Application Updated to Address AI Use in Filmmaking
Updated June 14, 2025
The Nonfiction Core Application, a template designed to ease the application process for filmmakers, has been updated to address the growing use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in documentary filmmaking. The update, a collaborative effort between the International Documentary association (IDA), the Archival Producers Alliance (APA), Google’s Artists + machine Intelligence (AMI) team, and the Sundance Institute Artist Accelerator Program, integrates new questions focused on GenAI use.
Nonfiction Core application 3.1 includes five optional questions about GenAI, along with links to resources for further learning. These additions are informed by a community survey in March that explored how documentary producers and directors are using GenAI, their concerns, and their approaches to disclosing GenAI use to funders and audiences. The survey, which had 146 respondents, indicated a cautious but curious field. while 25% of respondents do not plan to use GenAI, others are motivated by its potential to improve workflow efficiency (25%) and expand creative abilities (21%).
The updated application includes questions in sections where artistic approach, ethical duty, and production practices intersect.
“If you plan to use generative AI to realize any part of your artistic vision, describe how.”
This question encourages filmmakers to explain their GenAI use, promoting transparency between artists and funders and fostering a shared understanding of how these tools can shape a project’s narrative and aesthetics.
“if you are using generative AI, describe what ethical considerations or practices of accountability you are employing. [This can include workflow/tracking/legal review of AI-generated materials; transparency with your participants (if applicable), assessing algorithmic bias; consideration of possible impact on the historical record; copyright issues; and assessment of the AI tools or technologies you are choosing].”
This question prompts reflection on GenAI’s ethical implications, encouraging responsible storytelling and ensuring participants can respond with agency to the tools shaping the narrative.
“If you are using generative AI as part of your artistic approach, how do you plan to disclose it to your audience? If you don’t plan to disclose the use of AI, please explain why.”
This question addresses how GenAI use will be disclosed to audiences, promoting viewer trust and a deeper understanding of the filmmaker’s intent.
“Please provide a budget, from development through release, in U.S. dollars, including a budget total. Please ensure that any accessibility, safety, generative AI and duty of care costs mentioned in your above responses are reflected in the submitted budget.”
This addition ensures that costs associated with GenAI use, such as licensing and ethical review, are included in the budget.
“What should reviewers be looking for in your sample? Explain what is present and absent in the sample, and how it will differ as a finished film. Describe how it is representative of the intended story, style, subject, or other aspect of the project. If your sample includes any audio, visual, or text elements generated with AI, please describe how and what tools or technologies you used. We encourage applicants not to spend extra resources creating a sample for each individual fund. If your current sample is outside of the suggested length requirements, please provide reviewers with the time codes of the portion of the sample that best reflects your intended style and approach (e.g., 3:15-12:15).”
This encourages applicants to contextualize GenAI usage in visual materials, fostering understanding and building a shared vocabulary around creative techniques.
what’s next
Alongside the application updates, resources are available to support understanding and ethical adoption of GenAI tools. The APA has published a Best Practices Guide for use of GenAI in Documentary, and also a companion Tool Kit. Sundance Collab will host “Navigating AI in Filmmaking” and IDA’s Documentary Magazine features a regular column,“The Synthesis”,that explores the evolving role of AI in nonfiction media.
