Notre Dame Anger Index: Why They Deserve Doubt
- This article,dated November 26,2025,focuses on the College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings and specifically criticizes the committee's treatment of Group of 5 teams,using Tulane as a prime example.
- * Tulane's Stagnant Ranking: Despite wins by teams ranked above them, Tulane remains stuck at No.
- In essence, the article is a critique of the perceived bias within the CFP ranking system and a plea for fairer consideration of Group of 5 teams.
Miami in 2025: A Commentary on College Football Playoff Rankings & Group of 5 Portrayal
This article,dated November 26,2025,focuses on the College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings and specifically criticizes the committee’s treatment of Group of 5 teams,using Tulane as a prime example. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
* Tulane’s Stagnant Ranking: Despite wins by teams ranked above them, Tulane remains stuck at No. 24 in the CFP rankings. The author argues this feels like a designated spot for a Group of 5 team, a “junk drawer” for teams the committee doesn’t fully value.
* The Importance of Conference Championship: The author acknowledges that winning the American conference is crucial for Tulane’s playoff hopes. However, they argue simply making the playoff isn’t enough.
* Questionable Ranking Logic: Teams that jumped Tulane in the rankings (Arizona State, Pitt, SMU, Georgia Tech) have similar or arguably weaker résumés. The author questions the rationale for ranking these Power Conference teams ahead of Tulane.
* Potential Playoff Implications: The difference between the No. 11 and No. 12 seed could mean the difference between playing a playoff game in the SEC or Big 12, a meaningful disadvantage.
* Bias Against Group of 5: The core argument is that the CFP committee consistently undervalues Group of 5 teams, judging them based on conference affiliation rather than their actual performance and strength of schedule.
* Call for Merit-Based Ranking: The author concludes by stating that teams like Tulane,James Madison,Navy,North Texas,and San Diego State deserve to be evaluated solely on their merits,not their conference status.
In essence, the article is a critique of the perceived bias within the CFP ranking system and a plea for fairer consideration of Group of 5 teams. It highlights the challenges these teams face in breaking into the playoff despite strong seasons. The article is written from a perspective that believes Tulane (and other G5 teams) are being unfairly overlooked.