Patriotism and National Identity: Insights from Filmmaker Andrejs Ēķis

Interview with Director Andrejs Ēķis: Reflections on Patriotism and Values

Interviewer: Why is patriotism important to you?

Andrejs Ēķis: My grandfather was politically repressed and spent fifteen years in Siberia. In the late 1970s, my family listened to “Voice of America” every evening, dreaming of restoring the Latvian Republic. This sense of belonging runs deep in my family history.

Interviewer: Do you think patriotism exists today, despite many focusing on personal gain?

Andrejs Ēķis: I believe it does. However, some confuse the state with the government. The state is a community where people come together for a better life. Most people appreciate the state, but frustration often targets the government.

Interviewer: Is love for one’s country important? Does the government do enough to nurture this feeling?

Andrejs Ēķis: I prefer the term “belonging” over “patriotism.” It reflects connection to something significant. For example, in my next film about Latvia’s post-World War I recovery, I found that land ownership empowered farmers who united to improve their livelihoods. Today, people often seem more self-focused, forgetting to invest in the country’s collective future.

Interviewer: How can citizens identify genuine political leaders?

Andrejs Ēķis: During elections, they should look at what each party promises and who provides real solutions, rather than superficial appeals. Often, parties make promises without accountability. People should actively support those who truly desire to lead.

Interviewer: But what about the disconnect between politicians and citizens’ voices?

Andrejs Ēķis: Many elect leaders but ignore those behind them. This dynamic often leads to disillusionment. A critical mindset is needed, and people must understand the importance of their votes and the impact of their choices.

Interviewer: Returning to your films, they often carry a patriotic message. Why is that?

Andrejs Ēķis: I dislike the word “patriotism” because it feels commercial. I want genuine feelings to arise from people’s inner selves. For example, after serving in the army, returning to Latvia felt momentous. This sense of belonging is innate and invaluable.

Interviewer: What is your vision for Latvia in ten years?

Andrejs Ēķis: I hope we continue to thrive in the European Union. Our integration is beneficial; it eliminates borders and allows any capable entrepreneur to succeed in Europe. It’s essential to appreciate our identity as a nation.

Interviewer: Is change possible for neighboring countries?

Andrejs Ēķis: Change in neighboring countries can happen, likely after significant setbacks, similar to Germany post-World War II. However, it requires profound transformation.

Interviewer: You emphasize distinction in your work. Does that apply to state identity?

Andrejs Ēķis: Absolutely. Estonia has defined itself as a digital nation, but Latvia struggles with consistent branding. We must convey our unique strengths, like forestry and environmental sustainability.

Interviewer: What should Latvia communicate on a global scale?

Andrejs Ēķis: We should project confidence and innovation. For instance, our drone coalition showcased our capabilities. We must recognize our potential beyond being small.

Interviewer: Regarding intellectual resources, do you think our think tanks are effective?

Andrejs Ēķis: Many think tanks feel formal and lack actionable goals. The state should invest in specific objectives. With support, innovative ideas may emerge.

Interviewer: Do you have a message for the nation?

Andrejs Ēķis: Latvia has 1.88 million citizens. I wish for everyone to acknowledge their ownership of this land and to act as responsible custodians. Each individual has the power to contribute positively.