Outrage Erupts as Ke Wenze Returns to Custody: Wang Shijian’s Fiery ‘7414!’ Outburst Sparks Controversy
Ke Wenzhe Returns to Detention Court Amid Controversy
Reported by Real Time Center/Pan Boating
People’s Party Chairman Ke Wenzhe was ordered to return without bail by the North’s court, and the North’s Prosecutor’s Office objected. The High Court concluded that Ke Wenzhe had “actively interfered in the case of Jinghua City” and lacked necessary knowledge, forcing him to return to the detention court for further judgment.
DPP legislator Wang Shijian criticized Ke Wenzhe on Facebook, stating that the land in Jinghua City was originally an industrial zone and was converted into a commercial zone with strict legal regulations. Wang Shijian emphasized that Ke Wenzhe, as the first mayor, was strongly opposed to the expansion of Jinghua City while his urban development director was Lin Zhumin, an American scholar known for his professionalism and ethics.
Wang Shijian highlighted that Ke Wenzhe’s “return without guarantee” does not imply innocence and that the trial has only just begun. He also criticized Ke Wenzhe for claiming to have an IQ of 157 and comparing himself to Emperor Yongzheng, yet suddenly becoming “I know nothing” to face the judiciary.
Wang Shijian quoted Ke Wenzhe’s past words, saying, ”If the mayor can use his lack of skills to take profits or bribes from the consortium without incurring any legal or moral responsibility, then being an AI mayor would not be bad.” He concluded by saying, “Quoting the words of the past Ke Wenzhe and sending them to the present Ke Wenzhe – 7414!!”
Ke Wenzhe’s trial began at 2 pm, and the outcome is yet to be determined.
Related News
- Detention will be presented in the court in the afternoon! Kay Wenze replied “under arrest” and needed to be temporarily detained in the waiting room
- At 2 o’clock in the afternoon, who will appear in the detention court of Wenger! Wu Jingyi shouted: Stop manipulating populism
- Kay Wenze Reopens Detention Court Legal circles reveal mystery of High Court ruling: Detention is too likely.