Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
"Not VANCE's speech was dangerous, but the European reactions on it," says German media CEO Döpfner - News Directory 3

“Not VANCE’s speech was dangerous, but the European reactions on it,” says German media CEO Döpfner

February 20, 2025 Catherine Williams World
News Context
At a glance
  • In a recent podcast, influential German publisher and billionaire Mathias Döpfner defended the controversial speech by American Vice President JD Vance, delivered at the annual Munich Security Conference.
  • Vance's speech, delivered just over a week before the German elections, sparked widespread criticism in Germany and across Europe.
  • Döpfner expressed his disapproval of the European reception of Vance's speech in The Rachman Review podcast, hosted by Gideon Rachman, a foreign columnist for the Financial Times.
Original source: nrc.nl

The Controversial Speech and Its Aftermath: Mathias Döpfner on JD Vance’s Comments

In a recent podcast, influential German publisher and billionaire Mathias Döpfner defended the controversial speech by American Vice President JD Vance, delivered at the annual Munich Security Conference. Döpfner, CEO and co-owner of Axel Springer, which includes the American Politico and German newspapers The World and Bild, described the speech as “an inspiring message.” He criticized the European reactions to the speech as “unstrategic and even dangerous.”

Vance’s speech, delivered just over a week before the German elections, sparked widespread criticism in Germany and across Europe. In his remarks, Vance questioned the democratic content of European institutions, the lack of freedom of the press, and the exclusion of populist parties in Europe. He also suggested that internal dangers such as mass immigration posed a greater threat to Europe than external threats from Russia or China.

Döpfner’s Critique of European Reactions

Döpfner expressed his disapproval of the European reception of Vance’s speech in The Rachman Review podcast, hosted by Gideon Rachman, a foreign columnist for the Financial Times. He emphasized the importance of a transatlantic security alliance and trade relationship, calling it “particularly inappropriate” to always react bitterly to the Trump administration and advocate for European isolationism.

Döpfner, known for his conservative stance in German public debate, has long advocated for a transatlantic free trade zone. In his 2023 book, The Trade Trap, he argued for closer economic ties between the U.S. and Europe. He believes that Vance’s speech was deliberately misunderstood and that Europe needs to engage more constructively with political movements and voters who fundamentally disagree with mainstream views.

“We must talk about how we deal with political movements, parties, and voters with whom we fundamentally disagree. I find it inspiring when a foreign politician asks whether it is smart to give twenty percent of voters the message that they will not be heard.”

Mathias Döpfner

Döpfner also acknowledged the personal and political complexities surrounding the AfD, a far-right party in Germany. While he personally believes it would be a mistake to consider the AfD a normal political movement and form a coalition with it, he argues that excluding the party outright would only make it stronger.

No More Shared Values?

Gideon Rachman, the interviewer, wrote a critical column about the “deep hypocrisy” in Vance’s words, suggesting that the U.S. can no longer be considered a reliable ally of Europeans. In the podcast, Döpfner agreed that the transatlantic relationship is in danger but argued that this issue predates the current administration, citing the era of Angela Merkel and Barack Obama.

Döpfner is a vocal admirer of American tech entrepreneurs. In 2022, he encouraged Elon Musk to buy Twitter, stating that it would be “a contribution to democracy.” As the owner of Politico, Döpfner has occasionally intervened in American politics. In 2020, an email leaked in which he urged his top managers to pray for a Trump victory. Initially denying the email’s existence, he later described it as “ironic” and a “provocation in a group of people who hate Trump.”

Recent Developments and Implications

The controversy surrounding Vance’s speech highlights the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Europe, particularly regarding issues of democracy, immigration, and political inclusion. As the world grapples with these challenges, the need for constructive dialogue and mutual understanding becomes ever more pressing.

In the context of U.S. politics, the debate over immigration and the rise of populist movements resonate deeply. For instance, the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections in the U.S. saw a significant shift in political discourse, with candidates like Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders gaining traction by addressing issues of immigration and economic inequality. These developments underscore the importance of engaging with diverse political views, as Döpfner advocates.

Moreover, the transatlantic relationship remains a cornerstone of global stability. The U.S. and Europe share a long history of cooperation, from World War II to the Cold War and beyond. Recent geopolitical shifts, such as the rise of China and Russia, have only reinforced the need for a strong transatlantic alliance. However, as Döpfner points out, the relationship is not without its challenges, and both sides must work to bridge their differences.

Looking ahead, the U.S. and Europe must navigate a complex geopolitical landscape. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the rise of authoritarian regimes, and the challenges of climate change all demand a united front. As Döpfner argues, the transatlantic relationship is stronger than any individual government or leader, and it is crucial to maintain open lines of communication and cooperation.

Counterarguments and Criticisms

Critics of Döpfner’s views might argue that his support for Vance’s speech is misguided, given the controversial nature of Vance’s remarks. They may also point to the potential risks of engaging with far-right political movements, which could further polarize societies. However, Döpfner’s perspective offers a valuable counterpoint, emphasizing the need for constructive dialogue and the dangers of exclusion.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding JD Vance’s speech and Mathias Döpfner’s defense of it highlight the complexities of transatlantic relations and the need for open dialogue. As the world continues to grapple with political and economic challenges, the U.S. and Europe must work together to build a more stable and inclusive future.

For more insights and analysis, stay tuned to NewsDirectory3.com.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service