The blossoming romance between Lithuanian fighter Dominykas Dirkstys and makeup artist/singer Oksana Pikul has quickly become a public conversation, escalating beyond Valentine’s Day declarations of affection into a series of online exchanges involving family members and fellow personalities. The latest development sees Dirkstys responding to commentary on the relationship with a pointed, and uncensored, message directed at journalist Fausta Marija Leščiauskaitė.
The initial announcement of the relationship, confirmed by Pikul and marked by a suggestive photoshoot, sparked debate primarily focused on the age difference between the two – Dirkstys is 24, while Pikul is 42. This dynamic has become a recurring theme in the public discussion, and seemingly prompted Dirkstys’s recent online activity. According to reporting from Delfi.lt, Dirkstys shared an article about the ongoing discussion surrounding his relationship with Pikul, adding a direct and expletive-laden comment aimed at Leščiauskaitė: “Kam įdomu, ką kažkokia p***a galvoja?” (“Who cares what some bitch thinks?”).
This response follows Leščiauskaitė’s commentary on Dirkstys’s previous online behavior, specifically his use of similar language towards another public figure, Naglis Bierancas. Pikul herself also weighed in on the situation, offering a broader defense of her relationship and a critique of the public’s reaction. According to reporting from 15min.lt, Pikul expressed a feeling that others were seeking to find fault in her choices, stating, “Atrodo, kad visi aplink ieško manyje gėdos jausmo. Bet aš jo neturiu. Gal jis išoperuotas?” (“It seems like everyone around is looking for a feeling of shame in me. But I don’t have it. Maybe it was surgically removed?”).
Pikul continued, emphasizing her independence and lack of regret over past decisions, including her divorce and her work providing for her son. She also addressed the focus on her age, stating, “Man – negėda.” (“I am not ashamed.”). She then shifted the focus to what she perceives as an unnecessary intrusion of others into their relationship, suggesting that men involved should resolve any issues privately. “Tai jų reikalai. Palikime juos ramybėje,” (“Those are their affairs. Let’s leave them in peace.”) she stated.
Pikul also called for solidarity among women, arguing that they should support each other rather than engage in criticism or attempts to diminish one another. She dismissed the controversy as a manufactured drama, accusing others of seeking attention by exaggerating the situation. “Tai pigus triukas, bandymas įšokti į traukinį – išpūsti milžinišką problemą ten, kur jos nėra,” (“This is a cheap trick, an attempt to jump on the bandwagon – to blow a huge problem out of proportion where there isn’t one,”) she stated. She further suggested that the public’s fascination with their personal lives is driven by a desire for “klikų” (clicks), and urged others to focus on more pressing issues, such as fathers abandoning their families.
The exchange highlights the intense public scrutiny surrounding the relationship, which began with a Valentine’s Day announcement and a provocative photoshoot. The age gap remains a central point of discussion, but the recent online activity suggests a growing frustration from both Pikul and Dirkstys with the level of commentary and judgment directed towards their personal lives. Dirkstys is currently preparing for a fight, with his mother offering him support, as revealed in a separate social media post, adding another layer to the unfolding narrative. The situation continues to develop, and it remains to be seen whether the couple will continue to engage with the public discourse or attempt to distance themselves from the ongoing attention.
