NRL: Clubs Object to Zac Lomax Storm Move – News & Updates
Melbourne Storm have come under heavy fire from rival clubs over their pursuit of Zac Lomax.
One club boss even declared at wednesday’s chief executives’ conference that Lomax’s decision to quit Parramatta was no different to when Sonny Bill Williams walked out on the Bulldogs.
It came to a head when Storm chief executive Justin Rodski faced significant backlash as he tried to make a case why Lomax should be allowed to join his third club in as many years.
WHAT’S GAMBLING REALLY COSTING YOU? Set a deposit limit. For Free and confidential support call 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au.
The only place to stream every match of the 2025/26 KFC BBL LIVE is on FOX CRICKET, available on Kayo Sports.| new to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1.
I’m told rival club bosses in attendance were unanimous that the NRL must back the Eels and not allow Lomax to join the Storm in 2026 unless it is done with Parramatta’s full blessing.
South Sydney’s Blake Solly made a particularly good point when he likened Lomax’s decision to quit Parramatta with three years remaining on his contract to when SBW controversially exited Canterbury in 2008.Let’s remember Sonny Bill was out of the game for five years before he returned with the Roosters in 2013.
Gorden Tallis was another player who had to sit out a season during the Super League War when he left St George for the Broncos.
but now there are calls to let Lomax back immediately, regardless of if the Eels oppose it, just because the rebel rugby comp R360 fell over.
It absolutely stinks.
No one is saying lomax should
MORE NRL NEWS
EVERY CLUB’S BEST 17: Broncos halves call leaves casualty; Roosters DCE dilemma
‘HIT ME BETWEEN EYES’: Legend reveals mental health battle that forced rehab stint
BEST 25 UNDER 25: Scary Walsh truth laid bare as Galvin reality revealed
Otherwise, it could end up in legal stoush some want to suggest could be a restraint of trade.
This is where the clubs want the NRL to back Parra to the hilt if that eventuates.
what also makes the case against letting Lomax back immediately even stronger was comments from R360 boss Mike Tindall this week.
Tindall was quoted in The Australian saying R360 “didn’t target anyone”.
“NRL players and their agents approached us,” Tindall said.
“We didn’t go after them. We’re a rugby union competition.”
If what Tindall says is true, it suggests this was either masterminded by Lomax _ or his agent _ who approached R360, knowing Lomax still had three years to run on his existing Parramatta deal.
Taking that into account, I can’t believe the game is even considering letting him back in 2026.
Surely Lomax needs to take accountability for his actions, or he should take it up with his agent Clinton Schifcofske.
National Rugby League (NRL) Six-Again Rule
Table of Contents
The NRL’s six-again rule, introduced in 2020, was initially intended to reduce wrestling tactics and increase the flow of the game, but its implementation has become controversial due to inconsistent officiating.
The six-again rule grants an immediate restart of the tackle count if a team commits an infraction inside their own 40-meter zone, primarily focusing on infringements like slowing the play-the-ball or offside positioning. This differs from a standard penalty, which awards the attacking team field position and a set of six tackles.
in 2020, the NRL reported a 32% decrease in wrestle-related penalties following the introduction of the six-again rule. NRL.com – Six-Again Rule Working
Impact of the Six-Again Rule on Game Outcomes
The six-again rule has been criticized for its subjective interpretation by referees, leading to potentially game-changing calls. the inconsistency in applying the rule can create frustration for players and fans alike, as momentum can shift rapidly based on referee decisions.
A study by The Conversation in 2020 highlighted concerns about the rule’s ambiguity and the potential for it to unfairly influence game results. The article noted that the rule’s effectiveness relies heavily on consistent and accurate refereeing.
Such as, during the 2023 NRL season, several games saw significant swings in momentum due to controversial six-again calls, sparking debate among commentators and fans. Fox Sports – NRL six-Again Controversy
Proposed Rule Changes and Trials
The NRL is currently considering modifications to the six-again rule to address concerns about its impact on game fairness. Potential changes include stricter guidelines for referees and a review of the types of infringements that warrant a six-again restart.
In November 2023, the NRL announced trials of a new rule variation for the 2024 pre-season, aiming to reduce the frequency of six-again restarts and provide greater clarity for referees. NRL.com – Six-Again Rule Changes Trial
Specifically, the trial rule involves limiting six-again restarts to only penalizable offenses, rather than discretionary calls, and potentially reducing the area where six-again restarts can be awarded. The results of these trials will be evaluated before any permanent changes are implemented.
Raiders’ Defensive Performance
The initial statement references the Raiders’ defensive performance in a specific game, but does not provide details. Without further data, it is indeed impossible to verify or expand upon this claim.
The Canberra Raiders finished the 2023 NRL season ranked 12th in points conceded, allowing an average of 22.8 points per game. NRL.com – Canberra Raiders Stats