|Notre Dame CFP Sacked: The Real Reasons You Missed

Okay, here’s a breakdown of the main points and ⁣arguments presented in the text,⁣ focusing on ⁢the author’s perspective regarding the College football Playoff (CFP) ‍selection committee’s decision:

Core Argument: Notre Dame was unfairly excluded from ⁤the College Football ‍Playoff.

the author strongly believes Notre dame deserved a spot⁣ in the‍ CFP⁢ and is critical of the committee’s reasoning for excluding⁣ them. ⁢They see a clear bias or flawed logic in the committee’s ⁣decision-making.

Key ‍Points ‍& ⁣Supporting⁢ Arguments:

* Notre‍ Dame’s Resume: ⁣The author highlights Notre Dame’s strong record (10-2), close losses ‍to highly-ranked teams (Texas‍ A&M and Miami by a combined 4 points), and⁢ dominant wins in their final 10 games (average margin of ‍30⁢ points, including wins over three 9-win teams).
* comparison⁣ to Alabama: The ⁤author directly compares Notre Dame’s record to Alabama’s (also⁢ 10-2,⁢ but with a ⁤significant loss in the ‍SEC Championship). ⁢They point out that no three-loss team had ever made⁣ the CFP before this year, ⁢and question why Alabama was given a pass for playing an extra game (due to being an self-reliant).
* Comparison to‍ Miami: The author also draws comparisons to Miami (10-2), noting the committee’s seemingly arbitrary shift in rankings. They criticize the committee for creating a “needless debate”⁤ between Miami⁣ and notre ⁣dame.
* Strength of Schedule Argument Debunked: The author acknowledges the committee’s‍ claim that Alabama had a tougher schedule (11th ranked) than Notre Dame (42nd) and miami (44th), but argues that Notre Dame’s wins were more extraordinary given⁣ the schedule they did play.
* Committee’s ‍Inconsistency: The author emphasizes the committee’s inconsistency,first ⁣refusing to drop Alabama after a ⁢decisive loss,and then inexplicably⁢ moving Miami ahead of Notre Dame.
* Notre Dame’s Financial Impact: The author briefly notes Notre ‍Dame’s financial influence on college football (through TV‍ deals and ticket sales) as a point of irony,‍ suggesting that despite their value to the sport, they were still⁤ overlooked.
* NBC Deal: The⁤ author mentions the long-standing and ‍lucrative TV deal ⁢with NBC as further evidence of Notre Dame’s ‍importance.

Author’s Tone:

The⁤ author is clearly frustrated and critical of ⁤the CFP selection committee. The tone is argumentative,⁢ and they use phrases like “defied logic,” “needless⁢ debate,” and “unfairly” to ⁢convey their disapproval. They are passionate⁤ about defending notre Dame’s case for inclusion.

In essence, the⁢ article is a passionate defense of Notre Dame’s CFP credentials and a scathing critique of ⁤the selection committee’s decision-making process.