Parada w Moskwie. Trump pozbawił się wpływu na Ukrainę – Rzeczpospolita

Donald Trump announced a three-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine on May 9, 2026. Governments in both Kyiv and Moscow have confirmed the agreement to halt hostilities for the specified duration.

The announcement coincides with the annual military parade in Moscow, an event traditionally held on May 9 to commemorate the end of World War II in Europe. The timing of the truce aligns with the Russian capital’s high-profile celebrations.

President Volodymyr Zelensky provided an immediate reaction to the ceasefire announcement. While the specific terms of the three-day pause have not been fully detailed, the confirmation from the Ukrainian government indicates a temporary cessation of active combat operations.

International and Diplomatic Reactions

Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former United States National Security Advisor, characterized the agreement not as a concession, but as a strategic gesture. Brzezinski described the truce as a show of goodwill from the Ukrainian side.

The Kremlin has also issued a formal comment regarding the announcement. The Russian government’s confirmation of the three-day window suggests a mutual agreement to observe the pause, though the Kremlin’s statement did not specify the long-term conditions for a permanent peace settlement.

The role of the United States in brokering this short-term truce has drawn scrutiny from European analysts. Reporting from Rzeczpospolita suggests that the dynamics of the negotiation may indicate a shift in diplomatic leverage, asserting that Donald Trump has diminished his influence over the Ukrainian government during the process.

Context of the May 9 Truce

The ceasefire occurs against the backdrop of the Moscow parade, where the Russian military typically displays its hardware and personnel. The decision to implement a ceasefire during this period suggests a coordinated effort to ensure the security of the celebrations in the Russian capital and a temporary reduction in frontline intensity.

For Ukraine, the acceptance of a three-day truce involves a calculated pause in military operations. The Ukrainian administration’s willingness to confirm the ceasefire, despite ongoing territorial disputes, aligns with the interpretation by diplomatic observers that Kyiv is attempting to signal a readiness for diplomatic openings without compromising its core security requirements.

The three-day duration of the ceasefire is a critical detail. Short-term truces are often used in high-intensity conflicts to facilitate the evacuation of civilians, the exchange of prisoners of war, or as a testing ground for longer-term diplomatic engagements. However, the current confirmation from both sides focuses primarily on the cessation of fire rather than specific humanitarian corridors.

Geopolitical Implications

The mediation by Donald Trump marks a specific attempt to exert American influence on the conflict’s trajectory. The confirmation of the truce by both warring parties suggests a level of coordination between the White House, the Presidential Office in Kyiv, and the Kremlin.

However, the perception of this success varies. While the announcement of a ceasefire is a tangible diplomatic development, the analysis that the U.S. Presidency has lost leverage over Ukraine suggests that Kyiv may be operating with more autonomy in its decision-making process than previously observed.

The current status of the conflict remains focused on whether this three-day window will serve as a precursor to more substantive negotiations or if It’s a symbolic pause linked to the Russian calendar. As of May 9, 2026, both Moscow and Kyiv remain committed to the short-term ceasefire, with the international community monitoring the front lines for adherence to the agreement.